Team:DTU-Denmark/Project

From 2013.igem.org

Revision as of 15:03, 1 October 2013 by Hezscha (Talk | contribs)

Project Description

Our project removes ammonia from waste water, and via two E. coli mutants, turns it into nitrous oxide.

Global demand for fixed nitrogen has increased to the point that half the human population now relies on chemical fertilizer to grow their food. While fertilizer is a requirement for modern life, runoff from overfertilized farmland can cause eutrophication. In the presence of abundant ammonia, algae overgrow and consume the much of the available oxygen in the water. This results in decreased biodiversity throughout the watershed. Within Europe, 53% of lakes are eutrophic.

Using two E. coli mutants built with genes from Nitrosomonas europaea and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we provide a system to reverse nitrogen fixation. Our mutants consume ammonia and produce nitrous oxide, releases a sustainable source of energy when decomposed into nitrogen and oxygen. We also provide a prototype of a bioreactor that could be scaled up and deployed in the field to simultaneously clean the water and produce energy.

Details

Dtu-pathway-mutant1.png

The first mutant incorporates AMO, HAO and two cytochromes c554 and cm552 from Nitrosomonas europaea (shown in blue). AMO is a 3 subunit protein which converts ammonia (NH4 to an intermediate called hydroxylamine (NH2OH). HAO then converts the hydroxylamine to nitrite (NO2-. During this conversion process, cytochrome c554 accepts an electron from HAO, and then passes this electron on to ccm552. The terminal electron acceptor in this chain is quinone. AMO and ccm552 are embedded in the cytoplasmic membrane, and all other proteins in this process are found in the periplasm.

Dtu-pathway-mutant2.png

The second mutant incorporates the Nir region from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (shown in yellow). NirS converts nitrite to nitric oxide (NO), while removing an electron from NirM. The remainder of the Nir region is necessary for the synthesis of NirM, and so we have included these genes as well. NOR, which is present natively in E. coli, converts nitric oxide to nitrous oxide (N2O). In contrast to N. europaea, E. coli is not a nitrifying bacterium and so does not convert nitrous oxide into nitrogen to complete the denitrification process.

Plasmids

Mutant 1

The final plasmid for Mutant 1 should be the following:

Dtu Plasmid mutant 1-01.png

In order to simplify and to be able to debug each part of this pathway separately, we implemented the following.

Unfortunately, we did not have time to combine all the genes into the final plasmid.

Dtu Plasmids amo.png Dtu Plasmids hao-01.pngDtu Plasmids cyt-01.png

Mutant 2

The final plasmid for Mutant 2 should be the following:

Dtu Plasmid mutant 2-01.png

Since we had difficulty extracting Nir from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in one piece, we have implemented TODO

User Cloning

To assemble our plasmids we employ uracil-specific excision reagent (USER) cloning[there should be a ref here]. This technique enables us to speed up the cloning process, to clone seamlessly and to assemble many fragments in one reaction. The steps are:

  1. PCR: The backbone and all fragments are amplified as linear products containing a uracil instead of a thymine at a specific position. This requires specifically designed primers with a tail that will become the overhang and a polymerase that is able to perform uracil-insertion.
  2. Optional - If circular DNA was used as PCR template a DpnI digestion can be performed to eliminate this DNA.
  3. USER-reaction: Digesting the linearized PCR fragment with the USER enzyme removes the uracil-insertions, which will produce the required overhangs.
  4. Transformation: The mix is immediately transformed into competent E. coli cells where the plasmid assembles itself by base pairing between the complementary overhangs.

See our "Bricks of Knowledge" video on USER cloning and the wiki of the 2011 DTU-2 iGEM team for more information.


References

  • Nour-Eldin, HH et al (2010). USER cloning and USER fusion: the ideal cloning techniques for small and big laboratories. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;643:185-200. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-723-5_13.
  • Ref2