Team:Buenos Aires/ resqrfp

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(mRFP production over time)
 
(42 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="external">
<div id="external">
-
=mRFP under Arsenic Inducible Promoter ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1106003 Bba_K1106003]) characterization=
+
=mRFP under Arsenite Inducible Promoter ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1106003 Bba_K1106003]) characterization=
 +
 
 +
'''Objective'''
 +
 
 +
Asess mRFP production, stability and naked eye discernibility range under inducible conditions.
 +
 
 +
'''General procedure'''
 +
 
 +
Different assays were performed using ''E. coli'' (DH5α strain) harbouring a plasmid that encodes mRFP under arsenite inducible promoter (ArsRFP culture).
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
== '''mRFP production at different arsenite concentrations''' ==
 +
 
 +
'''Method'''
 +
 
 +
ArsRFP cultures were grown with different arsenite concentrations ( 0, 25, 50, 100, 500 and 1000ppb). 1ml aliquots were taken after 24 hours and fluorescence was measured.
 +
 
 +
'''Results'''
 +
 
 +
mRFP fluorescence increases with higher arsenite concentrations, in a sigmoidal way.
 +
 
 +
[[File:Exp_Ine.jpg|center|600px|]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<html>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
</html>
 +
 
 +
==Measurement of groundwater samples with pars_mRFP==
 +
 
 +
Using the experiment above as a calibration curve, we calculated the concentration of arsenite in groundwater samples. To achieve that, we first had to linearize the curve. As the curve seems to fit a logarithmic function, we aplied a logarithmic transformation to the original data, setting 1,6 as the base and the value of fluorescence at 608 nm/OD as the exponent. This way, we got a good linear fit, and used the function obtained to estimate arsenite concentration from values of fluorescence at 608 nm/OD.
 +
 
 +
[[File:Ajuste_lineal_RFP.png|center|600px|]]
 +
 
 +
We then compared our method to an commonly used method for arsenic detection (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, AAS). the results show that, despite pArs_mRFP construct is not as precise as AAS, it can be used as a method to indicate the arsenic concentration at different ranges (and that is what we actually need!).
 +
 
 +
[[File:Correlacion_arsenico.png|center|600px|]]
 +
 
 +
<html>
 +
<div id="inwiki">
 +
</html>
 +
For more information about the sample locations and their arsenic concentrations, please visit our [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Buenos_Aires/_mapaarsenico Human Practice section ]
 +
 
 +
<html>
 +
</div>
 +
</html>
== '''mRFP production over time''' ==
== '''mRFP production over time''' ==
 +
-
'''Protocol'''
+
'''Method'''
-
First of all in the characterization of this part, mRFP fluorescence production was measured over time. To accomplish that, a 100 ml culture of EColi DH5alfa carrying a plasmid with a mRFP generator under arsenite sensitive promoter  was grown at 30°C until they reach OD=0.4 (600nm). At this point arsenite was added (1000ppb of arsenite final concentration) and fluorescence was measured every 30 minutes for 8 hours with a fluorimeter at 584 nm excitation peak and 607 nm emission peak. All these data was normalized by the culture density measured by OD.
+
A 100 ml ArsRFP culture was grown at 30°C until it reached OD=0.4 (OD 600nm). At this point arsenite was added (1000ppb final concentration) and fluorescence was measured every 30 minutes during 8 hours at 584 nm excitation peak and 608 nm emission peak.  
'''Results'''
'''Results'''
 +
 +
As shown in the figure below, mRFP production increses over time with arsenite (1000 ppb). However, there is a 3 hours lag after inoculation.
[[File:RFP_induccion.jpg|center|600px|]]
[[File:RFP_induccion.jpg|center|600px|]]
-
As it is shown in the figure below, in the presence of arsenite (1000 ppb) a typical transcriptional induction is observed over time.
+
<html>
-
There is a lag of 3 hours in the mRFP produciton after adding arsenite.
+
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
</html>
== '''mRFP stability over time''' ==
== '''mRFP stability over time''' ==
-
'''Protocol'''
+
'''Method'''
-
E. coli carrying a plasmid that encodes mRFP under an arsenite inducible promoter was grown overnight in 10 ml. LB medium with arsenic (2000 ppb).
+
ArsRFP culture was grown overnight at 37ºC in 10 ml LB medium with 2000ppb arsenite concentration. The following day, the culture was centrifuged and the supernatant was discarded in order to remove the arsenite, thus stopping the induction. Afterwars, fresh LB medium was added and the pellet was resuspended. This was done twice and the culture was returned to 37ºC incubation. 1 ml of this culture was taken every 12 hours for the following 4 days. Finally, fluorescence was measured.  
-
The following day, the culture was centrifuged and the supernatant was discarded in order to remove the arsenic, stopping the induction. After that, new medium was added and the pellet was resuspended. This was done twice.
+
-
1 ml of this culture was removed and centrifuged after every 12 hours for the following 4 days.
+
-
At the end, it was measure the fluorescence of the samples and normalized by the OD (600 nm).  
+
'''Results'''
'''Results'''
 +
mRFP degradation is shown over time, specially during the first 24 hours.
 +
[[File:RFP_santi.jpg|center|600px]]
-
== '''Naked eye discernibility range of mRFP production by arsenite inducible promoter''' ==
 
-
'''Protocol'''
+
<html>
 +
<br>
 +
<br>
 +
</html>
-
The objective of this assay is to figure out whether bacteria that get colored in the presence of arsenic, reach saturation over time when induced with different arsenite concentrations and if the colour intensity is distinguishable between each other at naked eye.
+
== '''Naked eye discernibility range of mRFP production by arsenite inducible promoter''' ==
-
To achieve this, E. Coli DH5alfa Bacteria harbouring a plasmid that encodes mRFP generator under arsenite promoter, were grown with different arsenite concentration ( 0, 10, 50, 200 and 1000ppb). 1ml aliquots were taken every 12 hours and were centrifuged at 10.000rpm for 5 minutes. Pictures of the pellets were taken in order to compare colour difference at naked eye. mRFP fluorescence was also measured with a fluorimeter at X nm for excitation and X nm for emission.
+
-
'''Results'''
+
'''Method'''
-
As it can be seen in the pictures below, the colour production can be clearly distinguish between different arsenic concentrations after 24 hours of induction and between the higher arsenite concentrations only. It can also be noticed that over time the production grows and that after xxxtime the difference between 200 and 1000ppb is not clear.  
+
ArsRFP cultures were grown with different arsenite concentrations ( 0, 10, 50, 200 and 1000ppb). 1ml aliquots were taken every 12 hours and centrifuged at 10.000rpm for 5 minutes. Pellets pictures were taken in order to compare the range of colour at naked eye. mRFP fluorescence was also measured with a fluorimeter at 484nm for excitation and 608 nm for emission.
-
So, in order to accelerate the develop of colour and its quantity at lower arsenite concentrations but avoiding saturation in all the samples to keep the difference observable at naked eye. We concluded that a signal amplification system has to be added but also with some switch to stop the production.
+
'''Results'''
-
 
+
-
After 12 hours of induction:
+
-
[[File:T1.JPG | center | 400px]]
+
-
After 24 hours of induction:
+
As it can be seen in the pictures below, a difference in the colour production can be clearly distinguished between different arsenite concentrations after 24 hours of induction and between the higher arsenite concentrations only. It can also be observed that over time the production grows and that after 62 hours the difference between 200 and 1000ppb is not clear.  
-
[[File:T2.JPG | center | 400px]]
+
-
After 36 hours of induction:
 
-
[[File:T3.JPG | center | 400px]]
 
-
After 48 hours of induction:
+
{| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#fff;margin:auto;"
-
[[File:T4'.JPG | center | 400px]]
+
|+Induction over time at different concentrations of arsenite (ppb)
 +
|-
 +
|After 12 hours of induction:
 +
[[File:T1rfp.jpg | center | 400px]]
 +
|-
 +
|After 24 hours of induction:
 +
[[File:T2rfp2.jpg| center | 400px]]
 +
|-
 +
|After 36 hours of induction:
 +
[[File:T3rfp.jpg | center | 400px]]
 +
|-
 +
|After 48 hours of induction:
 +
[[File:T4'rfp.jpg | center | 400px]]
 +
|-
 +
|After 50 hours of induction:
 +
[[File:T5rfp.jpg | center | 400px]]
 +
|-
 +
|After 62 hours of induction:
 +
[[File:T6rfp.jpg| center | 400px]]
 +
|}
-
After 50 hours of induction:
 
-
[[File:T5.JPG | center | 400px]]
 
-
After 62 hours of induction:
+
== '''Collaboration with iGEM Tec-Monterrey team''' ==
-
[[File:T6.JPG | center | 400px]]
+
 +
We established a collaboration with the iGEM Tec-Monterrey team, and exchanged constructions to characterize. In this link you may find their characterization of our mRFP under pArs: [[https://2013.igem.org/Team:TecMonterrey/collab_argentina.html Tec-Monterrey characterization]].
 +
== '''Overall conclusions''' ==
 +
mRFP production responds efficiently under inducible conditions, both over time and different arsenite concentrations. The mRFP stability is acceptable for the aim of our Project. However, the visibility to the naked eye is not sufficient at low arsenite concentrations.
 +
We reached to the conclusion that, in order to increase the colour production at lower arsenite concentrations, a signal amplification system has to be added. It could also be added some switch to stop the production and avoid saturation of all the samples, and thus keep the range of colour observable to the naked eye.
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 14:24, 28 October 2013

Contents

mRFP under Arsenite Inducible Promoter ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1106003 Bba_K1106003]) characterization

Objective

Asess mRFP production, stability and naked eye discernibility range under inducible conditions.

General procedure

Different assays were performed using E. coli (DH5α strain) harbouring a plasmid that encodes mRFP under arsenite inducible promoter (ArsRFP culture).


mRFP production at different arsenite concentrations

Method

ArsRFP cultures were grown with different arsenite concentrations ( 0, 25, 50, 100, 500 and 1000ppb). 1ml aliquots were taken after 24 hours and fluorescence was measured.

Results

mRFP fluorescence increases with higher arsenite concentrations, in a sigmoidal way.

Exp Ine.jpg




Measurement of groundwater samples with pars_mRFP

Using the experiment above as a calibration curve, we calculated the concentration of arsenite in groundwater samples. To achieve that, we first had to linearize the curve. As the curve seems to fit a logarithmic function, we aplied a logarithmic transformation to the original data, setting 1,6 as the base and the value of fluorescence at 608 nm/OD as the exponent. This way, we got a good linear fit, and used the function obtained to estimate arsenite concentration from values of fluorescence at 608 nm/OD.

Ajuste lineal RFP.png

We then compared our method to an commonly used method for arsenic detection (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, AAS). the results show that, despite pArs_mRFP construct is not as precise as AAS, it can be used as a method to indicate the arsenic concentration at different ranges (and that is what we actually need!).

Correlacion arsenico.png

For more information about the sample locations and their arsenic concentrations, please visit our Human Practice section

mRFP production over time

Method

A 100 ml ArsRFP culture was grown at 30°C until it reached OD=0.4 (OD 600nm). At this point arsenite was added (1000ppb final concentration) and fluorescence was measured every 30 minutes during 8 hours at 584 nm excitation peak and 608 nm emission peak.

Results

As shown in the figure below, mRFP production increses over time with arsenite (1000 ppb). However, there is a 3 hours lag after inoculation.

RFP induccion.jpg



mRFP stability over time

Method

ArsRFP culture was grown overnight at 37ºC in 10 ml LB medium with 2000ppb arsenite concentration. The following day, the culture was centrifuged and the supernatant was discarded in order to remove the arsenite, thus stopping the induction. Afterwars, fresh LB medium was added and the pellet was resuspended. This was done twice and the culture was returned to 37ºC incubation. 1 ml of this culture was taken every 12 hours for the following 4 days. Finally, fluorescence was measured.

Results

mRFP degradation is shown over time, specially during the first 24 hours.

RFP santi.jpg




Naked eye discernibility range of mRFP production by arsenite inducible promoter

Method

ArsRFP cultures were grown with different arsenite concentrations ( 0, 10, 50, 200 and 1000ppb). 1ml aliquots were taken every 12 hours and centrifuged at 10.000rpm for 5 minutes. Pellets pictures were taken in order to compare the range of colour at naked eye. mRFP fluorescence was also measured with a fluorimeter at 484nm for excitation and 608 nm for emission.

Results

As it can be seen in the pictures below, a difference in the colour production can be clearly distinguished between different arsenite concentrations after 24 hours of induction and between the higher arsenite concentrations only. It can also be observed that over time the production grows and that after 62 hours the difference between 200 and 1000ppb is not clear.


Induction over time at different concentrations of arsenite (ppb)
After 12 hours of induction:
T1rfp.jpg
After 24 hours of induction:
T2rfp2.jpg
After 36 hours of induction:
T3rfp.jpg
After 48 hours of induction:
T4'rfp.jpg
After 50 hours of induction:
T5rfp.jpg
After 62 hours of induction:
T6rfp.jpg


Collaboration with iGEM Tec-Monterrey team

We established a collaboration with the iGEM Tec-Monterrey team, and exchanged constructions to characterize. In this link you may find their characterization of our mRFP under pArs: [Tec-Monterrey characterization].

Overall conclusions

mRFP production responds efficiently under inducible conditions, both over time and different arsenite concentrations. The mRFP stability is acceptable for the aim of our Project. However, the visibility to the naked eye is not sufficient at low arsenite concentrations. We reached to the conclusion that, in order to increase the colour production at lower arsenite concentrations, a signal amplification system has to be added. It could also be added some switch to stop the production and avoid saturation of all the samples, and thus keep the range of colour observable to the naked eye.