Team:DTU-Denmark/Kinetic Model

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Methods)
(Methods)
Line 41: Line 41:
weight of 472 kDa corresponding to 7.838 · 10<sup>−16</sup> mg. With this number we convert
weight of 472 kDa corresponding to 7.838 · 10<sup>−16</sup> mg. With this number we convert
the vmax to 3.116 · 10<sup>−14</sup> μmol min<sup>−1</sup> . Then using the Avogadro number we derive a
the vmax to 3.116 · 10<sup>−14</sup> μmol min<sup>−1</sup> . Then using the Avogadro number we derive a
-
k<sup>cat</sup> value of 18765 min<sup>−1</sup>.
+
k<sub>cat</sub> value of 18765 min<sup>−1</sup>.

Revision as of 18:00, 4 October 2013

Contents


Kinetic model of the Pathway

Summary

In order to determine the practicality of our solution, we are applying kinetic modeling to investigate how much time our engeneered E. coli cells will take to convert a certain amount of ammonia to nitrous oxide. For ammonia concentrations typically encountered in wastewater, our modelling shows that our transformed E. coli cells will be able to do this within less than 10 minutes.

Methods

The reactions of the pathway we are trying to integrate in E. coli are:


1a.png

We constructed a kinetic model of our transformants based on literature research. To describe product formation by the enzymes we used the Michaelis-Menten approach (also the iGEM team from Taipei in 2012 was looking into kinetic modelling of Nir and Nos):

DTU mod 1b.png
DTU mod 1c.png


Some of the necessary parameters can be found in literature, they are listed in Table 1.


DTU modeling Tab 1.png

It is necessary to know or estimate the enzyme concentration if kcat values are used. Based on a paper we found that gives typical protein concentrations in E. coli [4] we chose to use four different enzyme concentrations in our model: 100, 500, 1000 and 100 000 enzymes per cell corresponding to low, medium, high and very high concentrations of enzyme.

DTU modeling Enz no.png


To be consistent in units we converted the vmax value of AMO and HAO to a kcat value in the following way: In [5] the amount of HAO in cell extract is given as 2.6% so for our conversion we assume 2% of the protein mass corresponds to AMO and another 2% correspond to HAO, summing up to 4%. This leads to a value of 39.75μmol min−1 mg of enzyme−1 . The molecular weight of AMO is given in [6] as 283 kDa and the molecular weight of HAO is given in [5] as 189 kDa. Summing those numbers leads to a molecular weight of 472 kDa corresponding to 7.838 · 10−16 mg. With this number we convert the vmax to 3.116 · 10−14 μmol min−1 . Then using the Avogadro number we derive a kcat value of 18765 min−1.


We also need to know how much ammonia the water we want to treat will contain. The ammonia concentration in different types of waste water is given in [7] as 1 mg/L in aquatic cultures, 10 mg/L for municipal waste water and more than 100 mg/L for industrial waste water. So the concentrations we want to look at in our model are: 1 mg/L (58.72μM), 10 mg/L (587.2μM), 100 mg/L(5.872 mM) and 500 mg/L (29.358 mM) ammonia.

The equations of the two models for Mutant 1 and Mutant 2 are:

DTU modeling Equations kin.png

The modeling was done in MATLAB using the Systems Biology Toolbox [8] and the scripts are uploaded in the section scripts below.

Results and Discussion

Concentration versus time plots of ammonia and nitrous oxide are shown in Figures 1-2 for different enzyme concentrations. 1000 enzymes per cell seems to be a reasonable number and results in converion times of less than 10 minutes. The plots shown here are estimations based on literature research and will be corrected once we have experimental data.


DTU-NO2 1mg ammonia.jpgDTU-NO2 10mg ammonia.jpgDTU-NO2 100mg ammonia.jpgDTU-NO2 500mg ammonia.jpg

Figure 1: Kinetic modeling of Mutant 1. Nitrite concentration over time based on kinetic parameters found in literature and for different enzyme and substrate (here NO2) concentrations.


DTU-fig2.png

Figure 2: Kinetic modeling of Mutant 2. Nitrous oxide concentration over time based on kinetic parameters found in literature and for different enzyme and substrate (here NO2) concentrations.

References

[1] WK Keener and DJ Arp. Kinetic studies of ammonia monooxygenase inhibition in Nitrosomonas europaea by hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons in an optimized whole-cell assay. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59(8): 2501–2510, 1993.

[2] Serena Rinaldo. Biology of the Nitrogen Cycle. Francesca Cutruzzola, 2007 (37-55).

[3] SW Snyder and TC Hollocher. Purification and some characteristics of nitrous oxide reductase from paracoccus denitrificans. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 262: 6515–6525, 1987.

[4] Y Ishihama, T Schmidt, J Rappsilber, M Mann, FU Hartl, MJ Kerner, and D Frishman. Protein abundance profiling of the escherichia coli cytosol. BMC genomics, 9, 2008.

[5] AB Hooper, PC Maxwell, and KR Terry. Hydroxylamine oxidoreductase from nitrosomonas: Absorption spectra and content of heme and metal. Biochemistry, 17:2984–2989, 1978.

[6] S Gilch, O Meyer, and I Schmidt. A soluble form of ammonia monooxygenase in nitrosomonas europaea. Biological Chemistry, 390(9):863–873, 2009.

[7] T.C. Jorgensen and L.R. Weatherley. Ammonia removal from wastewater by ion exchange in the presence of organic contaminants. Water Research, 37:723–1728, 2003.

[8] Systems biology toolbox for matlab: A computational platform for research in systems biology. Bioinformatics, 22(4):514–515, 2006.

Scripts

Model of Mutant 1

Plot time series Mutant 1

Model of Mutant 2

Plot time series of Mutant 2