Team:Northwestern/Project

From 2013.igem.org

Revision as of 18:48, 25 September 2013 by 2013.igem.nu (Talk | contribs)

Project At a Glance

The pH of the mouth drops several times per day after mealtimes, which results in severe tooth decay over time if not addressed. One way to combat this problem is to engineer the microbiome of the mouth to respond dynamically to changes in pH. To enable this, here we present the development of a novel dual-state promoter for the detection of and response to pH fluctuations in the mouth has been started.

This novel transcription regulation element will be capable of having both constitutive and inducible activity. This is achieved by linking a constitutive promoter downstream a pH-inducible promoter. We plan to characterize our dual-state promoter by first linking single promoters upstream green fluorescent protein (GFP) and assess the transcriptional activity via fluorescence assays. This will be followed by assays on the dual-state promoter.

The hypothesis is that the pH-inducible promoters will have minimal activity at a neutral pH, with an intense activity as the pH nears and crossed the cavity formation threshold. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the constitutive promoters will have a constant activity, independent of pH. The dual-state promoter construct is hypothesized to have the combined effect of both of the promoters, with a constant basal expression as well as a pH-inducible response. This technology will have future applications in any system requiring pH detection and response.

Summary of Problem

Oral health is one of the most overlooked aspects of health care in the world. According to the World Health Organization, 60-90% of children worldwide have dental cavities, while they are present in nearly 100% of adults1. Tooth decay and cavity development are a direct result of the plaque that accumulates in the mouth after meals. The plaque is a biofilm composed of a number of different types of bacteria native to the oral biome2. These bacteria, in particular Streptococcus mutans, secrete lactic acid as a result of sucrose metabolism, and the resulting drop in pH causes demineralization of the enamel3. Since the plaque traps the lactic acid on the surface of the teeth this pH drop takes place in direct contact with the enamel at a significant concentration. This pH drop is most prevalent directly following mealtimes. The threshold pH at which demineralization occurs is 5.5. The figure below shows that the surface of the enamel can spend nearly 5 hours a day exposed to pH below the demineralization threshold, thus this is a serious problem that provides motivation for this research.

Figure 1: The Stephan Curve4, depicting pH fluctuation in the mouth over 24 hours.

Project References


  1. World Health Organization . 2012 April. Oral health [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 2] . Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs318/en/
  2. Zijnge V, van Leeuwen MB, Degener JE, Abbas F, Thurnheer T, Gmur R, Harmsen HJ. 2010. Oral biofilm architecture on natural teeth. NCBI [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 8] 5(2):e9321. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20195365
  3. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. 2007. Dental caries. The Lancet [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 15] 369(9555):51-59. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673607600312
  4. Stephan RM &Miller BF. The Effect of Synthetic Detergents on pH Changes in Dental Plaques. J DENT RES Feb 1943 22: 53-61
  5. Tucker DL, Tucker N, Conway T. 2002. Gene Expression Profiling of the pH Response in Escherichia coli. Journal of Bacteriology [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 19] 184(23):6551-6558. Available from: http://jb.asm.org/content/184/23/6551.full
  6. de Boer HA, Comstock LJ, Vasser M. 1983. The tac promoter: a functional hybrid derived from the trp and lac promoters. NCBI [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 22] 80(1):21-5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6337371
  7. Inouye S, Inouye M. 1985. Up-promoter mutations in the lpp gene of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 22] 13(9):3101-3110. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC341223/

Project Details

Detection of pH Levels
Dual State Promoter
Detection of pH Levels
Experiments and Results
Methods and Protocol

Detection of pH Levels

E.Coli has several inherent mechanisms to detect pH levels. In our project, we look into two genes that are crucial in pH detection: Asr and GadA. Both have different mechanisms. Elaborate more on how this works. Plus citation.

Dual State Promoter

The goal of this research is to create a system that ensures that oral pH is never low enough to cause enamel demineralization, so construction of a simple promoter will not suffice, as the system needs to respond to the dynamic pH environment found on the surface of the enamel. Instead, it is desired for gene expression to be directly proportional to the concentration of lactic acid. In order to address this particular problem, we must fundamentally create a new transcription regulation system: a dual-state promoter. A dual-state promoter is a promoter in which two “states” are possible. One obvious example would be similar to an electric switch – the potential states being on and off. For our system, the promoter must be more complex. In order to create the promoter, a two-part approach will be utilized. First, a constantly active, constitutive, promoter will be used to continually activate the given response genes at a background, or basal, level. This will cause gene expression when lactic acid concentration is low. However when the lactic acid concentration increases, such as after meals when S. mutans catabolized sucrose, an inducible promoter is also desired. This promoter will be pH-induced and will respond to large increases in lactic acid concentration. As a result, the desired promoter will function as both constitutive and inducible. The promoter will be constitutive at a basal level and then induce the gene(s) of interest at a higher level in response to a pH that nears and potentially drops below 5.5. Therefore the two states for the promoter will be low activity and high activity, and the state the promoter is in will be dependent upon pH. This will be done by placing a pH-dependent promoter upstream of a constitutive promoter to allow dual control of the downstream gene expression

put image of dual state

Insert IMAGE A schematic of the dual-state promoter that will be developed in this research.

The asr and gadA promoters5 will both be options for the pH-induced promoter in Figure 2. The asr promoter will be taken from the acid-shock response (asr) gene in Escherichia coli. The gadA promoter will be taken from the first of the glutamic acid decarboxylase (gad) genes (known as gadA). Two known constitutive promoters, Tac and Lpp6,7, will be tested in combination with these pH-induced promoters to find the optimum construct. Further optimization will be explored by varying the length of the spacer region between the two promoters. The spacing between the two promoters is important in the event that two RNA polymerases bind to the both promoters at the same time. Optimal spacing will decrease any potential steric hindrance between the two enzymes while also minimizing the distance said enzymes must travel along the DNA prior to encountering the start codon and beginning the elongations step of transcription. Modeling using Pymol has shown that a RNA polymerase is roughly equivalent in length to 64 base pairs of DNA when the DNA is in the helix formation. A total of 12 combinations will be used to create the library of dual-state promoters. Our hypothesis is that the Asr promoter combined with a 64 base pair spacer and the Tac promoter will have the greatest ability to ensure that oral pH does not drop below 5.5 for two reasons: (1) the Asr promoter has been seen to express at a slightly higher level than gadA at low pH5, and (2) the 64 bp spacer should minimize both steric hindrance and the distance RNA polymerase must travel in order to begin elongation of mRNA. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) will be used to measure the effect of the promoter combinations tested at varying pH levels in order to show both basal and inductive gene expression since it is a simple qualitative assay for measuring the level of transcription. The developed promoter will have numerous applications for use in pH environments to increase the regulation of pH related genes.

Methods and Experiments

Strains and Media

scherichia coli Top10 (Invitrogen) was used for all transformations and assays. Media included SOB for transformations and LB for overnight cultures. Transformed strains were grown at 37°C using Ampicillin resistance. Primers for PCR were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) and New England Biolabs (NEB) donated all of the restriction enzymes. All sequencing was conducted by the Northwestern Genomics Core.

Forming a Library of Constructs

e low copy plasmid pSB4A5 will be used for the different promoter constructs. The asr and gadA promoters were extracted from the E. coli genome via colony polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The constitutive promoters TacI and Lpp were amplified from pDAK1 and pDAK2 donated by the Jewett Lab6,7. The restriction enzyme cut sites EcoR1, Pst1, Spe1, and Xba1 were used in ligation to create the different constructs (Figure 3). When multiple parts were connected a mixed site was formed between Spe1 and Xba1, which cannot be cut, by any of the restriction enzymes. This leads to the benefit of not having a restriction site in the middle of the construct, and furthermore these standard restriction enzymes can always be used with the final dual-state promoter constructs.

Fluorescence Assays

orescence assays of GFP expression will be conducted to analyze the activity of both the single promoters and the dual-state combinations. This will done by using a plate reader to measure the fluorescence per optical density of cells in minimal media with pH ranging from 7.5 – 3. The reason optical density will be taken into account is to control for fluorescence differences that may be based on different cell counts across trials. Instead the chosen measurement will be analogous to fluorescence per cell, giving much greater insight into the activity of the dual-state promoter in each cell at each pH level.

Results