Team:EPF Lausanne/Calendar/29 July 2013

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:EPFL2013Header}}
{{Template:EPFL2013Header}}
-
 
<font size = "4">Cell Surface Display</font>
<font size = "4">Cell Surface Display</font>
Line 7: Line 6:
The previous PCR we did to amplify ''pINP_construct'' was not optimal. We thus did another gradient PCR of the same plasmid with 5% DMSO at 74°C, 76°C and 78°C.
The previous PCR we did to amplify ''pINP_construct'' was not optimal. We thus did another gradient PCR of the same plasmid with 5% DMSO at 74°C, 76°C and 78°C.
A 0.8% Electrophoresis gel was performed to verify the reation's products.
A 0.8% Electrophoresis gel was performed to verify the reation's products.
-
<BR><BR><BR>
+
<BR><BR>
<font size = "4">Nanoparticles</font>
<font size = "4">Nanoparticles</font>
''Making Nanoparticles, 1st try'' <BR>
''Making Nanoparticles, 1st try'' <BR>
-
We added the cargo molecule (food dye) to GPs and left them for stirring (during 3 days)).  
+
We added the cargo molecule (food dye) to GPs and left them for stirring (during 3 days).  
{{Template:EPFL2013Footer}}
{{Template:EPFL2013Footer}}

Latest revision as of 21:27, 4 October 2013

Taxi.Coli: Smart Drug Delivery iGEM EPFL

Header

Cell Surface Display

PCR optimisation
The previous PCR we did to amplify pINP_construct was not optimal. We thus did another gradient PCR of the same plasmid with 5% DMSO at 74°C, 76°C and 78°C. A 0.8% Electrophoresis gel was performed to verify the reation's products.

Nanoparticles

Making Nanoparticles, 1st try
We added the cargo molecule (food dye) to GPs and left them for stirring (during 3 days).