Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Winterexp/Period3/Dailylog

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Undo revision 9874 by Keltziee (talk))
Line 4: Line 4:
{| width="100%"
{| width="100%"
-
| colspan="3" | <font color="#333399" size="5" font face="Calibri"> '''Large Phage March - April Notebook: April 1 - April 14 Daily Log'''</font>
+
| colspan="3" | <font color="#333399" size="5" font face="Calibri"> '''Small Phage March - April Notebook: April 1 - April 14 Daily Log'''</font>
<br>
<br>
Line 16: Line 16:
: [[Team:BYU_Provo/Small_Phage|Overview]]
: [[Team:BYU_Provo/Small_Phage|Overview]]
-
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/LargePhage/Winterexp|March-April]]
+
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Winterexp|March-April]]
-
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/LargePhage/Springexp|May-June]]
+
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Springexp|May-June]]
-
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/LargePhage/Summerexp|July-August]]
+
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Summerexp|July-August]]
-
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/LargePhage/Fallexp|September-October]]
+
: [[Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Fallexp|September-October]]
</font>
</font>
Line 32: Line 32:
<font size="4"> '''4/1/13''' </font>
<font size="4"> '''4/1/13''' </font>
-
4/1/13 KS &BDM
+
- Presentation day!
-
Today we did presentations. I talked about DNA packaging in phage. Right now we’re waiting for our phage to come in so we can do some mutagenesis!
+
: [[Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Winterexp/Period1/PR| Presentation]]
-
INSERT PRESENTATION HERE MAYBE?
+
<br>
 +
 
<font size="4"> '''4/3/13''' </font>
<font size="4"> '''4/3/13''' </font>
-
4/3/13 KS & BDM
 
-
Final Project notes:
+
- Learned about how to start an overnight liquid culture for host bacteria
-
1. Watch a science talk and write a paragraph about the presentation. Write a one paragraph critique.
+
-
T/TH 11:00 and 4:00
+
-
2. Give a presentation on our project so far (15 minutes)
+
-
5-10 minutes on the Background
+
-
-Hypothesis, what is our question, why are we researching this
+
-
5-10 minutes methods and results
+
-
Conclusion- Short, clear bulleted
+
-
Things we need:
+
- Learned about how to create bacterial glycerol stock
-
H-Broth
+
-
adenine (20ug/ml)
+
-
e.coli B bacteria
+
-
m9+ medium
+
-
uricil
+
-
200ug 5-bromodeoxyuridine, 20ug uridine, 20ug adenine per ml
+
-
*all work was done in yellow light?
+
-
chloroform
+
-
calcium chloride
+
-
magnesium chloride
+
-
To do: grow up T1 and T4
+
- Made fresh LB and concentrated top agar stock
 +
: [[Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Winterexp/Period1/Exp/4.3 Top Agar Stock Preparation|4.3 Top Agar Stock Preparation]]
 +
<br>
 +
 +
<font size="4"> '''4/4/13''' </font>
 +
 +
- T7 arrived
 +
 +
- Overnight liquid culture for bacterial host started by Dr. Grose
<br>
<br>
Line 66: Line 57:
<font size="4"> '''4/5/13''' </font>
<font size="4"> '''4/5/13''' </font>
-
4/5/13-KS and BDM
+
- Background research on phiX174: the only phage we have in stock
-
Today we did a spot test with 11T4, T4Do(s), 12T4r, 40T4r, 40T4 with e.coli BL21.
+
 
-
Procedure:
+
- Performed [[Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Winterexp/Period1/Exp/3.20 Phage Viability Test|3.20 Phage Viability Test]]
-
We plated .5 mL of an overnight culture of E. coli BL21 in 4.5 mL of LB 1x top agar.  When it had hardened, we spot tested 5 uL of the following samples on the plates: 11T4, T4Do(s), 12T4r, 40T4r, 40T4 into 6 sectors of a plate.  T4Do came from Dr. Casjens at the University of Utah. We incubated these plates at 37 degrees Celsius.
+
-
We plated a control of just bacteria.
+
-
Also, we infected .5 mL of BL21 with 1 uL of the T4Do sample for 20 mins, and then plated it.
+
-
We started two liquid cultures, each containing 1 mL of BL21.  One received 1 uL of T4Do, the other received 10 uL. These were incubated on a shaker at 37C.
+
<br>
<br>
-
<font size="4"> '''4/8/13''' </font>
+
<font size="4"> '''3/21/13''' </font>
 +
 
 +
- Checked up on results for [[Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Winterexp/Period1/Exp/3.20 Phage Viability Test|3.20 Phage Viability Test]]
-
[[File:Example1.jpg|400px]]
 
-
We performed a phage titer spot test on two bacteria.  We used the BL21 and W3110 strains of E. coli.  We first put 100 microL of broth into epindorf tubes.  We then took 10 microL of 1L, 10L, 40T4, T4DOS, and T4 infected phage and placed it in separate tubes labeled -1.  We performed a dilution series taking out 10 microL each time.  The last tube we did not remove 10 microL so the total volume was 110 microL.  Next we added 4.5 mL of 1x top agar to .5mL of bacteria for both strains and plated it on LB plates.  We had previously divided the plates into six sections with the labels 0, -1, -2, -3, -4, and -5.  We took the phage from each concentration and spotted it on the plates.  We allowed the plates to sit and let the phage soak in.  We then placed the plates in the 37 C overnight.
 
<br>
<br>
-
<font size="4"> '''4/10/13''' </font>
+
<font size="4"> '''3/22/13''' </font>
-
Results (Wed. 4/10/13)
+
-
We saw phage plaques in all spots (10^0 through 10^-5) on all bacteria for 10L (10uL of T4Do stock in 1 mL of bacteria grown over the weekend), 1L (1uL same as above), T4Do (stock), and T4 infected plate flood.  40T4 from the fridge grew on BL21 but not W3110.
+
-
I had started two liquid cultures of 100uL of liquid from the plate flood in 1mL of W3110 and BL21.  The W3110 bacteria was visibly lysed (clear); the BL21 bacteria had some snot but was not lysed.
+
-
Procedure
+
- Discussed results from tittering experiment (preliminary experiment 1)
-
We pelleted the liquid from the two liquid cultures and did a 10^0 through 10^-5 dilution on each, along with a bacterial lawn control.
+
 
-
We also started two more liquid cultures of 1 mL from the plate flood in 10 mL of W3110. We will shake these in a 100 mL flask at 37C.
+
: Contamination mostly likely resulted from the step involving suspending phage in LB – obvious contamination in the LB bottle
-
[[File:Example2.jpg|400px]]
+
 
-
[[File:Example3.jpg|400px]]
+
: One of the stock phage solution had contamination as well
-
[[File:Example4.jpg|400px]]
+
 
 +
- Discussed step of attack with Dr. Grose
 +
 
 +
: Decided to go with T7, if necessary Qbeta
 +
 
 +
: Need to learn to make top agar at various concentrations
 +
 
 +
: Need to do more background research and decide whether to assemble phage capsid in vitro (plasmid + E coli) or do direct mutagenesis of phage genome
 +
 
 +
:: Need to correspond with the isolation team
 +
 
 +
- Sequencing will be for individual genes to cut down cost
 +
 
 +
: Need to design primers and get to know the genome of the phage
 +
 
 +
- Learnt about Mega5 to compare genome and protein sequence
<br>
<br>
-
<font size="4"> '''4/12/13''' </font>
+
<font size="4"> '''3/25/13''' </font>
 +
- Reported on past week and plans for this week
 +
: From last week: titering experiment
 +
: This week
 +
:: Learn to make top agar at various concentrations
 +
:: Background research to determine in vitro assembly vs altering genome – look into specific techniques
 +
:: Comparing genome of phage and decide on possible site-directed mutagenesis options
 +
- Start working on designing our site directed mutagenesis
 +
: Qbeta vs MS2
 +
:: Look for places where sequences are significantly different
 +
:: Might be worthwhile to look at capsid structure to identify the regions where interactions between subunits take place
 +
 +
: Qbeta vs T7 major
 +
:: No real consensus – more worthwhile to compare capsid protein sequence of T7 with those that have similar size to it
 +
 +
: T7 major vs minor
 +
:: Minor is longer, but not necessary – the tail overhang is due to ribosome moving two codons downstream instead of three
 +
:: Suggest we can direct mutation to the poly-U site and prevent ribosome slippage
 +
 +
: Qbeta major vs minor
 +
:: Just continue transcribing after it reaches the stop codon. What does the stop codon code for?
 +
 +
- Research into in-vitro assembly vs direct mutation of phage genome
 +
: It seems that we’ll need to clone the genome of the phage into a plasmid and let it assemble in an E coli
 +
: Using chemicals we can induce random mutations in phage – might be worthwhile if selection in agar is not working as well.
<br>
<br>
 +
<font size="4"> '''3/27/13''' </font>
 +
 +
- More research on genome of enterobacteria phage
 +
 +
: Generation of the major and minor capsid in Q beta
 +
: Capsid protein information research
 +
: Capsid protein sequence comparison
 +
 +
- Outlined protocol for producing stock top agar
 +
: [[Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Winterexp/Period1/Exp/4.3 Top Agar Stock Preparation|4.3 Top Agar Stock Preparation]]
 +
 +
<br>
 +
 +
<font size="4"> '''3/29/13''' </font>
 +
 +
- Worked on our first team presentation.
 +
 +
<br>
</font>
</font>

Revision as of 21:43, 3 June 2013


Small Phage March - April Notebook: April 1 - April 14 Daily Log



Overview
March-April
May-June
July-August
September-October

4/1/13

- Presentation day!

Presentation


4/3/13

- Learned about how to start an overnight liquid culture for host bacteria

- Learned about how to create bacterial glycerol stock

- Made fresh LB and concentrated top agar stock

4.3 Top Agar Stock Preparation


4/4/13

- T7 arrived

- Overnight liquid culture for bacterial host started by Dr. Grose


4/5/13

- Background research on phiX174: the only phage we have in stock

- Performed 3.20 Phage Viability Test


3/21/13

- Checked up on results for 3.20 Phage Viability Test


3/22/13

- Discussed results from tittering experiment (preliminary experiment 1)

Contamination mostly likely resulted from the step involving suspending phage in LB – obvious contamination in the LB bottle
One of the stock phage solution had contamination as well

- Discussed step of attack with Dr. Grose

Decided to go with T7, if necessary Qbeta
Need to learn to make top agar at various concentrations
Need to do more background research and decide whether to assemble phage capsid in vitro (plasmid + E coli) or do direct mutagenesis of phage genome
Need to correspond with the isolation team

- Sequencing will be for individual genes to cut down cost

Need to design primers and get to know the genome of the phage

- Learnt about Mega5 to compare genome and protein sequence


3/25/13

- Reported on past week and plans for this week

From last week: titering experiment
This week
Learn to make top agar at various concentrations
Background research to determine in vitro assembly vs altering genome – look into specific techniques
Comparing genome of phage and decide on possible site-directed mutagenesis options

- Start working on designing our site directed mutagenesis

Qbeta vs MS2
Look for places where sequences are significantly different
Might be worthwhile to look at capsid structure to identify the regions where interactions between subunits take place
Qbeta vs T7 major
No real consensus – more worthwhile to compare capsid protein sequence of T7 with those that have similar size to it
T7 major vs minor
Minor is longer, but not necessary – the tail overhang is due to ribosome moving two codons downstream instead of three
Suggest we can direct mutation to the poly-U site and prevent ribosome slippage
Qbeta major vs minor
Just continue transcribing after it reaches the stop codon. What does the stop codon code for?

- Research into in-vitro assembly vs direct mutation of phage genome

It seems that we’ll need to clone the genome of the phage into a plasmid and let it assemble in an E coli
Using chemicals we can induce random mutations in phage – might be worthwhile if selection in agar is not working as well.


3/27/13

- More research on genome of enterobacteria phage

Generation of the major and minor capsid in Q beta
Capsid protein information research
Capsid protein sequence comparison

- Outlined protocol for producing stock top agar

4.3 Top Agar Stock Preparation


3/29/13

- Worked on our first team presentation.