Team:Manchester/Notebooktest2
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 784: | Line 784: | ||
<li id="two"><a href="" onclick="blocking('text5'); return false;">Week 6</a> | <li id="two"><a href="" onclick="blocking('text5'); return false;">Week 6</a> | ||
<div id="text5"> | <div id="text5"> | ||
- | <p> This has been a | + | <p> This has been a good week of collaborations for us! At the start of the week we had a Google hangout with Perdue to discuss their idea to standardise entry of parts into the registry. It emerged that there are many issues raised when it comes to standardising modelling. We agreed to help them with this. By the end of the week, this had somewhat grown...</p> |
<p>On Thursday we headed off to London for the very first Young Synthetic Biologists (YSB) conference. This was a big meeting of all the UK iGEM teams. On the first day we listened to presentations from each team in the morning. The afternoon featured workshops covering topics such as public engagement, business startups and bioart. </p> | <p>On Thursday we headed off to London for the very first Young Synthetic Biologists (YSB) conference. This was a big meeting of all the UK iGEM teams. On the first day we listened to presentations from each team in the morning. The afternoon featured workshops covering topics such as public engagement, business startups and bioart. </p> | ||
- | <p>The second day brought | + | <p>The second day brought exciting news to the team. After our presentation, we had a lot of interest in our model. This led to a proposed collaboration with several other UK teams. Our aim is to each make a video tutorial on how to use various different software commonly used to model in iGEM, and to then make these videos accessible to future teams. Hopefully having introductions like this will encourage and inspire more people to embrace modelling in their projects!</p> |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
<p> <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/a0/Ysb12.jpg" /></center> </p> | <p> <center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/a0/Ysb12.jpg" /></center> </p> | ||
Line 861: | Line 855: | ||
The work was split into 4 sections: 1. Cloning and inserting ribosomal binding site (RBS) gene into pUC18 vector, 2. Cloning of FabA from WT <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3), 3. FadD knockout, 4. LC-MS characterisation.</p> | The work was split into 4 sections: 1. Cloning and inserting ribosomal binding site (RBS) gene into pUC18 vector, 2. Cloning of FabA from WT <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3), 3. FadD knockout, 4. LC-MS characterisation.</p> | ||
<p>1. RBS BioBricks from the kit were ligated into plasmid, transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH5-alpha (?), and miniprepped. (this is probably wrong. Rob or Tim clarify please)</p> | <p>1. RBS BioBricks from the kit were ligated into plasmid, transformed into <i>E. coli</i> DH5-alpha (?), and miniprepped. (this is probably wrong. Rob or Tim clarify please)</p> | ||
- | <p>2. We really want to BioBrick FabA because it is an important part of the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway of <i>E. coli</i> that is yet to be submitted to the Registry, and also we | + | <p>2. We really want to BioBrick FabA because it is an important part of the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway of <i>E. coli</i> that is yet to be submitted to the Registry, and also we would really like to attempt to measure the kinetic properties of the enzyme to improve our model. This week we cloned the gene from <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) using PCR and stored in the freezer. The team are now thinking on the best ways to characterise this gene.</p> |
<p>3. Sadly, this week we had to say goodbye to our hopes of achieving knockout of the FadD gene. 10 long weeks and nothing to show for it (other than a significant improvement in our PCR and gel electrophoresis skills)! </p> | <p>3. Sadly, this week we had to say goodbye to our hopes of achieving knockout of the FadD gene. 10 long weeks and nothing to show for it (other than a significant improvement in our PCR and gel electrophoresis skills)! </p> | ||
<p>4. We met with Nik who guided us through the quenching and metabolite extraction of prokaryotic cells. Initially we are running reference samples through Orbitrap LC-MS (WT <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) cells in different media, solid and liquid fractions of authentic palm oil), which we will then compare to the fatty acid profiles of our constructs. Nik also kept us entertained with stories about how the Orbitrap technology was developed in a cellar here in Manchester, and showed us a signed mass spectrometer by Alexander Makarov himself!</p> | <p>4. We met with Nik who guided us through the quenching and metabolite extraction of prokaryotic cells. Initially we are running reference samples through Orbitrap LC-MS (WT <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) cells in different media, solid and liquid fractions of authentic palm oil), which we will then compare to the fatty acid profiles of our constructs. Nik also kept us entertained with stories about how the Orbitrap technology was developed in a cellar here in Manchester, and showed us a signed mass spectrometer by Alexander Makarov himself!</p> |
Revision as of 11:19, 27 September 2013