"
Team:Buenos Aires/ model
From 2013.igem.org
(→Deterministic Model) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
For our biosensor we came up with three different designs each one motivated on improving the flaws detected while analysing the previous ones using mathematical models as our main tools. | For our biosensor we came up with three different designs each one motivated on improving the flaws detected while analysing the previous ones using mathematical models as our main tools. | ||
| - | We describe briefly the first two designs which were | + | We describe briefly the first two designs, which were rejected, to emphasize the importance of mathematical model to gain insight on how our system works and as a feasibility study taking into considerations . |
| - | ====Arsenic promoter + ArsR + | + | ====Arsenic promoter + ArsR + Reporter==== |
| - | First we tried to keep it as simple as we could. Figure 1 shows our first design which, in theory, produces different responses to different concentrations of arsenic in water. Figure 2 shows a simulation graphing the time series response of the Pars-arsR | + | First we tried to keep it as simple as we could. Figure 1 shows our first design which, in theory, produces different responses to different concentrations of arsenic in water. Figure 2 shows a simulation graphing the time series response of the Pars promoter-arsR for different concentrations of ars. |
| + | |||
| + | This result is true but misleading. Since our reporter was meant to be a coloured pigment (the reasons for this are detailed in the project tab) and the pigment is downstream | ||
Revision as of 03:47, 25 September 2013
Contents |
Deterministic Model
Introduction
Our objective was to assemble a system that could respond to different concentrations of a specific contaminant in water. More specifically, the idea was to produce different amounts of a coloured pigment depending on the concentration of the contaminant present in water.
We worked with Arsenic knowing that an arsenic detoxification operon (Ars operon) exist in nature and more important, it exists as biobricks.
Got Ideas?
For our biosensor we came up with three different designs each one motivated on improving the flaws detected while analysing the previous ones using mathematical models as our main tools. We describe briefly the first two designs, which were rejected, to emphasize the importance of mathematical model to gain insight on how our system works and as a feasibility study taking into considerations .
Arsenic promoter + ArsR + Reporter
First we tried to keep it as simple as we could. Figure 1 shows our first design which, in theory, produces different responses to different concentrations of arsenic in water. Figure 2 shows a simulation graphing the time series response of the Pars promoter-arsR for different concentrations of ars.
This result is true but misleading. Since our reporter was meant to be a coloured pigment (the reasons for this are detailed in the project tab) and the pigment is downstream
Unfortunately
As it is shown in the figure below, in the presence of arsenite (1000 ppb) a typical transcriptional induction is observed over time. There is a lag of 3 hours in the mRFP produciton after adding arsenite.
