Team:Heidelberg/Templates/Indigoidine week19

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
-
 
===pRB15-18===
===pRB15-18===
Line 25: Line 24:
|}
|}
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130902_screening
 
-
</gallery>
 
===Screening pKH4===
===Screening pKH4===
Line 41: Line 37:
|}
|}
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130902_screening
 
-
</gallery>
 
A miniprep of probe 4 was sent to sequencing, which was positive.
A miniprep of probe 4 was sent to sequencing, which was positive.
Line 77: Line 70:
|}
|}
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130902
 
-
</gallery>
 
KH3/4-PCRs were unsuccessful, so we did a gradient PCR  
KH3/4-PCRs were unsuccessful, so we did a gradient PCR  
Line 104: Line 94:
|}
|}
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130903_KH3-4_gradient.png
 
-
</gallery>
 
We run the same protocol for 3x 50 ul.
We run the same protocol for 3x 50 ul.
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130903_KH3-4.png
 
-
</gallery>
 
nothing
nothing
Line 118: Line 102:
16 x 10 ul with Q5 and Tm calculator suggested parameters (63 °C annealing), pRB19 ligation as template
16 x 10 ul with Q5 and Tm calculator suggested parameters (63 °C annealing), pRB19 ligation as template
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130903_KH3-4 16x 10
 
-
</gallery>
 
We tried NEB Phusion HF with 61 °C annealing temperature in a 10-, 20- and 50 ul reaction from pRB19 ligation and in a 20 ul reaction from pKH4 ind T100 (left).
We tried NEB Phusion HF with 61 °C annealing temperature in a 10-, 20- and 50 ul reaction from pRB19 ligation and in a 20 ul reaction from pKH4 ind T100 (left).
Line 146: Line 127:
Gradient on biometra cycler (72 °C, 65 °C, 58 °C)
Gradient on biometra cycler (72 °C, 65 °C, 58 °C)
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130902_screening
 
-
</gallery>
 
svp was always right; only after assembly it turned wrong. We will try to bring it in using restriction cloning and to sequence it; maybe the screening is just inconclusive.
svp was always right; only after assembly it turned wrong. We will try to bring it in using restriction cloning and to sequence it; maybe the screening is just inconclusive.
Line 284: Line 262:
Transformed cells looked as follows:
Transformed cells looked as follows:
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_201309 CPECs
 
-
</gallery>
 
Colony screenings
Colony screenings
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_201309 CPECs screening
 
-
</gallery>
 
pRB23 assembly was unsuccessful, pRB22 is correct (plates turn blue), pRB24 seems to be correct (small deep blue colonies), pRB19 didn't work, pKH5 seems correct. We prepped the marked colonies. Sequencing showed that pRB22 is correct and doesn't carry endogenous RFC10 cutting sites any longer. Test digestion with EcoRI and SpeI also enforced this result.
pRB23 assembly was unsuccessful, pRB22 is correct (plates turn blue), pRB24 seems to be correct (small deep blue colonies), pRB19 didn't work, pKH5 seems correct. We prepped the marked colonies. Sequencing showed that pRB22 is correct and doesn't carry endogenous RFC10 cutting sites any longer. Test digestion with EcoRI and SpeI also enforced this result.
Line 311: Line 283:
5 ul of each pRB15, 17 and 18 were put on an agarose gel with small pockets.
5 ul of each pRB15, 17 and 18 were put on an agarose gel with small pockets.
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
+
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130902_indC
+
-
</gallery>
+
PPTase plasmid minipreps are empty. We will try to assemble them again using a restriction strategy besides prepping them again.
PPTase plasmid minipreps are empty. We will try to assemble them again using a restriction strategy besides prepping them again.
Line 373: Line 343:
|}
|}
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130902_indC_res
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130902_indC_res
 
-
</gallery>
 
svp was reamplified from short product
svp was reamplified from short product
Line 402: Line 368:
|}
|}
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130902_svplong
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130902_svplong
 
-
</gallery>
 
indC and pSB1C3 were digested with KpnI and NheI, sfp, svp, entD, delC and pSB3K3 with BamHI and NheI for two hours at 37 °C.
indC and pSB1C3 were digested with KpnI and NheI, sfp, svp, entD, delC and pSB3K3 with BamHI and NheI for two hours at 37 °C.
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130903_digest
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130903_digest_cut
 
-
</gallery>
 
Unfortunately pSB3K3 contains an internal NheI cutting site. We repeated the amplification, purification, restriction digest and purification with BamHI and SpeI, which builds a scar with NheI.
Unfortunately pSB3K3 contains an internal NheI cutting site. We repeated the amplification, purification, restriction digest and purification with BamHI and SpeI, which builds a scar with NheI.
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130903_pSB3K3
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130903_pSB3K3_cut
 
-
</gallery>
 
Ligation of pSB1C3 with indC(ccdB) was performed over night in a 10 ul reaction with 4 ul fragments each.
Ligation of pSB1C3 with indC(ccdB) was performed over night in a 10 ul reaction with 4 ul fragments each.
Line 425: Line 379:
Transformation of ligation mixes were performed with 5 µl each in TOP10. Additionally 5 µl of ligation mix of pRB19 was transformed into OneShot cells.
Transformation of ligation mixes were performed with 5 µl each in TOP10. Additionally 5 µl of ligation mix of pRB19 was transformed into OneShot cells.
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130905_plates_pRB15-18-ligation
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130905_plates_pRB19-ligation
 
-
</gallery>
 
Colony screenings showed following results:
Colony screenings showed following results:
Line 437: Line 387:
Because we could observe small colonies with darkgray center on cotransformed pRB21 with all PPtases constructs (plates of 2013-08-27), we conducted a colony screen and a retransformation with 1 µl of previous MP of pRB15.2 (Konrad) and pRB16-18 (Ralf) and pRB21 (Ralf). Additionally a cotransformation with this old pRB21 MP with the old pRB15.2 as well with 2.5 µl of newly assembled pRB15 was performed.
Because we could observe small colonies with darkgray center on cotransformed pRB21 with all PPtases constructs (plates of 2013-08-27), we conducted a colony screen and a retransformation with 1 µl of previous MP of pRB15.2 (Konrad) and pRB16-18 (Ralf) and pRB21 (Ralf). Additionally a cotransformation with this old pRB21 MP with the old pRB15.2 as well with 2.5 µl of newly assembled pRB15 was performed.
-
<gallery widths="400px" heights="300px">
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130905_plates_pRB15-18_pRB21
 
-
File:Heidelberg_20130905_plates_CT_pRB15-pRB21
 
-
</gallery>
 
The colony screening was performed using the primers [[Primer#VR|VR]] and [[Primer#KH5|KH5]]. If the gray colonies carry two plasmids with indigoidine synthetase and activating PPtase separately an amplicon of size ~1.3 kbp. Otherwise if for some reason the PPtase and indigoidine synthetase are still on one plasmid, we could expect an amplicon of 2.1 kbp.
The colony screening was performed using the primers [[Primer#VR|VR]] and [[Primer#KH5|KH5]]. If the gray colonies carry two plasmids with indigoidine synthetase and activating PPtase separately an amplicon of size ~1.3 kbp. Otherwise if for some reason the PPtase and indigoidine synthetase are still on one plasmid, we could expect an amplicon of 2.1 kbp.

Latest revision as of 15:48, 21 October 2013

Contents

pRB15-18

The first mini


Screening delC

Table 15.x Screening pRB18
TemplatePrimerComment
TOP10+pSB3K3RB64/VRnegative control
VF2/65
TOP10+pRB18RB64/VRscreening
VF2/65
VF2/VR
delC PCR productRB64/RB65positive control


Screening pKH4

Table 15.x Screening pKH4
TemplatePrimer
TOP10+pKH4KH52/VR
VF2/RB71


A miniprep of probe 4 was sent to sequencing, which was positive.

Assembly of pKH4-derivates

pKH4 is used for assembly of pKH5 and variants of pKH4 with all the different T-Domains.

Table 15.x Amplification KH3/4 from pKH4
KH3/4 in BioRAD T100
cyclestemperature [°C]time [s]
19810
10981
td 625
722.00
25981
575
722.00
1726.00
112-


KH3/4-PCRs were unsuccessful, so we did a gradient PCR

Table 15.x Amplification KH3/4 from pKH4
KH3/4 in biometra
cyclestemperature [°C]time [s]
19810
10981
58-59-60-61-62-635
722.00
1726.00
112-


We run the same protocol for 3x 50 ul.


nothing

16 x 10 ul with Q5 and Tm calculator suggested parameters (63 °C annealing), pRB19 ligation as template


We tried NEB Phusion HF with 61 °C annealing temperature in a 10-, 20- and 50 ul reaction from pRB19 ligation and in a 20 ul reaction from pKH4 ind T100 (left). As well we ran with Phusion HF (59 °C annealing) in 20 ul reactions with 0, 1 and 2 ul DMSO (Biorad Cycler 2)

For further evaluation of the single plasmid strategy we admired a plasmid with bpsA instead of indC as indigoidine synthetase. For a quick shot we wanted to use pKH4 and pRB7 for a restriction approach with the enzymes KpnI and BamHI.

  • prepare digestion (20 µl), 37 °C, ~0.5 h:
    • pKH4: 2 µl NEBuffer CutSmart, 4 µl pKH4, 13 µl H2O, 0.5 µl (KpnI, BamHI)
    • pRB7: 2 µl NEBuffer CutSmart, 2.3 µl pRB7, 14.7 µl H2O, 0.5 µl (KpnI, BamHI)

The restriction for pKH4 did not work correctly due to the fact that with assembly of pKH4 the BamHI cutting site was removed and the plasmid was only linearized by the KpnI cutting site. For pRB7 two bands at almost equal site can be expected and thereby the digestion approach can not be used in this manner. We will try again with a similar approach like for the assembly of pKH4 as here a nonsense sequence instead of the PPtases will be introduced into pRB7.

  • preparation of pRB7 MP by retransformation of TOP10 (as no glycerol stock is available).

Amplification of svp

The svp fragment we used so far was wrong, so we try to amplify it again from the genome, using various primers:

  • RB13/14
  • RB15/16
  • RB29/30
  • RB39/40

Gradient on biometra cycler (72 °C, 65 °C, 58 °C)


svp was always right; only after assembly it turned wrong. We will try to bring it in using restriction cloning and to sequence it; maybe the screening is just inconclusive.

Amplification of indC-fragments

indC fragments are amplified from Plum genome and indC short PCR product in a 50 ul Phusioin HF reaction. The fragments are:

  • RB27/69
  • RB70/71
  • RB68/46
  • RB68/KH4
  • KH5/RB46
  • RB27/46 from pRB14
  • RB27/28
Table 14.x PCR indC(ccdB) for pRB19
RB27/69 in BioRAD T100 from indC short
RB27/69 in BioRAD T100 from P. luminescens pellet
RB70/71 in BioRAD T100 from indC short
RB70/71 in BioRAD T100 from P. luminescens pellet
KH5/RB46 in BioRAD T100 from indC short
KH5/RB46 in BioRAD T100 from P. luminescens pellet
cyclestemperature [°C]time [s]
1982.00
35985
5515
7230
1722.00
112-
RB68/46 in BioRAD T100 from indC short
RB68/46 in BioRAD T100 from P. luminescens pellet
RB68/KH4 in BioRAD T100 from indC short
RB68/KH4 in BioRAD T100 from P. luminescens pellet
cyclestemperature [°C]time [s]
1982.00
309815
5515
722.00
1725.00
112-

Fragment RB70/71 is wrong because RB71 is wrong. We repeated the amplification with RB78 instead of RB71.

Fragment KH3/RB46 is very weak, so we try to improve this reaction as well.

Table 15.x Amplification indC RB21/46 from pRB14 and pSB1C3 RB21/22 from miniprep
KH3/RB46 in BioRAD T100
cyclestemperature [°C]time [s]
19810
12981
td 605
7220
23981
635
7220
17260
112-

And reaction RB68/RB46 with the same protocol but 60 s elongation time.

We try KH3/RB79 with improved conditions.

We tried to get this fragment with KH9/RB79 with Q5 in biometra cycler (60 °C annealing)

We tried to get this fragment with KH9/RB79 with Phusion HF in biometra old cycler (61 °C annealing)

Gel Extraction yielded xx ng/ ul

CPEC assemblies were performed for following plasmids with the respective fragments:

  • pRB19: RB27/79 from pRB14 and RB21/22 from pSB1C3 midiprep
  • pRB22: RB27/69 RB70/78 RB68/79 RB21/22
  • pRB23: RB27/69 RB70/78 RB68/KH4 KH9/RB79 (pRB14) RB21/22
  • pRB24: RB27/28 RB66/67 RB21/22
  • pKH5: KH3/4 (pKH4) KH9/10

Transformed cells looked as follows:


Colony screenings


pRB23 assembly was unsuccessful, pRB22 is correct (plates turn blue), pRB24 seems to be correct (small deep blue colonies), pRB19 didn't work, pKH5 seems correct. We prepped the marked colonies. Sequencing showed that pRB22 is correct and doesn't carry endogenous RFC10 cutting sites any longer. Test digestion with EcoRI and SpeI also enforced this result.

We performed a PCR with Phusion HF and KH3/4 from pRB22, assembled it in a CPEC approach with ccdB KH9/10 and transformed OneShot cells.

Colony screenings and test-transformation in TOP10 cells showed that the assembly was successful and that we're able to shuffle the T-domains.

Minipreps

Minipreps of pRB15, pRB17, pRB18, pKH4 and pRB14 yielded:

  • pRB15
  • pRB17
  • pRB18
  • pRB14: 284.8 ng/ ul in 20 ul
  • pKH4: 316.8 ng/ ul in 20 ul

5 ul of each pRB15, 17 and 18 were put on an agarose gel with small pockets.


PPTase plasmid minipreps are empty. We will try to assemble them again using a restriction strategy besides prepping them again. Repetitioin of the miniprep was successful and the plasmids were sent to sequencing.

Cotransformation

We did cotransformation of pKH4 with pRB15-18, respectively, and single transformation of pSB3K3, pKH4 and pRB15-18.

Restriction cloning for pRB15-19

Table 15.x Amplification indC RB21/46 from pRB14 and pSB1C3 RB21/22 from miniprep
RB21/22 in BioRAD T100
cyclestemperature [°C]time [s]
19810
12981
td 605
7250
23981
655
7240
1723.00
112-
RB27/46 in BioRAD T100
cyclestemperature [°C]time [s]
19810
12981
td 605
7270
18981
655
7260
1722.00
112-


svp was reamplified from short product


Table 15.x Amplification indC RB21/46 from pRB14 and pSB1C3 RB21/22 from miniprep
RB21/22 in BioRAD T100
cyclestemperature [°C]time [s]
19810
35981
655
7220
17260
112-


indC and pSB1C3 were digested with KpnI and NheI, sfp, svp, entD, delC and pSB3K3 with BamHI and NheI for two hours at 37 °C.


Unfortunately pSB3K3 contains an internal NheI cutting site. We repeated the amplification, purification, restriction digest and purification with BamHI and SpeI, which builds a scar with NheI.


Ligation of pSB1C3 with indC(ccdB) was performed over night in a 10 ul reaction with 4 ul fragments each.

Transformation of ligation mixes were performed with 5 µl each in TOP10. Additionally 5 µl of ligation mix of pRB19 was transformed into OneShot cells.


Colony screenings showed following results:

We prepped pRB15, 17 and 18 and repeated the assembly of pRB16 from scratch. Therefore we used RB13/14 for amplification of svp from an S. verticilllus ATCC15003 liquid culture. Afterwards we reamplified this PCR gel extraction with RB29/30 and performed a restriction digest with BamHI and NheI to ligate the fragment with pSB3K3 (BamHI; SpeI).

Reevaluation of old MP pRB15-18, pRB21

Because we could observe small colonies with darkgray center on cotransformed pRB21 with all PPtases constructs (plates of 2013-08-27), we conducted a colony screen and a retransformation with 1 µl of previous MP of pRB15.2 (Konrad) and pRB16-18 (Ralf) and pRB21 (Ralf). Additionally a cotransformation with this old pRB21 MP with the old pRB15.2 as well with 2.5 µl of newly assembled pRB15 was performed.


The colony screening was performed using the primers VR and KH5. If the gray colonies carry two plasmids with indigoidine synthetase and activating PPtase separately an amplicon of size ~1.3 kbp. Otherwise if for some reason the PPtase and indigoidine synthetase are still on one plasmid, we could expect an amplicon of 2.1 kbp.

Table 15.x colony screening cotrafo pRB21 and pRB15-18, 2013-08-27
KH5/VR in Biometra, 10 µl
cyclestemperature [°C]time [s]
195120
309530
6030
72120
172240
112-

The positive controls gave the expected bands. All picked clones also gave an expected band at 1.3 kbp which leads to the conclusion that they carry the indC-only plasmid pRB21. Because every third clone was a picked white colony we could also conclude, that not all transformants carry an intact PPtase plasmid.

T-domain exchange with different domain borders

We thought of a different way to set the T-Domain borders. Starting from the Pfam-predicted domain borders we made pairwise alignments to find amino acid sequences up- and downstream the predicted borders, that are identical in both the native and the brought in sequence. In the case of the exchange of indC and bpsA those new borders would be around 10 amino acids more on each side. We designed primers for this strategy.

Screenings

Table 15.x Screening of new constructs
PlasmidPrimer 1Primer 2Expected product [bp]wrong product [bp]additional test
pKH6VRRB171070
pKH7VRRB131120
pKH8VRRB411000
pKH9VRRB641070
pRB15_ligVRRB171070
pRB16_ligVRRB131120
pRB17_ligVRRB411000
pRB18_ligVRRB641070
pRB19_ligVRKH919002600
VRRB17-1070
pRB22_fragdigest
pRB23_fragVRKH91900digest
RB27KH42900
pKH5VRKH92100
pRB24VRKH52600
VRRB641070
pRB7----digest

We repeated the screening of pKH8 with 20 colonies and amplified svp with RB29/30 from pKH7.