Team:USP-Brazil/Results:FreezeDry

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{https://2013.igem.org/Team:USP-Brazil/templateUP}} <html> <div style="background: url('https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c2/USPBrazilBackground.png') no-repeat top right; min-...")
Line 9: Line 9:
<h3>Lyophilization</h3>
<h3>Lyophilization</h3>
 +
<p>We didn’t found on literature protocols or references about lyophilization of <i>Pichia pastoris</i>,
 +
but&#8212;as the baker’s dry yeasts may confirm&#8212;the protocols for yeasts are abundant. Using as
 +
reference the known methodologies for <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> and other yeasts [4], we tested
 +
combinations of two cryoprotectants for <i>Pichia’s lyophilization</i>: powered milk and monosodic
 +
glutamate (see our Notebook {link aqui}).</p>
 +
 +
<p>Doing the lyophilization process on 1.5 mL eppendorfs (tip: latter, we found that using 15
 +
mL falcon tubes is much better to avoid spilling of the samples on the low pressures of the
 +
lyophilizator), the following results were obtained:</p>
 +
 +
<p class="figure"><br /><b>Figure 1:</b>We serially diluted the resuspended lyophilized samples: each section of plate corresponds to an ordered area of (three)10 microL drops from solutions diluted in different orders (as could be seen in the Milk + Glutamate plate, the order of dilutions is from right to left and up to dowm).</p>
<h4>Defining the best cryoprotectants </h4>
<h4>Defining the best cryoprotectants </h4>
Line 23: Line 34:
-
<p>Although threalose was not used&#8212;what is also a good protectant for yeast species [22]&#8212;, the result showed itself interesting enough for a cheaper way to make lyophilized <i>Pichia</i>. Since lactose is not metabolized by this yeast [23], this might not affect P<sub>AOX1</sub> activation if the powdered milk does not have residual glucose quantities. Those interesting findings support the next subject of our project: the idealized device who could compartmentalize the <i>Pichia</i> powder in a simple, secure and user-friendly way. Check the next section where we try to put all the pieces together to built the product</a>.</p>
+
<p>Although threalose was not used&#8212;what is also a good protectant for yeast species [4]&#8212;, the result showed itself interesting enough for a cheaper way to make lyophilized <i>Pichia</i>. Since lactose is not metabolized by this yeast [5], this might not affect P<sub>AOX1</sub> activation if the powdered milk does not have residual glucose quantities. milk doesn’t have residual glucose quantities. As could be seen on the graph next subsection, we achieved a very interesting result for the cells viability after lyophilization, reaching around 94%
 +
of viability on immediate resuspension of cells after the freeze-drying.</p>

Revision as of 11:44, 27 September 2013

Template:Https://2013.igem.org/Team:USP-Brazil/templateUP

Results

Lyophilization

We didn’t found on literature protocols or references about lyophilization of Pichia pastoris, but—as the baker’s dry yeasts may confirm—the protocols for yeasts are abundant. Using as reference the known methodologies for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other yeasts [4], we tested combinations of two cryoprotectants for Pichia’s lyophilization: powered milk and monosodic glutamate (see our Notebook {link aqui}).

Doing the lyophilization process on 1.5 mL eppendorfs (tip: latter, we found that using 15 mL falcon tubes is much better to avoid spilling of the samples on the low pressures of the lyophilizator), the following results were obtained:


Figure 1:We serially diluted the resuspended lyophilized samples: each section of plate corresponds to an ordered area of (three)10 microL drops from solutions diluted in different orders (as could be seen in the Milk + Glutamate plate, the order of dilutions is from right to left and up to dowm).

Defining the best cryoprotectants

As the baker’s dry yeast may confirm, protocols for yeast cells are abundant. Using as reference the known methodologies for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other yeast species[22], we tested combinations of two cryoprotectants for the lyophilization of P. pastoris: powdered milk and monosodic glutamate (see our Notebook). After realizing the lyophilization process with 1.5 mL tubes, the following results were obtained:

Table 2: CFU for each test in 1.5 mL tubes. 24h lyophilization process with 1 mL of cell suspension.

GlutamateMilk + GlutamateMilkControl (only YPD) CFUi
CFU/mL8.8 x 1027.76 x 1064.4 x 10303.667 x 107
%CFUi2,4 x 10-5211,2 x 10-40100

Although threalose was not used—what is also a good protectant for yeast species [4]—, the result showed itself interesting enough for a cheaper way to make lyophilized Pichia. Since lactose is not metabolized by this yeast [5], this might not affect PAOX1 activation if the powdered milk does not have residual glucose quantities. milk doesn’t have residual glucose quantities. As could be seen on the graph next subsection, we achieved a very interesting result for the cells viability after lyophilization, reaching around 94% of viability on immediate resuspension of cells after the freeze-drying.

Template:Https://2013.igem.org/Team:USP-Brazil/templateDOWN