Team:Virginia/Chassis Improvements

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 300: Line 300:
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d2/Vgemail2.png" width="500">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d2/Vgemail2.png" width="500">
<p>Our research led us to the Ail protein from <i>Yersinia enterocolitica</i>. Ail is just one of three invasion proteins cloned from <i>Yersinia</i> species, invasin probably being the most widely known.  When present on <i>E. coli</i>, Ail confers a phenotype of attachment and invasion, though invasion is primarily limited to epithelial tissue. These qualities already make Ail an attractive protein for enhancing minicells role as a delivery vehicle, but they are not the primary reasons we chose to use it. Ail was also found to have both structural and functional homology with outer membrane proteins like Rck of <i>Salmonella typhimurium</i>, which grants high-level serum resistance. The serum resistance Ail grants to <i>E. coli</i> helps prevent the activation of the complement cascade—a primary defense mechanism of the immune system. The binding of complement proteins to bacteria usually spells their end: it triggers inflammation, draws phagocytic cells, facilitates phagocytosis, induces cell lysis, and coordinates opsonization by antibodies. By protecting our minicells from destruction, we can improve the chances of successful payload delivery and simultaneously reduce the risk of septic shock.</p>
<p>Our research led us to the Ail protein from <i>Yersinia enterocolitica</i>. Ail is just one of three invasion proteins cloned from <i>Yersinia</i> species, invasin probably being the most widely known.  When present on <i>E. coli</i>, Ail confers a phenotype of attachment and invasion, though invasion is primarily limited to epithelial tissue. These qualities already make Ail an attractive protein for enhancing minicells role as a delivery vehicle, but they are not the primary reasons we chose to use it. Ail was also found to have both structural and functional homology with outer membrane proteins like Rck of <i>Salmonella typhimurium</i>, which grants high-level serum resistance. The serum resistance Ail grants to <i>E. coli</i> helps prevent the activation of the complement cascade—a primary defense mechanism of the immune system. The binding of complement proteins to bacteria usually spells their end: it triggers inflammation, draws phagocytic cells, facilitates phagocytosis, induces cell lysis, and coordinates opsonization by antibodies. By protecting our minicells from destruction, we can improve the chances of successful payload delivery and simultaneously reduce the risk of septic shock.</p>
 +
<br>
 +
<p>We are currently conducting a human complement binding assay to test the blocking efficacy of both Ail and PSA (see protocols).</p>
<p><center>The Ail plasmid we used for this purpose, pVM102, was a courteous gift of Dr. Virginia L. Miller.  </center></p>
<p><center>The Ail plasmid we used for this purpose, pVM102, was a courteous gift of Dr. Virginia L. Miller.  </center></p>
 +
<br><br>
<br><br>
<p>Sources:
<p>Sources:

Revision as of 23:51, 27 October 2013

VGEM Welcomes You!

Chassis Improvements - BioSafety

Polysialic Acid

The K1 strain of E. coli produces and encapsulates itself in alpha-2,8-linked polysialic acid (PSA), a polysaccharide that biochemically mimics the human glycoprotein Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (NCAM). This similarity renders virulent K1 E. coli poorly immunogenic in humans because they aren’t seen as foreign and are therefore cloaked from antibody opsonization and complement-mediated killing. Clearly, equipping our minicells with such protection would be highly advantageous for improving their successful delivery rate and reducing harmful immune responses.

A significant amount of machinery (14 genes in total) is required to generate the PSA capsule in K1 E. coli and transferring this ability over to the comparatively docile K12 E. coli is quite the feat. Thankfully, we were able to find previous work by Dr. Eric Vimr that accomplished just that and obtained a single pSR23 plasmid that contains all the required genes. We are currently in the process of confirming the presence of PSA on our K12 E. coli via antibody-labeled fluorescence microscopy.



Sources:

  • Whitfield, C. (2006). Biosynthesis and assembly of capsular polysaccharides in Escherichia coli. Annual review of biochemistry, 75, 39–68. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142545
  • Ferrero, M. A., & Aparicio, L. R. (2010). Biosynthesis and production of polysialic acids in bacteria. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 86(6), 1621–35. doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2531-5
  • Zhan, X., Zhu, L., Wu, J., Zhen, Z., & Jia, W. (2002). Production of polysialic acid from fed-batch fermentation with pH control. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 11(2-3), 201–204. doi:10.1016/S1369-703X(02)00026-8
  • Rode, B., Endres, C., Ran, C., Stahl, F., Beutel, S., Kasper, C., Galuska, S., et al. (2008). Large-scale production and homogenous purification of long chain polysialic acids from E. coli K1. Journal of biotechnology, 135(2), 202–9. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.03.012
  • Andreishcheva, E. N., & Vann, W. F. (2008). Gene Products Required for De Novo Synthesis of Polysialic Acid in Escherichia coli K1, 188(5), 1786–1797. doi:10.1128/JB.188.5.1786
  • Vimr, E. R. (1992). Selective synthesis and labeling of the polysialic acid capsule in Escherichia coli K1 strains with mutations in nanA and neuB. Journal of bacteriology, 174(19), 6191–7. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=207687&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  • Ail

    The 3D structure of the Ail Protein (PDB).

    Ironically, in order to make our minicells as non-toxic and safe as possible we had to look toward the likes of the bacteria that caused the Black Plague. While it may seem strange, bacteria that have such success when infecting the human body have developed the best ways to avoid the traps of the immune system. For our innocuous minicells, the only source of harm to the body would come from an overreaction of its own immune system. Therefore, equipping our minicells with the immunoevasive tools of virulent bacteria actually makes them less harmful.

    Our research led us to the Ail protein from Yersinia enterocolitica. Ail is just one of three invasion proteins cloned from Yersinia species, invasin probably being the most widely known. When present on E. coli, Ail confers a phenotype of attachment and invasion, though invasion is primarily limited to epithelial tissue. These qualities already make Ail an attractive protein for enhancing minicells role as a delivery vehicle, but they are not the primary reasons we chose to use it. Ail was also found to have both structural and functional homology with outer membrane proteins like Rck of Salmonella typhimurium, which grants high-level serum resistance. The serum resistance Ail grants to E. coli helps prevent the activation of the complement cascade—a primary defense mechanism of the immune system. The binding of complement proteins to bacteria usually spells their end: it triggers inflammation, draws phagocytic cells, facilitates phagocytosis, induces cell lysis, and coordinates opsonization by antibodies. By protecting our minicells from destruction, we can improve the chances of successful payload delivery and simultaneously reduce the risk of septic shock.


    We are currently conducting a human complement binding assay to test the blocking efficacy of both Ail and PSA (see protocols).

    The Ail plasmid we used for this purpose, pVM102, was a courteous gift of Dr. Virginia L. Miller.



    Sources:

  • Miller, V. L., & Falkow, S. (1988). Evidence for two genetic loci in Yersinia enterocolitica that can promote invasion of epithelial cells. Infection and immunity, 56(5), 1242–8. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=259798&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  • Wachtel, M. R., & Miller, V. L. (1995). In vitro and in vivo characterization of an ail mutant of Yersinia enterocolitica. Infection and immunity, 63(7), 2541–8. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=173340&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  • IpxM Strain

    With our FtsZ biobrick, minicells can be created in virtually any strain of E. coli. This allows us to choose strains that are best suited for a minicell’s purpose: safe delivery of contents. The use of traditionali E. coli strains is naturally limited in that regard, due to the toxic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) component of their outer membranes. LPS is a crucial part of Gram-negative bacteria’s structural integrity and also plays a protective role against certain chemicals and immune effectors. However, it is extremely endotoxic, evoking a strong immune response in human that can result in septic shock. It was found that hexa-acylated LPS is the trigger in humans, recognized by the human toll-like receptor 4 (hTLR4) and myeloid differentiation factor-2 (MD-2) complex. This complex activates the NF-kappaB transcription factor, leading to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and eventually septic shock.

    Thankfully, strains of E. coli have already been made to deal with this toxicity without significantly compromising the structural integrity of the bacteria. One such strain includes a mutation in the lpxM gene, which codes for a late-stage myristoyl transferase essential for the addition of secondary acyl chains on the Lipid A portion of LPS. This prevents the toxic hexa-acylation of LPS and exhibited a 10-fold reduction of toxicity in a murine model. We were able to obtain the lpxM mutant strain from the Yale E. coli stock center for use in our experiments. Recently, it was brought to our attention that a new strain, dubbed “Clear Coli”, utilizes six additional genetic mutations to further lower the risks of immunogenicity. While the strain is relatively new, the results are very promising with >95% reductions in endotoxin response in a Limulus amebocyte lysate test. In the future, we hope to use “Clear Coli” as our standard for minicell production.



    Sources:

  • Anisimov, A. P., Shaikhutdinova, R. Z., Pan’kina, L. N., Feodorova, V. a, Savostina, E. P., Bystrova, O. V, Lindner, B., et al. (2007). Effect of deletion of the lpxM gene on virulence and vaccine potential of Yersinia pestis in mice. Journal of medical microbiology, 56(Pt 4), 443–53. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.46880-0
  • Mamat, U., Woodard, R. W., Wilke, K., Souvignier, C., Mead, D., Steinmetz, E., Kovacich, C., et al. (2013). Endotoxin-free protein production — ClearColi TM technology. Nature Publishing Group, 10(9), iii–iv. doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.367
  • Giacalone, Matthew J., and Michael J. Newman. Therapeutic Compositions and Methods for Antibody and Fc-containing Targeting Molecule-based Targeted Delivery of Bioactive Molecules by Bacterial Minicells. Vaxiion Therapeutics, Inc., assignee. Patent US 20120207754 A1. 16 Aug. 2012. Print.
  • Future Applications

    Targeting

    Previous researchers who have worked on minicells have attached Protein A/G Fc receptors to an OmpA autotransporter located on the surface of minicells. This patented approach allowed them to add antibodies specific to their target host cell to purified minicells, thereby creating targeted minicells. Additionally, the antibody coating serves to protect the minicells from the host immune system and induce endocytosis when binding to certain target cell receptors. Such a modular targeting system is ideal for such a versatile vector. We hope to create a similar system that allows our minicells utilize the vast library of commercial antibodies available as highly specific receptors for a variety of applications.



    Sources:

  • Giacalone, Matthew J., and Michael J. Newman. Therapeutic Compositions and Methods for Antibody and Fc-containing Targeting Molecule-based Targeted Delivery of Bioactive Molecules by Bacterial Minicells. Vaxiion Therapeutics, Inc., assignee. Patent US 20120207754 A1. 16 Aug. 2012. Print.
  • MacDiarmid, J. a, & Brahmbhatt, H. (2011). Minicells: versatile vectors for targeted drug or si/shRNA cancer therapy. Current opinion in biotechnology, 22(6), 909–16. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.008
  •