Team:EPF Lausanne/Next steps

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Nanoparticles)
(Sensing/Effector)
Line 22: Line 22:
==Sensing/Effector==
==Sensing/Effector==
-
•<br>
+
Make more plate reader experiments, with more different pHs and differnt Buffers<br>
-
•<br>
+
Transform other E.coli K12 (MG1655), because the promoter originate from this strain, so maybe the needed xxxy aren't present in the DHalpha strain we use at the moment <br>
-
•<br>
+
Start new cloning, with slight variations of the sequence <br>
==Taxi.Coli==
==Taxi.Coli==

Revision as of 17:36, 4 October 2013

Taxi.Coli: Smart Drug Delivery iGEM EPFL

Header

Up until now we succeded
• Producing Nanoparticles and loading them
• Clone a pH sensitive promoter
• Engineer a fusion protein between ice nucleation protein and streptavidin

But we didn't have enough time to characterize completely and assemble the parts to form the Taxi.Coli.

Contents

What we would have done with more time:

Nanoparticles

• Digestion assay first with commercial MMP2/trypsin then with


Cell surface display of Streptavidin

• Cloned a plasmid that encodes a fusion protein INP-Streptavidin-YFP and one INP-YFP-Streptavidin. Then we would have been able to use the exact same protocol we used to characterize the Biobrick BBa_K523013, to proof surface localization.
• Cloned a plasmid that encodes a fusion protein of INP with for example protein A to check if the

Sensing/Effector

• Make more plate reader experiments, with more different pHs and differnt Buffers
• Transform other E.coli K12 (MG1655), because the promoter originate from this strain, so maybe the needed xxxy aren't present in the DHalpha strain we use at the moment
• Start new cloning, with slight variations of the sequence

Taxi.Coli

• Cloned one of our Biobricks in a backbone that contains another resistance than chloramphenicol to cotransfect bacteria with the Plasmids responsible for Sensing/Effector and the Plasmid used to connect the Nanoparticles.