Team:Exeter/Project

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Overall project)
(Reverting bootstrap theme)
 
(79 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
<!-- *** What falls between these lines is the Alert Box!  You can remove it from your pages once you have read and understood the alert *** -->
+
<!--- Navigation box --->
-
 
+
{| style="color:#2F2F4F;background-color:#B9D3EE;" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" align="center"
-
<html>
+
-
<div id="box" style="width: 700px; margin-left: 137px; padding: 5px; border: 3px solid #000; background-color: #fe2b33;">
+
-
<div id="template" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: large; color: #f6f6f6; padding: 5px;">
+
-
This is a template page. READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS.
+
-
</div>
+
-
<div id="instructions" style="text-align: center; font-weight: normal; font-size: small; color: #f6f6f6; padding: 5px;">
+
-
You are provided with this team page template with which to start the iGEM season.  You may choose to personalize it to fit your team but keep the same "look." Or you may choose to take your team wiki to a different level and design your own wiki.  You can find some examples <a href="https://2008.igem.org/Help:Template/Examples">HERE</a>.
+
-
</div>
+
-
<div id="warning" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: small; color: #f6f6f6; padding: 5px;">
+
-
You <strong>MUST</strong> have all of the pages listed in the menu below with the names specified.  PLEASE keep all of your pages within your teams namespace. 
+
-
</div>
+
-
</div>
+
-
</html>
+
-
 
+
-
<!-- *** End of the alert box *** -->
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
{| style="color:#1b2c8a;background-color:#0c6;" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" border="1" bordercolor="#fff" width="62%" align="center"
+
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter|Home]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter|Home]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Team|Team]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Team|Team]]
!align="center"|[https://igem.org/Team.cgi?year=2013&team_name=Exeter Official Team Profile]
!align="center"|[https://igem.org/Team.cgi?year=2013&team_name=Exeter Official Team Profile]
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Project|Project]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Project|Project]]
-
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Parts|Parts Submitted to the Registry]]
+
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Parts|Part Submissions]]
-
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Modeling|Modeling]]
+
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Modelling|Modelling]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Notebook|Notebook]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Notebook|Notebook]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Safety|Safety]]
!align="center"|[[Team:Exeter/Safety|Safety]]
Line 30: Line 12:
|}
|}
 +
== Project Description ==
 +
Our project aims to produce a group of BioBricks organised into three modules; one each for Red, Green and Blue ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_color RGB]) light. To demonstrate the system we will control the production of Cyan, Magenta and Yellow pigments, but we will also be inputting a system where future teams could have any gene as their "output" gene. We are using the CMY pigments, but you could potentially use the RGB light to control the transcription of anything.
 +
The ultimate aim of our project is to use ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtractive_color CMY]) pigments to produce the world's first colour bio-photograph or
 +
[http://parts.igem.org/Coliroid coliroid].
-
== '''Overall project''' ==
+
We will be building upon the work done by previous iGEM teams, most notably Texas/Austin 2004, Edinburgh 2010 and Uppsala 2011.
-
Our overarching aim is to further improve upon an area that many past iGEM teams have studied; using multi-wavelength light stimulus to generate variable outputs. We are especially inspired by Uppsala’s 2011 project, and the “Hello World” bio-film from UT Austin in 2004. Additionally we aim to produce a standardized brick to be twinned through a series of NOT gates with the available well characterized light input machinery, enabling implementation of any trio of outputs. Acute control over each output should be possible by varying wavelength input. To show this off we hope to use CMY colour wheel as our output (as opposed to the previously studied RBY), to produce a bio-photograph. We also hope to use non-fluorescing proteins as our pigments, as we want a picture that simply develops, visualisable without any further stimulation/excitation.
+
If you would like to see any of our initial brainstorming - please feel free to follow this link ([https://2013.igem.org/Team:Exeter/Brainstorming Brainstorming])
-
Although this has been a subject many teams have grappled with in the past (with differing degrees of success), we are confident that we can add to the mass of data and introduce new BioBricks related to light-sensing and output in the iGEM database, and hopefully go several steps further towards making full-colour photographs using bacteria.
+
== The Camera ==
-
Considering modelling, we hope to analyse the absorption spectrum of each pigment, both alone and in combination. Visualisation of light sensitivity throughout the system will enable calibration of the light input ensuring a reliable and sensical output. Further to this other teams reported their light sensing systems working better at temperatures <37 degrees, which we will also investigate.
+
Bio-Photography is the application of genetically engineered bacteria to act as the light sensor of a camera, replacing digital sensors ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_sensor#Sensors_used_in_digital_cameras CCD/CMOS]) or photographic film. The surface area of bacteria is on the order of microns, much smaller than a digital sensor, giving bio-cameras the potential to produce images with far greater resolution than current digital photography offers.  
-
As a sideline, we’re also going to test a new way of preserving and presenting bacterial culture using pouring plastics. Unfortunately, this would kill the bacteria, but should give academics a new way to physically present colonies and cultures they have been working on. For us, it will allow a way of easily transporting our “photographs” without unwieldy plates and gels.
+
We aim to produce the world's first colour bio-photograph by producing Cyan, Magenta and Yellow pigments in response to Red, Green and Blue light. We plan to combine this system with a lens to focus the image onto plated bacteria to form the world's first colour bio-camera.
-
As mentioned we will be using additive and subtractive colour combinations to allow synthesis of the correct pigment output, corresponding to which colours of light they are exposed to. For example the NOT gated input of red light represses synthesis of cyan pigment enabling an output of yellow and magenta pigment.
+
=== Colour system ===
-
Ensuring reliable activity across NOT gates in our pathways is key in our project. For the blue and red light sensors, the presence of their corresponding wavelength of light causes autophosphorylation of an intermediate protein. Phosphorylated intermediates then freely bind as repressors to the corresponding output gene (cyan for red light, yellow for blue light). With the green light sensor, a signal inverter will be introduced, as the FixJ system acts as an activator not a repressor (the exact opposite of what we want). Instead of acting on the gene coding for the output (magenta) the phosphorylated intermediate binds instead to a gene coding for the cI protein used in the lambda phage (a bacteriophage which infects E. coli). Once synthesised the cl protein acts as the output (magenta) repressor.
+
To produce the full colour spectrum requires all three [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_color primary colours]. This is because any colour can be produced by mixing the primary colours but primary colours cannot be produced by mixing any colours.
-
== Project Details==
+
In our system we are using two sets of primary colours. Red, Green and Blue for light and Cyan, Magenta and Yellow for pigments. This is because light and pigment mix differently; light is additive and pigment is subtractive:
 +
[[Image:Colour_wheels.png‎|center||500px|Image: 500 pixels]]
 +
Light and pigment produce colour in different ways. While coloured light has a peak wavelength corresponding to its colour, coloured pigment absorbs all wavelengths that do not correspond to its colour and so reflect the corresponding coloured light:
 +
<!-- Diagram needed -->
-
=== Part 2 ===
+
In this system, red light is the opposite of cyan pigment, green light is the opposite of magenta pigment, and blue light is the opposite of yellow pigment. Hence our choice of sensors and pigments.
 +
 
 +
It must be noted that while [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RGB_color_model RGB] light give a full spectrum of colour and tone, CMY is a simplified version of the CYMK colour system used in printing. This was done because to engineer the pathways for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMYK_color_model CYMK] colour system outputs is too complex (see logic gates below). However, as CMY is subtractive there will be tone as Cyan + Magenta + Yellow will approximate black.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Better_Logic_gates_including_black.png‎|center||500px|Image: 500 pixels]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
This shows the logic gates required if we included a black pigment (K). Not very simple, and near impossible to input into an <i>E. coli</i>! However, when the black pigment is removed, the logic gates simplify down very neatly...
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Better_Logic_gates_not_including_black.png‎|center||400px|Image: 400 pixels]]
 +
 
 +
This system shows red light suppressing the production of our cyan pigment, green light suppressing the magenta pigment and blue light supressing the yellow pigment.
 +
 
 +
== The Biology ==
 +
 
 +
The focus of our wet work is the creation of three independent 'light to output' pathways in E. coli. Each pathway will control the transcription of selected genes using Red, Green or Blue light. Incident light will prevent the transcription of the selected gene.
 +
 
 +
In our bio-camera the controlled genes will be those that code for the production of cyan, magenta and yellow pigments:
 +
 
 +
* Red light prevents the production of Cyan pigment
 +
* Green light prevents the production of Magenta pigment   
 +
* Blue light prevents the production of Yellow pigment
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Light_to_Pigment_Repression.png|center|‎|300px|Image: 300 pixels]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Each sensor prevents the production of its opposing pigment, producing the pigment which is the same colour of light that the light sensor detects. The mix of pigments will reproduce the colour of light incident on the bacteria.
 +
 
 +
If you'd like to have a go at mixing pigments and lights for yourself, why not play the colour mixing game at the bottom of our Notebook page? More difficult than you'd think!
 +
 
 +
=== Red light pathway ===
 +
 
 +
This pathway uses the well characterised Cph8 red light sensor (composing of Cph1 and Envz). When there is no red light present, this protein causes the phosphorylation of OmpR, to OmpR-P. This then diffuses away from the red light sensor, and can bind to a specialised OmpF promoter sequence which is upstream of the HO-pcyA gene which codes for cyan pigment and stop codon. This is then transcribed and cyan pigment is produced.
 +
 
 +
When Cph8 is exposed to red light, the phosphorylation of OmpR ceases. The OmpR is not capable of diffusing away from the red light sensor, so does not bind to the OmpF promoter before the cyan pigment gene. This means that the cyan pigment can not be generated.  Cyan pigment in this system will be repressed, whereas magenta and yellow pigments will still be produced, which when mixed create a red pigment.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Red_Pathway.png|center|‎|600px|Image: 600 pixels]]
 +
 
 +
=== Green light pathway ===
 +
 
 +
The green light module works differently to the red and blue light modules but it still uses a light sensor (CcaS), intermediate protein (CcaR) and a specialised promoter. However, when the system is exposed to green light, CcaR is phosphorylated and CcaR-P is generated, allowing the synthesis of the magenta pigment to be up regulated instead of prevented. To make an overall green colour, we only want the yellow and cyan pigments to be transcribed, so production of the magenta pigment is problematic.
 +
 
 +
To overcome this issue, we will introduce an inverter system. CcaR-P will be produced when the bacteria are exposed to green light, but instead of binding to a promoter placed before the gene coding for magenta pigment, it will bind to a cI repressor system.  The subsequent transcription of the cI repressor protein will prevent the synthesis of the magenta pigment, as it will bind to a cI promoter. Binding of cI to this promoter ceases transcription of any following genes, therefore magenta will not be produced.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Green_Pathway.png‎|center||600px|Image: 600 pixels]]
 +
 
 +
=== Blue light pathway ===
 +
 
 +
The YtvA/FixL blue light sensor phosphorylates FixJ to FixJ-p in the absence of blue light.  FixJ-p then binds to the promoter for the yellow pigment gene and stop codon.  In the absence of blue light the Yellow pigment is produced.
 +
 
 +
The blue light module works in much the same way as the red light module; absence of blue light allows the phosphorylation of an intermediate protein (FixJ) by the blue light sensor (YF1). FixJ can then bind to its specialised promoter which controls the transcription of the yellow pigment (amilGFP). Exposure to blue light leads to the suppression in production of the yellow pigment. 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The remaining pigments, magenta and cyan, will combine to form a blue colour.
 +
 
 +
[[Image:Blue_Pathway.png‎|center||600px|Image: 600 pixels]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<!-- Yep, put both diagrams up! How about separating them up so we have the text for the diagram where red light is not present,then the diagram of that.  then the text for the diagram where red light is present, then the diagram for that one? or if that looks bizarre just put them both together after the text-->
 +
 
 +
=== The Future ===
 +
 
 +
Our project aims to provide a foundation for the control of organisms using multiple wavelengths of light for future development. Using lasers to control bacteria will provide high spatial control, while a well characterised system will provide good temporal control. Importantly, response is not limited to a molecular output. Possibilities include taxis, luminescence, electricity, magnetic fields and sound. As has been proven in past research, systems expressed in ''E.coli'' can be modified and expressed in a eukaryotic model. In consideration, such a system could enable finely controlled mixed volume outputs of medically relevant molecules, for example patient specific antibody treatment. From an economic angle, a calculatable light input will correlate to a desired complex output from a single customizable organism strain, vastly increasing production times from current processes. Attractively, laboratories will have reduced chemical usage and only require a single processing machine, as light is a cheap, easily manipulatable and mostly harm free resource.
 +
 +
<!-- High spatial and medium temporal control over each output should also be possible by the use of multi-wavelength lasers. This has many potential applications from the manufacturing of composite materials to control of engineered organisms in an environment.
 +
 +
As a sideline, we’re also going to test a new way of preserving and presenting bacterial culture using pouring plastics. Unfortunately, this would kill the bacteria, but should give academics a new way to physically present colonies and cultures they have been working on. For us, it will allow a way of easily transporting our “photographs” without unwieldy plates and gels.
 +
 +
As mentioned we will be using additive and subtractive colour combinations to allow synthesis of the correct pigment output, corresponding the colours of light the bacteria are exposed to. For example the NOT gated input of red light represses synthesis of cyan pigment enabling an output of yellow and magenta pigment. We hope to analyse the absorption spectrum of each pigment, both alone and in combination. Visualisation of light sensitivity throughout the system will enable calibration of the light input ensuring reliable output. Further to this other teams reported their light sensing systems working better at temperatures less than 37 degrees, which we will also investigate.
 +
 +
For the blue and red light sensors, the presence of their corresponding wavelength of light causes autophosphorylation of an intermediate protein. Phosphorylated intermediates then freely bind as repressors to the corresponding output gene (cyan for red light, yellow for blue light). With the green light sensor, a signal inverter will be introduced, as the FixJ system acts as an activator not a repressor (the exact opposite of what we want). Instead of acting on the gene coding for the output (magenta) the phosphorylated intermediate binds instead to a gene coding for the cI protein used in the lambda phage (a bacteriophage which infects E. coli). Once synthesised the cl protein acts as the output (magenta) repressor. -->
 +
<!--•Light receptors and pathways well characterised
 +
•Finely controlled output through variable light input
 +
•Ultra high resolution bio-camera (gigapixel) - physicists may have to explain this one!!
 +
•Complex materials manufacturing (silk??)
 +
•Cheap, simple and effective way of testing systems in the laboratory
 +
These ideas are from the london presentation)-->
 +
== So what do our constructs look like? ==
 +
As we have the three different light modules to work with, we can experiment with different techniques and companies when it comes to our assembly techniques and synthesis.
 +
[[Image:Better_Diagram_of_Red_Plasmid.png‎|center||600px|Image: 600 pixels]]
-
=== The Experiments ===
+
The Red Light Module is the "easiest" to work with, as we only need to be working with the red light sensor and cyan pigment (the intermediate protein, OmpR, is already present in the genome of <i>E. coli</i>, so we don't need to include the genes which code for it). We will try and assemble this module ourselves in the lab, using a variety of assembly techniques.
 +
The pink arrows indicate the direction of transcription. OmpF is the specific promoter which matches OmpR, the intermediate protein. The black brackets indicate the separate BioBricks (eg. BBa_S05058 is an RBS with the gene that codes for our cyan pigment).
 +
The cyan pigment has been placed before the red light sensor so that if there is accidental read-through, we're not getting unwanted transcription of the cyan pigment.
 +
[[Image:Better_Diagram_of_Blue_plasmid.png‎|center||700px|Image: 700 pixels]]
-
=== Part 3 ===
+
The Blue Light Module is being synthesised for us by DNA2.0. It includes YFI (our blue light sensor), FixJ (the intermediate protein) and amilGFP (our yellow pigment).
 +
The pink arrows indicate the direction of transcription. The central section, coding for FixJ, has been flipped backwards and upside-down. This ensure that, if we get accidental read-through from the RNA polymerase from YF1, the sequence for FixJ will code for nonsense. Nothing will be made which will interfere with our system.
 +
Again, the black brackets indicate individual BioBricks. The "TACTAG" indicates a sequence of TACTAG "scars" to space out the promoter for FixJ and the promoter for the yellow pigment. This is more of a precaution than anything else. The list of "STOP" codons acts a terminator.
 +
[[Image:Better_Diagram_of_Green_plasmid.png‎|center||800px|Image: 800 pixels]]
-
== Results ==
+
The Green Light Module is being synthesised using IDT gBlocks. cR indicates the promoter where the cI inverter protein binds. Again, we have some TACTAG spacers between the promoters, and some sections have been flipped backwards and upside-down. The directions of transcription are shown with pink arrows.

Latest revision as of 14:01, 22 August 2013

Home Team Official Team Profile Project Part Submissions Modelling Notebook Safety Attributions

Contents

Project Description

Our project aims to produce a group of BioBricks organised into three modules; one each for Red, Green and Blue ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_color RGB]) light. To demonstrate the system we will control the production of Cyan, Magenta and Yellow pigments, but we will also be inputting a system where future teams could have any gene as their "output" gene. We are using the CMY pigments, but you could potentially use the RGB light to control the transcription of anything.

The ultimate aim of our project is to use ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtractive_color CMY]) pigments to produce the world's first colour bio-photograph or [http://parts.igem.org/Coliroid coliroid].

We will be building upon the work done by previous iGEM teams, most notably Texas/Austin 2004, Edinburgh 2010 and Uppsala 2011.

If you would like to see any of our initial brainstorming - please feel free to follow this link (Brainstorming)

The Camera

Bio-Photography is the application of genetically engineered bacteria to act as the light sensor of a camera, replacing digital sensors (CCD/CMOS) or photographic film. The surface area of bacteria is on the order of microns, much smaller than a digital sensor, giving bio-cameras the potential to produce images with far greater resolution than current digital photography offers.

We aim to produce the world's first colour bio-photograph by producing Cyan, Magenta and Yellow pigments in response to Red, Green and Blue light. We plan to combine this system with a lens to focus the image onto plated bacteria to form the world's first colour bio-camera.

Colour system

To produce the full colour spectrum requires all three [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_color primary colours]. This is because any colour can be produced by mixing the primary colours but primary colours cannot be produced by mixing any colours.

In our system we are using two sets of primary colours. Red, Green and Blue for light and Cyan, Magenta and Yellow for pigments. This is because light and pigment mix differently; light is additive and pigment is subtractive:

Image: 500 pixels


Light and pigment produce colour in different ways. While coloured light has a peak wavelength corresponding to its colour, coloured pigment absorbs all wavelengths that do not correspond to its colour and so reflect the corresponding coloured light:


In this system, red light is the opposite of cyan pigment, green light is the opposite of magenta pigment, and blue light is the opposite of yellow pigment. Hence our choice of sensors and pigments.

It must be noted that while [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RGB_color_model RGB] light give a full spectrum of colour and tone, CMY is a simplified version of the CYMK colour system used in printing. This was done because to engineer the pathways for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMYK_color_model CYMK] colour system outputs is too complex (see logic gates below). However, as CMY is subtractive there will be tone as Cyan + Magenta + Yellow will approximate black.

Image: 500 pixels


This shows the logic gates required if we included a black pigment (K). Not very simple, and near impossible to input into an E. coli! However, when the black pigment is removed, the logic gates simplify down very neatly...

Image: 400 pixels

This system shows red light suppressing the production of our cyan pigment, green light suppressing the magenta pigment and blue light supressing the yellow pigment.

The Biology

The focus of our wet work is the creation of three independent 'light to output' pathways in E. coli. Each pathway will control the transcription of selected genes using Red, Green or Blue light. Incident light will prevent the transcription of the selected gene.

In our bio-camera the controlled genes will be those that code for the production of cyan, magenta and yellow pigments:

  • Red light prevents the production of Cyan pigment
  • Green light prevents the production of Magenta pigment
  • Blue light prevents the production of Yellow pigment
Image: 300 pixels


Each sensor prevents the production of its opposing pigment, producing the pigment which is the same colour of light that the light sensor detects. The mix of pigments will reproduce the colour of light incident on the bacteria.

If you'd like to have a go at mixing pigments and lights for yourself, why not play the colour mixing game at the bottom of our Notebook page? More difficult than you'd think!

Red light pathway

This pathway uses the well characterised Cph8 red light sensor (composing of Cph1 and Envz). When there is no red light present, this protein causes the phosphorylation of OmpR, to OmpR-P. This then diffuses away from the red light sensor, and can bind to a specialised OmpF promoter sequence which is upstream of the HO-pcyA gene which codes for cyan pigment and stop codon. This is then transcribed and cyan pigment is produced.

When Cph8 is exposed to red light, the phosphorylation of OmpR ceases. The OmpR is not capable of diffusing away from the red light sensor, so does not bind to the OmpF promoter before the cyan pigment gene. This means that the cyan pigment can not be generated. Cyan pigment in this system will be repressed, whereas magenta and yellow pigments will still be produced, which when mixed create a red pigment.

Image: 600 pixels

Green light pathway

The green light module works differently to the red and blue light modules but it still uses a light sensor (CcaS), intermediate protein (CcaR) and a specialised promoter. However, when the system is exposed to green light, CcaR is phosphorylated and CcaR-P is generated, allowing the synthesis of the magenta pigment to be up regulated instead of prevented. To make an overall green colour, we only want the yellow and cyan pigments to be transcribed, so production of the magenta pigment is problematic.

To overcome this issue, we will introduce an inverter system. CcaR-P will be produced when the bacteria are exposed to green light, but instead of binding to a promoter placed before the gene coding for magenta pigment, it will bind to a cI repressor system. The subsequent transcription of the cI repressor protein will prevent the synthesis of the magenta pigment, as it will bind to a cI promoter. Binding of cI to this promoter ceases transcription of any following genes, therefore magenta will not be produced.

Image: 600 pixels

Blue light pathway

The YtvA/FixL blue light sensor phosphorylates FixJ to FixJ-p in the absence of blue light. FixJ-p then binds to the promoter for the yellow pigment gene and stop codon. In the absence of blue light the Yellow pigment is produced.

The blue light module works in much the same way as the red light module; absence of blue light allows the phosphorylation of an intermediate protein (FixJ) by the blue light sensor (YF1). FixJ can then bind to its specialised promoter which controls the transcription of the yellow pigment (amilGFP). Exposure to blue light leads to the suppression in production of the yellow pigment.


The remaining pigments, magenta and cyan, will combine to form a blue colour.

Image: 600 pixels


The Future

Our project aims to provide a foundation for the control of organisms using multiple wavelengths of light for future development. Using lasers to control bacteria will provide high spatial control, while a well characterised system will provide good temporal control. Importantly, response is not limited to a molecular output. Possibilities include taxis, luminescence, electricity, magnetic fields and sound. As has been proven in past research, systems expressed in E.coli can be modified and expressed in a eukaryotic model. In consideration, such a system could enable finely controlled mixed volume outputs of medically relevant molecules, for example patient specific antibody treatment. From an economic angle, a calculatable light input will correlate to a desired complex output from a single customizable organism strain, vastly increasing production times from current processes. Attractively, laboratories will have reduced chemical usage and only require a single processing machine, as light is a cheap, easily manipulatable and mostly harm free resource.


So what do our constructs look like?

As we have the three different light modules to work with, we can experiment with different techniques and companies when it comes to our assembly techniques and synthesis.

Image: 600 pixels

The Red Light Module is the "easiest" to work with, as we only need to be working with the red light sensor and cyan pigment (the intermediate protein, OmpR, is already present in the genome of E. coli, so we don't need to include the genes which code for it). We will try and assemble this module ourselves in the lab, using a variety of assembly techniques.

The pink arrows indicate the direction of transcription. OmpF is the specific promoter which matches OmpR, the intermediate protein. The black brackets indicate the separate BioBricks (eg. BBa_S05058 is an RBS with the gene that codes for our cyan pigment).

The cyan pigment has been placed before the red light sensor so that if there is accidental read-through, we're not getting unwanted transcription of the cyan pigment.

Image: 700 pixels

The Blue Light Module is being synthesised for us by DNA2.0. It includes YFI (our blue light sensor), FixJ (the intermediate protein) and amilGFP (our yellow pigment).

The pink arrows indicate the direction of transcription. The central section, coding for FixJ, has been flipped backwards and upside-down. This ensure that, if we get accidental read-through from the RNA polymerase from YF1, the sequence for FixJ will code for nonsense. Nothing will be made which will interfere with our system.

Again, the black brackets indicate individual BioBricks. The "TACTAG" indicates a sequence of TACTAG "scars" to space out the promoter for FixJ and the promoter for the yellow pigment. This is more of a precaution than anything else. The list of "STOP" codons acts a terminator.

Image: 800 pixels

The Green Light Module is being synthesised using IDT gBlocks. cR indicates the promoter where the cI inverter protein binds. Again, we have some TACTAG spacers between the promoters, and some sections have been flipped backwards and upside-down. The directions of transcription are shown with pink arrows.