"
Team:Valencia Biocampus/Modeling
From 2013.igem.org
(→Chemotaxis) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<li class="active"><a href="#Modeling">Modeling overview</a></li> | <li class="active"><a href="#Modeling">Modeling overview</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="#BiobricksModeling">Briobicks Modeling</a></li> | <li><a href="#BiobricksModeling">Briobicks Modeling</a></li> | ||
| - | <li><a href="# | + | <li><a href="#Single">Single worm behaviour</a></li> |
| + | <li><a href="#Group">Group behaviour</a></li> | ||
| + | <li><a href="#System">System performance</a></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 33: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
| - | </div><div class="tab-pane fade" id=" | + | </div><div class="tab-pane fade" id="Single"> |
</html> | </html> | ||
| Line 55: | Line 57: | ||
Berg HC (1993) <i>Random walks in biology</i>. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.<br> | Berg HC (1993) <i>Random walks in biology</i>. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.<br> | ||
Pierce-Shimomura JT, Morse TM, Lockery SR (1999) <i>The Fundamental Role of Pirouettes in </i>C. elegans<i> Chemotaxis</i>. The journal of Neuroscience, 19(21):9557-9569<br> | Pierce-Shimomura JT, Morse TM, Lockery SR (1999) <i>The Fundamental Role of Pirouettes in </i>C. elegans<i> Chemotaxis</i>. The journal of Neuroscience, 19(21):9557-9569<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <html> | ||
| + | </div><div class="tab-pane fade" id="Group"> | ||
| + | </html> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Group behaviour == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <html> | ||
| + | </div><div class="tab-pane fade" id="System"> | ||
| + | </html> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == System performance == | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
Revision as of 18:34, 13 August 2013
Contents |
Modeling
The main goal in our modelling project is to accurately predict the behaviour of our system in several issues, from the mounting of bacteria on C. elegans to the performance of our worms reaching the place of interest. In order to do that, we use several modeling techniques.
The movement of C. elegans in the presence of a chemoattractant in order to carry our bacteria to that source is the main issue of our project, so we consider modeling this aspect and employing it as scaffold for the whole modeling project. Several layers show up that it must be modeled in different ways. In our approach, we mathematically describe each layer, from the simplest to the most complex, integrating each one.
Biobricks modeling
Modeling of the biobricks performance
Chemotaxis
In the first place, we model C. elegans behaviour in the absence of chemoattractant and bacteria. When no chemotactic source is present, C. elegans moves randomly. This behaviour can be modeled as a random walk (Berg,1993) and can be simulated in several steps using a programming language, such as Matlab. The equations of this model are the following:
Add equations
Simulations were performed in Matlab, proceeding as described in (Pierce-Shimomura et al., 1999). We developed our own script based on the article, obtaining similar results.
Add simulations
However, we are interested in the movement of the nematode in a gradient of a chemoattractant. In presence of a chemotactic source,C. elegans moves in a similiar fashion as E. coli (Bangmann, 2006), a mechanism called the pirouette model (Pierce-Shimomura et al., 1999). Following this model, we defined the pirouette initiation rate as a function of dC/dt. Simulations were performed, showing a bias in the random walk, as expected:
Add simulations
Bangmann CI (2006) Chemosensation in C. elegans. Wormbook
Berg HC (1993) Random walks in biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
Pierce-Shimomura JT, Morse TM, Lockery SR (1999) The Fundamental Role of Pirouettes in C. elegans Chemotaxis. The journal of Neuroscience, 19(21):9557-9569
Group behaviour
System performance
