Team:Valencia Biocampus/HP

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(39 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 41: Line 41:
blockquote {
blockquote {
   font-style:italic;
   font-style:italic;
-
   background: #f9f9f9;
+
  font-size:12px;
-
   border-left: 10px solid #ccc;
+
   background: rgba(249, 249, 249, 0.8);
-
  margin: 1.5em 10px;
+
   border-left: 7px solid rgba(204, 204, 204, 0.8);
-
   margin-bottom:0;
+
   margin: 0px;
-
   padding: 0.5em 10px;
+
   padding: 5px;
   quotes: "\201C""\201D""\2018""\2019";
   quotes: "\201C""\201D""\2018""\2019";
}
}
Line 64: Line 64:
<html>
<html>
-
<div id="new_and_improved" style="width:140px;position:absolute;top:15px;left:370px;z-index:150;"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/b7/Vlc_biocampus_new_and_improved.png" alt="NEW AND IMPROVED FOR THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP" style="width:100%;" /> </div>
+
<div id="new_and_improved" style="width:140px;position:absolute;top:6px;left:420px;z-index:11;"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/b7/Vlc_biocampus_new_and_improved.png" alt="NEW AND IMPROVED FOR THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP" style="width:100%;" /> </div>
 +
<div id="kathy_quote" style="width:190px;position:absolute;top:72px;left:-40px;z-index:11;font-size:12px">
 +
<blockquote>
 +
It (Ten tales of Synthetic Biology) is a great way for students to think about broader implications of technology in practice and about how technology assessment can move beyond a narrow consideration of health and safety risks.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
<p style="text-align:right;background:rgba(255,255,255,0.8)">Kathy Jo Wetter, author of one of the prefaces of our book</p>
 +
</div>
<div id="hp_hand" style="text-align:center">
<div id="hp_hand" style="text-align:center">
Line 110: Line 116:
<h3><i>Ten Tales on Synthetic Biology</i></h3>
<h3><i>Ten Tales on Synthetic Biology</i></h3>
     Once imbibed in RRI, we decided to make an experiment with ourselves: the team was divided in two groups of five students each, and each group was randomly
     Once imbibed in RRI, we decided to make an experiment with ourselves: the team was divided in two groups of five students each, and each group was randomly
-
     assigned a very optimistic and a very pessimistic view on Synthetic Biology. This yielded <b>our dual book</b> with both the bright and dark side of this
+
     assigned a very optimistic or a very pessimistic view on Synthetic Biology. This yielded <a href="#modal_book" role="button" data-toggle="modal"><b>our dual book</b></a> with both the bright and dark side of this
-
     new discipline, not unlike R.L. Stevenson “Dr. Jekyll and Mister Hyde”. We asked an enthusiast of SB, Robert Carlson, to write one of the prefaces, while
+
     new discipline, not unlike R.L. Stevenson “Dr. Jekyll and Mister Hyde”... We asked an enthusiast of SB, Robert Carlson, to write one of the prefaces, while
     Kathy Jo Wetter, a member of the ECT group, wrote the other.
     Kathy Jo Wetter, a member of the ECT group, wrote the other.
</p>
</p>
-
<blockquote>
 
-
It (Ten tales of Synthetic Biology) is a great way for students to think about broader implications of technology in practice and about how technology assessment can move beyond a narrow consideration of health and safety risks.
 
-
</blockquote>
 
-
<p style="text-align:right">Kathy Jo Wetter, author of one of the prefaces of our book</p>
 
</div>
</div>
Line 194: Line 196:
     <div class="modal-header">
     <div class="modal-header">
     <button type="button" class="close" data-dismiss="modal" aria-hidden="true">×</button>
     <button type="button" class="close" data-dismiss="modal" aria-hidden="true">×</button>
-
     <h3 id="modal_label_RRiTest">How do you choose your research topic?</h3>
+
     <h3 id="modal_label_RRiTest">Responsible Research and Innovation </h3>
     </div>
     </div>
     <div class="modal-body">
     <div class="modal-body">
<p>
<p>
-
     After studying the meaning of the term "Responsible Research and Innovation" and after applying it to our project, we decided to go one step further: we
+
     Beyond our report on Responsible Research and Innovation, the book and our transparency activities, we decided to go one step further: we have chosen eight flagship publications on Synthetic Biology and we have subjected them to the "RRI TEST”. <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Valencia_Biocampus/RRiTest">Here you can see our results</a>.
-
    have chosen eight of the striking publications on synthetic biology and we have subjected them to the "RRI filter”. <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Valencia_Biocampus/RRiTest">Here you can see our results</a>.
+
</p>
</p>

Latest revision as of 22:47, 28 October 2013

Show/hide wiki menu

NEW AND IMPROVED FOR THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP
It (Ten tales of Synthetic Biology) is a great way for students to think about broader implications of technology in practice and about how technology assessment can move beyond a narrow consideration of health and safety risks.

Kathy Jo Wetter, author of one of the prefaces of our book

Human Practices Hand Human Practices Hand Human Practices Hand Human Practices Hand Human Practices Hand Human Practices Hand

Human Practices Section

Human Practices

Responsible Research and Innovation

Science must be useful to society. Reciprocally, Human Practices approaches should serve scientists, who should not see it as just biosafety warnings, legal limitations or research obstacles. Responsible Research and Innovation deals with Science as a part of the Society, with which a transparent and fruitful feedback is set. We committed to apply such transparency in our project; in our honest notebook; in the form of the biosafety form; a TV-like iGEM news in youtube; and in our wiki.

We have studied all the available bibliography on RRI and prepared the first Report on RRI and Synthetic Biology with a focus on iGEM. We discuss what is RRI, how it relates to new technologies such SB, and why the iGEM competition should pay attention to this brand new way of applying Human Practices to research: with an integrative and positive perspective.


Ten Tales on Synthetic Biology

Once imbibed in RRI, we decided to make an experiment with ourselves: the team was divided in two groups of five students each, and each group was randomly assigned a very optimistic or a very pessimistic view on Synthetic Biology. This yielded our dual book with both the bright and dark side of this new discipline, not unlike R.L. Stevenson “Dr. Jekyll and Mister Hyde”... We asked an enthusiast of SB, Robert Carlson, to write one of the prefaces, while Kathy Jo Wetter, a member of the ECT group, wrote the other.

Retrieved from "http://2013.igem.org/Team:Valencia_Biocampus/HP"