"
Team:Tsinghua-E/Part1
From 2013.igem.org
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> | <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> | ||
<style type="text/css"> | <style type="text/css"> | ||
| - | #content{height: | + | #content{height:1700px;} |
p{font-size:120%} | p{font-size:120%} | ||
.memberx {position:absolute;top:60px;left:5px;height：215px;width;300px;} | .memberx {position:absolute;top:60px;left:5px;height：215px;width;300px;} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| - | <div class="tmc" style="height: | + | <div class="tmc" style="height:1585px;"> |
</div> | </div> | ||
| - | <div class="neirong" style="height: | + | <div class="neirong" style="height:1565px;"> |
</html> | </html> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<p align="center"><br /> | <p align="center"><br /> | ||
<img border="0" width="446" src="/wiki/images/7/70/Part1I.png" /> <br /> | <img border="0" width="446" src="/wiki/images/7/70/Part1I.png" /> <br /> | ||
| - | Figure. | + | Figure.1 rifampicin reversion mutants caused by <em>mutD</em> expression and the counts by agar plate<br /> |
<img border="0" width="446" src="/wiki/images/a/a3/Part1II.png" /> <br /> | <img border="0" width="446" src="/wiki/images/a/a3/Part1II.png" /> <br /> | ||
| - | Figure. | + | Figure.2 Conception illustration of the working mechanism of <em>mutD</em></p> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
Revision as of 15:56, 23 September 2013
Part 1: THU-E Mutation Part
A plasmid used for the construction of high-diversity library in vivo ingenome level. In this vector, highly error-prone dnaQ mutant, mutD1was cloned downstream of araBAD promoter to control the mutation rate of the target genome by the concentration of araBAD promoter’s inducer, L-arabinose, in a strict manner.E. Coli JM109 carrying different vectors of pBAD_B0030-mutD-sfGFP, pBAD_B0032-mutD-sfGFP and pBAD_SDA_RBS-mutD-sfGFP(this RBS sequence was derived from the RBS sequence upstream of sfGFP in original AraC_pBAD_CI_OR222-sfGFP vector2)were constructed. By detecting the induced fluorescence intensity, we found that pBAD_B0030-mutD-sfGFP, andpBAD_SDA_RBS-mutD- sfGFPhave relatively higher mutD expression. The increaseof mutation rate induced by our mutation part was measured by quantifying the reversion of rifampinresistance caused by mutation in genome.pBAD_SDA_RBS-mutD- sfGFPcould increase the genome mutation rate up to 10 times compared with negative control with 1g/L induction concentration of L-arabinose.
Figure.1 rifampicin reversion mutants caused by mutD expression and the counts by agar plate
Figure.2 Conception illustration of the working mechanism of mutD
1 Schaaper, R. M. MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS IN THE ESCHERICHIA-COLI MUTATOR MUTD5 - ROLE OF DNA MISMATCH REPAIR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 8126-8130,doi:10.1073/pnas.85.21.8126 (1988).
2 Lou, C. B., Stanton, B., Chen, Y. J., Munsky, B. & Voigt, C. A. Ribozyme-based insulator parts buffer synthetic circuits from genetic context. Nature Biotechnology 30, 1137-+, doi:10.1038/nbt.2401 (2012).
