Team:Goettingen/NoteBook w1

From 2013.igem.org

07th

Plasmid mini-prep for Part1-7

Cryo-Stocks of E. coli transformants (C1, parts 1 – 7):

·         900 μl E.coli ON culture + 100 μl DMSO 100% in special tubes (ask Katrin or Katrin^^)

·         vortex

·         store at – 70 °C (red box)

Backup plates:

Storage at 4 °C

 

Plasmid Mini-Preparation of parts 1 - 7:

ON cultures of C1 for parts 1 – 7 with kit “NucleoSpin? Plasmid” von Macherery-Nagel according to manual pp. 16-17 (NucleoSpin? Plasmid protocol for purification of high copy plasmids)

Step 5: recommended washing of silica membrane with buffer AW was performed

Step 7: Elution with buffer AE pre-heated to 50 – 60 °C (in future: DON’T elute with this buffer, use pre-heated HPLC-H2O instead! No one knows what’s inside the buffer and its components (EDTA?) could interfere with sequencing and other reactions)

 

NanoDrop – Plasmid concentrations

Part no.

c(DNA) [ng/μl]

A260/A280

A260/A230

1

84.6

1.94

2.18

2

79.8

1.94

2.10

3

151.0

1.89

2.24

4

29.5

1.91

2.07

5

154.9

1.88

2.25

6

88.9

1.92

2.08

7

5.9

14.08

1.87

Stored in red box at - 20°C

Primers arrived!

iGEM_32 ~ 37: dissolved in HPLC water, stored at -20oC in our box

100uM stock , for PCR dilute 1:20 in HPLC water.

Primer 32 and 33 are strong in forming 2nd structures, increase the amount in PCR

Fold ↑

Preparation of cryo-cultures of #811, 814, 1011, 1012 and 1013

Preparation of cryo-cultures of #811, 814, 1011, 1012 and 1013

preparation of cryo-cultures:

- take 900 μl of overnight culture

- add 100 μl 100% DMSO (filter sterile)

→ store at - 80°C

 

Fold ↑

06th

Pick the colonies of part1-7

Media preparation:

1000ml LB+Ampicillin Agar => ca. 50 Plates (Black Code)

Transformation:

Number

whereabout

B0034

P5 2 M

Colonies on the plate: parts 1- 7:

4ml LB with antibiotics, overnight culture for mini-prep[C1]

Backup plates: C1,C2,C3 for each part

Fold ↑

Continue of transformation of competent E. coli cells with pGP172 + cdaA (from #81) and pGP172 + DAC (from #101)

Continue of transformation of competent E. coli cells with pGP172 + cdaA (from #81) and pGP172 + DAC (from #101)

only clones #811 and #814 (expressing pGP172 + cdaA) grew overnight

→ inoculate them in liquid LB media

→ grow normally in LB media clones # 1011, 1012, 1013 were directly inoculated in liquid LB medium

 

Fold ↑

05th

Preparation of the medium, antibioticks, Transformation.

Preparation of Antibiotic Stocks

1000x Ampicillin 10 1mL Stocks (Freezer red box)

1000x Chloramphenicol 10mL Stock (Falcon in Freezer)

Media preparation:

 250ml *4 Chl

 [use the ones marked with “5th..6.13 LBchl” on EVERY plate first. ]*

 250ml *1 Amp  (marked with black)

primer design<ordered>

iGEM_36

DarR operator sequence + prefix

iGEM_37

DarR operator sequence + suffix

Transformation:

Number

Mark

J23117

1

J23116

2

J23110

3

J23118

4

J61101

5

BBa_BE0240-Chl

6 ---Chl

BBa_B0015

7----Chl

B0034

8

Resuspended DNA from iGEM kit (already stored in red box in -20 frigde):

Number

whereabout

BBa_E0204-Amp

P5 12 M

BBa_QO3121

P5 20 N

Fold ↑

Transformation of GP 911

 

 

Transformation of GP 911

·         According to the protocoll of AG Stülke

o   Started at 8.00; OD600 = 1.4 at 11.00h

o   For the expression mix, the CSE supernatant was used instead of water.

Results:

 

Macintosh HD:Users:jangundlach:Dropbox:Sam, Jan:LabBook:Bilder LabbBook 1:130605_Ergenisse erste Trafe:130605_Feeding_1.tif

controls on LB medium, containig the appropriate AB.
left: neg. control: 991 + water
right: pos. Control: 991 + BP121 (another cat cassette)

 

Macintosh HD:Users:jangundlach:Dropbox:Sam, Jan:LabBook:Bilder LabbBook 1:130605_Ergenisse erste Trafe:130605_Feeding_2.tif

the pos. control on LB medium with sterile filtrated supernatant

 

 

Macintosh HD:Users:jangundlach:Dropbox:Sam, Jan:LabBook:Bilder LabbBook 1:130605_Ergenisse erste Trafe:130605_Feeding_3.tif

the pos. control on LB medium with cooked and sterile filtrated supernatant

 

 

·         No growth of the actual experiment on these plates (GP 991 + GP 997)

·         This might be due to the fact that the expression mix, used during the trafo, contained the supernatant containing all three antibiotics (E/L, tet, cat)

o   Redo this next week with supernatant lacking the AB’s

Fold ↑

Continue of transformation of competent E.coli cells with pGP172 + cdaA (from #81) and pGP172 + DAC (from #101)

Continue of transformation of competent E. coli cells with pGP172 + cdaA (from #81) and pGP172 + DAC (from #101)

E. coli cells expressing pGP172 + cdaA (from #81) are growing very slowly and have to be incubated longer

→ chose four clones and name them: #811, 812, 813 and 814

→ re-streak the om LB Amp100 plates

E. coli cells expressing pGP172 + DAC (from #101) are growing normally

→ chose three clones and name them: #1011, 1012 and 1013

 

Fold ↑

04th

Find the correct DNA sequence of DarR and primer design

primer design<ordered>, found the correct sequence for DarR

iGEM_32

Primer DarR + Prefix forw.

iGEM_33

Primer DarR + Suffix rev.

iGEM_34

Primer DarR sequencing forw.

iGEM_35

Primer DarR sequencing rev.

Fold ↑

Creation of c-di-AMP supernatant, which is used for the plates

Creation of c-di-AMP supernatant, which is used for the plates

 

·         - growth curve of 168 in CSE:
9.00h:     0,1
11.00h:   0.37/0.384
12.00h:   0.72/0.71
12.30h:   0.99/0.95

·         continued as described on 29.05.13

o   Addition: the prepared falcons containing the 25 ml supernatant were preheated in the 37 °C room. That’s makes pouring the plates easier

 

Fold ↑

Sequencing of plasmids from clone #81 and #101
Transformation of competent E. colicells with pGP172 + cdaA (from #81) and pGP172 + DAC (from #101)

Sequencing of plasmids from clone #81 and #101

Component

81F

81R

101f

101R

DNA

10

10

10

10

Forward primer

4

-

4

-

Reverse primer

-

4

-

4

Total

14

14

14

14

 Sent for sequencing!

 

Transformation of competent E. coli cells with pGP172 + cdaA (from #81) and pGP172 + DAC (from #101)

Transform competent E. coli cells according to the protocoll mentioned above (30.05.2913) with pGP172 + cdaA or pGP172 + DAC, respectively.

For the transformation were 5 μl of plasmid DNA used. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C.

 

Fold ↑

03rd

Gel electrophoresis of colony PCR from 31.05.2013
Digestion of pGP172 + cdaA (L. monocytogenes) and pGP172 + DAC domain (L. monocytogenes) with SacI and BamHI

Gel electrophoresis of colony PCR from 31.05.2013

The obtained PCR products were analyszed on 1% agarose gel. Clones #81 – #90 should contain pGP172 + cdaA (L. monocytogenes). Clones #101 – #110 should obtain pGP172 + DAC domain (L. monocytogenes). Therefore a band of about 900 bp were expected for clones #81 – #90 and a band of about 600 bp for clones #101 - #110

Gel: Marker (100 bp ladder) | clones #81 – #90 | clones #101 – #102 | Marker (1kb ladder)

Gel: Marker (100 bp ladder) | clones #103 – #110 | control (w/o insert)

For all clones could be a specific band and therefore also a specific PCR product were obtained. The plasmids from clone #81 and #101 were extracted and purified by peqlab Miniprep kit according to the manufacturer's protocoll.

→ The concentration was measured by NanoDrop: 81/cdaA (L. monocytogenes): 27 ng/μl 101/DAC domain (L. monocytogenes): 27 ng/μl

 

Digestion of pGP172 + cdaA (L. monocytogenes) and pGP172 + DAC domain (L. monocytogenes) with SacI and BamHI

Components

pGP172 + cdaA

 pGP172 + DAC domain

Plasmid (300 ng)

11.1

11.1

SacI

1

1

BamHI

1

1

Fast Digest Buffer

1

1

HPLC H2O

5.9

5.9

Total

20

20

The digestion products were analyzed on 1% agarose gel.

Gel: Marker (100 bp) | undigested pGP172 | cdaA insert | DAC insert | ligation control | digested pGP172 + cdA | digested pGP172 + DAC

The digested plasmids show bands for the undigested pGP172, for the corresponding insert as well as a band for the undigested pGP172 including the insert. Furthermore could be an additional band in the ligation control as well as in the digested pGP172 + cdA and the digested pGP172 + DAC observed. This could be due to unspecific digestion or the digestion by only one enzyme. Therefore the cloning seems to be successful and should be further verified by sequencing!

 

 

Fold ↑