Team:EPF Lausanne/Calendar/23 September 2013

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Template:EPFL2013Header}}
{{Template:EPFL2013Header}}
-
Sensing <BR>
+
<font size = "4"> Sensing </font> <BR>
-
'''Measuring GFP expression with a plate reader''' <BR>
+
''Measuring GFP expression with a plate reader'' <BR>
-
Again we let the bacteria with the three different promoters grow in media with different pHs. Only the constitutive promoter had a very strong GFP expression, which was as expected, since it served as positive control. But again neither the hya nor the cad promoters seemed to be induced. Furthermore, the bacteria in the acidic ph (at 5.5) died very quickly.
+
-Again we let the bacteria with the three different promoters grow in media with different pHs. Only the constitutive promoter had a very strong GFP expression, which was as expected, since it served as positive control. But again neither the hya nor the cad promoters seemed to be induced. Furthermore, the bacteria in the acidic ph (at 5.5) died very quickly.
 +
<BR><BR>
 +
<font size = "4"> Nanoparticles</font> <BR>
-
'''Nanoparticles'''
+
''Microscopy of Nanoparticles''<BR>
-
 
+
Microscopy of the biotinylated FITC-D and rGFP loaded NPs.
Microscopy of the biotinylated FITC-D and rGFP loaded NPs.
{{Template:EPFL2013Footer}}
{{Template:EPFL2013Footer}}

Revision as of 17:04, 3 October 2013

Taxi.Coli: Smart Drug Delivery iGEM EPFL

Header

Sensing

Measuring GFP expression with a plate reader
-Again we let the bacteria with the three different promoters grow in media with different pHs. Only the constitutive promoter had a very strong GFP expression, which was as expected, since it served as positive control. But again neither the hya nor the cad promoters seemed to be induced. Furthermore, the bacteria in the acidic ph (at 5.5) died very quickly.

Nanoparticles

Microscopy of Nanoparticles
Microscopy of the biotinylated FITC-D and rGFP loaded NPs.