Team:CU-Boulder/MedalRequirements

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 82: Line 82:
<ul>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:CU-Boulder/Collaboration">Collaboration with CSU</a>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:CU-Boulder/Collaboration">Collaboration with CSU</a>
 +
</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
 +
<ul>
 +
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:CU-Boulder/Outreach">Outreach</a>
</li>
</li>
</ul>
</ul>

Revision as of 18:53, 27 October 2013

Bronze. The following 5 goals must be achieved:
  1. Team registration.
  2. Complete Judging form.
  3. Team Wiki.
  4. Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree.
  5. Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry.
Silver: In addition to the Bronze Medal requirements, the following 4 goals must be achieved:
  1. Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.
  2. Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
  3. Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry.
  4. Your project may have implications for the environment, security, safety and ethics and/or ownership and sharing. Describe one or more ways in which these or other broader implications have been taken into consideration in the design and execution of your project.
Gold: In addition to the Bronze and Silver Medal requirements, any one or more of the following:
  1. Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device, enter this information in the Registry, create a new registry page for the improved part, and submit this part to the iGEM Parts Registry.
  2. Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
  3. Your project may have implications for the environment, security, safety and ethics and/or ownership and sharing. Describe a novel approach that your team has used to help you and others consider these aspects of the design and outcomes of synthetic biology efforts. Please justify its novelty and how this approach might be adapted and scaled for others to use.