Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/CholeraDetection/Springexp/Period4/Dailylog

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "{{TeamBYUProvo}} <br> {| width="100%" | colspan="3" | <font color="#333399" size="5" font face="Calibri"> '''Cholera Detection May - June Notebook: May 27 - June 9 Daily Log'''...")
 
(4 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
{| width="100%"
{| width="100%"
-
| colspan="3" | <font color="#333399" size="5" font face="Calibri"> '''Cholera Detection May - June Notebook: May 27 - June 9 Daily Log'''</font>
+
| colspan="3" | <font color="#333399" size="5" font face="Calibri">  
 +
 
 +
: '''Cholera Detection May - June Notebook: June 10 - June 23 Daily Log'''</font>
<br>
<br>
Line 10: Line 12:
|- valign="top"
|- valign="top"
-
| style="width: 18%; background-color: transparent;"|
+
| style="width: 22%; background-color: transparent;"|
<font color="#333399" size="3" font face="Calibri">
<font color="#333399" size="3" font face="Calibri">
-
: [[Team:BYU_Provo/Cholera_-_Detection|Overview]]
+
<font size = "4">
 +
 
 +
: <u> '''Cholera Detection''' </u> </font>
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/Cholera_-_Detection/Winterexp|March-April]]
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/Cholera_-_Detection/Winterexp|March-April]]
Line 34: Line 38:
KK, KP
KK, KP
 +
We ran our PCR product on a gel - this was the product of the PCR reaction with the new, correct, CRO primers. Despite this, our gel showed one, thick band at the bottom of the gel, but no 300 base pair band. We streaked out TT9901 and TT9907 and TT25281 fresh from the stabs to use as template on our next attempt, and Dr. Grose is going to do it with us.
<br>
<br>
Line 39: Line 44:
<font size="4"> '''6/12/13''' </font>
<font size="4"> '''6/12/13''' </font>
-
-KP KK Today we plated TT9907 and TT9901. We plated them on LB arabinose/amp/x-gal plates. We plated different concentrations of TT9907 and TT9901 on each of the plates. We added 50, 100, and 300 microliters onto each plate. We will check the plates tomorrow hopefully to find plaques showing that arabinose triggered lysis of our lambda. We unfortunately didn't get any growth of our TT25821, so we streaked another plate from our original stab sample and we will try to re-electroporate TT23821 on Friday.
+
KK, KP
 +
Dr. Grose helped us prepare PCR again. We're running PCR with both a negative control AND a positive control - a template and primers that Dr. Grose proved yesterday work. We changed to annealing temperature to 69 C on our phusion program and we added DMSO, which we had never added before. DMSO helps to separate G-C rich sequences. We're learning to anticipate the lab work we'll need to do in the future. Today we also made the gel with which we'll check our products on Wednesday, and we purified 100 microL of the  plasmid pIG12 at a concentration of 116 ng/microL. This is the plasmid into which we'll be cloning CRO.
 +
 
 +
Redge sent us 8 hilarious sketches of Baxter Bacteria and his pet Vector. I'm thrilled that this children's book is going to be a lot of fun! I told Redge to being his illustrative work already.
<br>
<br>
Line 46: Line 54:
KK, KP
KK, KP
-
NO! Our work over these past few weeks reached its climax today ... we checked our plates, but no dice. No plaques, that is. Lambda was not induced out of lysogeny. We are asking ourselves these questions: Was CRO not actually ligated into our vector? Are our plates not good (we used year old plates)? CRO, when overexpressed, downregulates itself; is there too high a concentration of CRO? Or is it possible that CRO alone isn't a sufficient factor to induce lysis. Dr. Grose talked with us, and told us she had our sequencing!! The results were depressing but revelatory: the sequence for CRO is not in our vector! So, on Monday we will begin the cloning process again. Today we set up a PCR reaction to amplify CRO from strains TT9901 and TT9907 template DNA.
+
 
 +
We showed, finally, a positive result for our PCR! We amplified CRO! We had limited time today, but we performed a PCR clean-up with a kit from Dr. Grose's lab, and then we set the restriction digest of CRO and of pIG12 with PST-1 and EcoR-1. I made a low-melt gel to use tomorrow, after which we'll perform the ligation.
<br>
<br>
Line 52: Line 61:
<font size="4"> '''6/17/13''' </font>
<font size="4"> '''6/17/13''' </font>
-
-KK KP Our PCR product was consistent with every other attempt to amplify CRO: it failed. Consistency is only a virtue if you're not a screw-up :) Anyway, our gel showed a faint band at the 300 base pair level, but too faint to be considered successful. We considered a list of reasons why our PCR reaction is failing and discussed them with Dr. Grose:
+
KK, KP,
-
We boiled our template DNA for 10 minutes, but Dr. Grose recommends 5 minutes
+
When we ran CRO and our plasmid on the low melt gel, we saw a beautiful band where CRO should be, but no distinct band of the plasmid. So, we set up another digest reaction of the plasmid and we saved part of our low-melt gel to run the plasmid tomorrow. TUESDAY 6/18/ We cut out the plasmid from the low melt gel, ligated it with the insert, waited an hour and a half, and then did a transformation of the plasmid into E.Coli to grow a lot of it. The E.Coli plates should be ready tomorrow.
-
We added 1 microliter of template; Dr. Grose likes to add 2 microliters.
+
-
We did not use a master mix to combine our reagents with our template DNA. We added each reagent individually to each tube. Because we are pipetting such small volumes, there is a lot of room for error this way.
+
-
The Phusion program we used was set to an annealing temperature that was 1 degree too low for Phusion.
+
-
We did the PCR reaction one more time with Dr. Grose. Tomorrow we expect to see an enormous, fat, band!
+
<br>
<br>
Line 63: Line 68:
<font size="4"> '''6/19/13''' </font>
<font size="4"> '''6/19/13''' </font>
-
Regarding our PCR attempt yesterday, we did see a thick fat band ... at the bottom of the gel! Once again our PCR failed. This has led us to propose several reasons why we can't PCR amplify CRO: 1) the Lambda prophage isn't actually in TT 9901 or TT9907, or 2) our primers aren’t functioning to amplify CRO. We streaked a few plates of TT9901 and TT9907 to subject to UV light. If we see plaques, then we will know Lambda has been induced. Meanwhile Dr. Grose is going to check that our primers are the correct ones.
+
KK, KP
 +
Clarice returned today! The transformation of the ligated plasmid (pIG12 + CRO gene insert) was ready today. Our plates showed good results - there were few colonies and NO colonies on our control plate. We set up 8 colony PCR reactions and a control. We'll have the results by Friday.
<br>
<br>
Line 70: Line 76:
KK, KP
KK, KP
-
After a little investigation, it turns out our primers were NOT for the CRO gene in Lambda, but for the CRO gene in another phage. Dr. Grose immediately ordered another set of primers, which arrived this morning! With the correct primers to amplify CRO, we performed the PCR protocol again today. Also, we set up an overnight of E.Coli with pIG12 to purify the plasmid tomorrow. We'll use pIG12 as our vector.
 
-
Our community project will be writing a children's book on synthetic biology. I wrote a story line which was distributed among all the team members; with their ideas I'm going to make changes and contact Redge Ballard, our illustrator. Since we hope to do our community project in one month, hopefully he can illustrate the story in such a short time!
 
<br>
<br>

Latest revision as of 03:19, 23 September 2013


Cholera Detection May - June Notebook: June 10 - June 23 Daily Log



Cholera Detection
March-April
May-June
July-August
September-October

6/10/13

KK, KP

We ran our PCR product on a gel - this was the product of the PCR reaction with the new, correct, CRO primers. Despite this, our gel showed one, thick band at the bottom of the gel, but no 300 base pair band. We streaked out TT9901 and TT9907 and TT25281 fresh from the stabs to use as template on our next attempt, and Dr. Grose is going to do it with us.


6/12/13

KK, KP Dr. Grose helped us prepare PCR again. We're running PCR with both a negative control AND a positive control - a template and primers that Dr. Grose proved yesterday work. We changed to annealing temperature to 69 C on our phusion program and we added DMSO, which we had never added before. DMSO helps to separate G-C rich sequences. We're learning to anticipate the lab work we'll need to do in the future. Today we also made the gel with which we'll check our products on Wednesday, and we purified 100 microL of the plasmid pIG12 at a concentration of 116 ng/microL. This is the plasmid into which we'll be cloning CRO.

Redge sent us 8 hilarious sketches of Baxter Bacteria and his pet Vector. I'm thrilled that this children's book is going to be a lot of fun! I told Redge to being his illustrative work already.


6/14/13

KK, KP

We showed, finally, a positive result for our PCR! We amplified CRO! We had limited time today, but we performed a PCR clean-up with a kit from Dr. Grose's lab, and then we set the restriction digest of CRO and of pIG12 with PST-1 and EcoR-1. I made a low-melt gel to use tomorrow, after which we'll perform the ligation.


6/17/13

KK, KP, When we ran CRO and our plasmid on the low melt gel, we saw a beautiful band where CRO should be, but no distinct band of the plasmid. So, we set up another digest reaction of the plasmid and we saved part of our low-melt gel to run the plasmid tomorrow. TUESDAY 6/18/ We cut out the plasmid from the low melt gel, ligated it with the insert, waited an hour and a half, and then did a transformation of the plasmid into E.Coli to grow a lot of it. The E.Coli plates should be ready tomorrow.


6/19/13

KK, KP Clarice returned today! The transformation of the ligated plasmid (pIG12 + CRO gene insert) was ready today. Our plates showed good results - there were few colonies and NO colonies on our control plate. We set up 8 colony PCR reactions and a control. We'll have the results by Friday.


6/21/13

KK, KP