"
Team:Wellesley Desyne/Notebook/TiffanyNotebook
From 2013.igem.org
Tiff.w.chen (Talk | contribs) (→Week 5: June 24 - June 28) |
Tiff.w.chen (Talk | contribs) (→Week 6: July 1 - July 5) |
||
| Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
==Week 6: July 1 - July 5== | ==Week 6: July 1 - July 5== | ||
| - | '''Monday:''' | + | '''Monday:''' We have decided to make Eugenie into a surface application rather than a web application based on the limitations we have discovered while attempting to develop Eugenie as a web-application. It's time to dust off the C# hats. Together, the Eugenie team discussed the backend coding that would be required for creating the surface application. |
| - | '''Tuesday:''' | + | '''Tuesday:''' We created a paper prototype for the surface application version of Eugenie, and created a video to show to the BU iGem team. Then we began trying to fix the drag-and-drop in the surface application in the afternoon. |
'''Wednesday:''' | '''Wednesday:''' | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 2 July 2013
Tiffany's Notebook
Contents |
Week 1: May 28 - May 31
Tuesday: First day of the iGem summer program in the HCI lab at Wellesley College! I've worked through the majority of the assigned readings. I was assigned to work on the Eugene DeSyne team along with Catherine, Evan, and Sravanti.
Thursday: The team went to MIT for a BioBuilder workshop with Natalie Kuldell, but as a graduating senior, I had previous obligations and did not attend. According to the rest of the team, it was an interesting day.
Friday: Graduation Day! I received my BA in Biological Sciences.
Week 2: June 3 - June 7
Monday: The whole Wellesley iGem team went to Boston University to meet with the BU iGem team and learn more about the biology behind synthetic biology. As a biological sciences major, it was a bit of a relief to listen to some biology concepts that were easy to understand compared to the computer science ones that I was learning very slowly as I went along. We learned about Eugene, the coding language that the BU iGem team currently uses to find the possible permutations for their synthetic biology circuits. The Wellesley and BU iGem teams split up into mixed teams to try and code some example circuits into Eugene ourselves.
Tuesday: Day two of BU iGem, we presented our projects to the BU team. We asked them to give us their comments and suggestions about how we could more tailor our projects our audience. Some aspects of our projects were met with a little bit of skepticism and criticism, but the Wellesley team took it in stride because we were still in the design process and things were still in the process of changing.
Wednesday: Today, Sravanti joined the Eugene Desyne team! The team began to work on paper prototypes for the user interface we wanted for the project. I did not spend too long working on this as I needed to help conduct gesture studies for another project, Tabula. For the gesture studies, we asked participants to pretend to conduct certain tasks using either an upright or a horizontal touch interface along with Sifteo cubes, and recorded their thought processes and gestures. I was mainly responsible for recording the gestures and created a form to record everything in as uniform a manner as possible. As we went through the three user studies for the day, I noticed how I changed in how I chose to record gestures in order to record more quickly and accurately.
Thursday: More user-studies for Tabula. While there are a set of very common gestures that people generally use, there are certain individuals that approach the tasks that they are set to in a very interesting manner that we do not see from any of the other participants thus far. Also, as a lab at a women's college, we have certain difficulties in recruiting enough cis-gender males to participate in our studies so we have been using our personal connections to try and rustle some up.
Friday: Yet more user-studies for tabula.
Week 3: June 10 - June 14
Monday: We successfully finished the Tabula user-studies! I went through all the gestures I recorded for all participants and made sure things were recorded as uniformly as possible for the sake of easing the way during data analysis. I was not responsible for analyzing the data. That honor fell to Diana and Consuelo. The Eugene Desyne team continued to refine their UI design and came up with a new one, influenced by UML, that utilizes tree visualization in showing the build of the parts.
Tuesday: Together, the Eugene Desyne team refined the tree visualization method for rule creation in creating devices. We worked through how we would represent some example circuits provided by Swapnil. Even now, we can see that we are going to need some more examples of more complicated circuits to work through.
Wednesday: Our PI, Orit, really liked our proposed design. From my perspective, as a biology major, there was some good stuff already where the our design would be more convenient to use than being forced to code it in Eugene. Catherine came up with the name for our UI, Eugenie! The logo includes a genie lamp and a little bacteria genie coming out of it. It's very cute!
Thursday: We continued to work to brainstorm and refine our designs for our joint brainstorming session on Friday with the BU iGem team. We met with Orit to go over everything. One of the things were struggled with was how to represent our data once it was created. We decided we could either go with a list, or display data visually. Displaying the data visually presented a problem because with all the permutations that are supposed to be generated in using Eugenie will result in an unmanageably large amount of data to represent. As a preliminary design, we came up with either a tree representation or a pile representation.
Friday: Joint brainstorming session with BU today. People really liked our idea for the Eugenie logo. People seemed to prefer the tree visualization method. The unanimous opinion was that data should just be displayed in a huge list that one could browse through and filter for certain results if desired. It was good to get feedback from everyone. I think some members of the BU team were forgetting that I focused mostly on molecular biology in my undergraduate coursework and research. They repetitively explained the same things in great detail to me. I appreciate their attention to detail, but it was a little baffling because they did not seem to believe that I really understood what they were saying.
Week 4: June 17 - June 21
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:
Week 5: June 24 - June 28
Monday:
Tuesday:
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:
Week 6: July 1 - July 5
Monday: We have decided to make Eugenie into a surface application rather than a web application based on the limitations we have discovered while attempting to develop Eugenie as a web-application. It's time to dust off the C# hats. Together, the Eugenie team discussed the backend coding that would be required for creating the surface application.
Tuesday: We created a paper prototype for the surface application version of Eugenie, and created a video to show to the BU iGem team. Then we began trying to fix the drag-and-drop in the surface application in the afternoon.
Wednesday:
Thursday:
Friday:
