Team:Braunschweig/Notebook
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Line 115: | Line 115: | ||
<p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px"> | <p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px"> | ||
<b>Investigators: Kevin, Kerstin, Laura</b><br> | <b>Investigators: Kevin, Kerstin, Laura</b><br> | ||
- | Cells from yesterday's transformation only grew on agar plates containing ampicillin. The plates with the additional antibiotics were empty, thus we can conclude that our competent <i>E. coli</i> XL1Blue MRF cells do not carry other antibiotic | + | Cells from yesterday's transformation only grew on agar plates containing ampicillin. The plates with the additional antibiotics were empty, thus we can conclude that our competent <i>E. coli</i> XL1Blue MRF cells do not carry other antibiotic resistances.<br> |
111 colonies were counted for pUC18 transformation, 50 for pUC19 transformation on ampicillin containing agar plates. According to these numbers the transformation Efficiency was calculated.<br> | 111 colonies were counted for pUC18 transformation, 50 for pUC19 transformation on ampicillin containing agar plates. According to these numbers the transformation Efficiency was calculated.<br> | ||
Transformation efficiency:<br> | Transformation efficiency:<br> | ||
Line 349: | Line 349: | ||
<div id="Week5" class="menuSection"> | <div id="Week5" class="menuSection"> | ||
<h2><a href="#Week5">Week 5: June 16 - June 22, 2013</a></h2> | <h2><a href="#Week5">Week 5: June 16 - June 22, 2013</a></h2> | ||
- | <p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;">This week was dominated by a lot of cloning. We equipped our constitutive and inducible promoters with ribosome binding sites, terminators, an | + | <p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;">This week was dominated by a lot of cloning. We equipped our constitutive and inducible promoters with ribosome binding sites, terminators, an ampicillin resistance gene and a lactonase (not all of them got each of these elements). Additionally, we separated the ampicillin resistance gene from its native promoter in order to make its expression inducible. Although cloning was mostly successful, we were struggling to amplify and purified the <i>luxR</i> brick (C0062), which cost us a lot of time and effort. Unfortunately, it also wasn’t rewarded with success in the end.<br> |
Another important step was to adapt our cloning strategy towards new chromoproteins which we received from iGEM team Uppsala. These allow us to evaluate our cultivation experiments solely with own equipment, rather than having to find a cell sorter with suitable excitement lasers for all fluorescent proteins.</p> | Another important step was to adapt our cloning strategy towards new chromoproteins which we received from iGEM team Uppsala. These allow us to evaluate our cultivation experiments solely with own equipment, rather than having to find a cell sorter with suitable excitement lasers for all fluorescent proteins.</p> | ||
Line 360: | Line 360: | ||
<b>Investigators: Laura, Oliver, Jan </b><br> | <b>Investigators: Laura, Oliver, Jan </b><br> | ||
Today, we digested the inducible promoters, followed by purification and clean-up. Then we equipped the inducible and previously digested constitutive promoters with a RBS (B0032) by ligating respective parts. Subsequently, these ligated constructs were used to transform competent bacteria. | Today, we digested the inducible promoters, followed by purification and clean-up. Then we equipped the inducible and previously digested constitutive promoters with a RBS (B0032) by ligating respective parts. Subsequently, these ligated constructs were used to transform competent bacteria. | ||
- | We also inoculated overnight suspension cultures with B0015- and B0032-transformed <i>E. coli</i> cells from | + | We also inoculated overnight suspension cultures with B0015- and B0032-transformed <i>E. coli</i> cells from glycerol stocks for DNA preparation.</p> |
Line 368: | Line 368: | ||
<p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px"> | <p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px"> | ||
<b>Investigators: Kevin, Jan</b><br> | <b>Investigators: Kevin, Jan</b><br> | ||
- | We performed a colony PCR to test if cloning from the previous day was successful. Positively tested clones were used to inoculate | + | We performed a colony PCR to test if cloning from the previous day was successful. Positively tested clones were used to inoculate 2xYT liquid cultures for DNA preparation. Overnight suspension cultures of B0015- and B0032-transformed cells were used for DNA preparation.<br> |
- | In order to separate the | + | In order to separate the ampicillin resistance gene from its native promoter we performed a Phusion-PCR with appropriate primers on the P1002 brick.</p> |
Line 377: | Line 377: | ||
<p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px"> | <p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px"> | ||
<b>Investigators: Roman, Laura, Kerstin</b><br> | <b>Investigators: Roman, Laura, Kerstin</b><br> | ||
- | In order to harvest the successfully ligated bricks, DNA of | + | In order to harvest the successfully ligated bricks, DNA of liquid cultures from positively tested clones was prepared for sequencing. |
We also repeated the colony PCR of the last four ligations as they showed questionable restriction patterns. | We also repeated the colony PCR of the last four ligations as they showed questionable restriction patterns. | ||
After the second colony PCR was also found to be negative, these parts were once again digested, including gel extraction and purification. Furthermore, the previously amplified <i>ampR</i> gene was purified by gel electrophoresis. However, gel extraction did not yield enough DNA to work with. | After the second colony PCR was also found to be negative, these parts were once again digested, including gel extraction and purification. Furthermore, the previously amplified <i>ampR</i> gene was purified by gel electrophoresis. However, gel extraction did not yield enough DNA to work with. | ||
Line 389: | Line 389: | ||
<b>Investigators: Laura, Oliver</b><br> | <b>Investigators: Laura, Oliver</b><br> | ||
First, we performed another Phusion-PCR on <i>ampR</i> (P1002 brick) since the first PCR did not yield enough DNA. We also tried to amplify the <i>luxR</i> gene (C0062) through Phusion-PCR from pSB1A2 plasmid. However, not enough DNA was obtained and digestion of the purified PCR product did not show the expected bands.<br> | First, we performed another Phusion-PCR on <i>ampR</i> (P1002 brick) since the first PCR did not yield enough DNA. We also tried to amplify the <i>luxR</i> gene (C0062) through Phusion-PCR from pSB1A2 plasmid. However, not enough DNA was obtained and digestion of the purified PCR product did not show the expected bands.<br> | ||
- | More digestions were set up to harvest the separated | + | More digestions were set up to harvest the separated ampicillin resistance gene and prepare DNA for the next cloning round. Additionally, lactonase (C0060) was ligated with a RBS (B0032), the <i>ampR</i> gene was cloned behind our inducible promoters and we ligated each autoinducer synthetase with a RBS (B0032) overnight. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 395: | Line 395: | ||
<p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px"> | <p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px"> | ||
<b>Investigators: Laura, Jan, Oliver, Roman</b><br> | <b>Investigators: Laura, Jan, Oliver, Roman</b><br> | ||
- | The overnight ligation was followed by transformation of competent <i>E.coli</i> cells. In parallel, PCR for C0062 from pSB1A2 was done using Phusion and Q5 polymerase. However, both preparations were negative, so we purified the other two repressor/activator genes (C0071, C0079) by gel extraction. Subsequently we ligated these bricks with a constitutive promoter. As usual, we transformed competent bacteria with the ligated vectors. | + | The overnight ligation was followed by transformation of competent <i>E.coli</i> XL1Blue MRF cells. In parallel, PCR for C0062 from pSB1A2 was done using Phusion and Q5 polymerase. However, both preparations were negative, so we purified the other two repressor/activator genes (C0071, C0079) by gel extraction. Subsequently, we ligated these bricks with a constitutive promoter. As usual, we transformed competent bacteria with the ligated vectors. |
- | Furthermore, Phusion- and Q5-PCR was repeated with different annealing temperatures, which were also negative. | + | Furthermore, Phusion- and Q5-PCR was repeated with different annealing temperatures, which were also all negative. |
We also changed our cloning strategy as we thankfully received new chromoproteins from iGEM team Uppsala. | We also changed our cloning strategy as we thankfully received new chromoproteins from iGEM team Uppsala. | ||
</p> | </p> |
Revision as of 17:19, 3 October 2013
Labjournal
This is the documentation of our lab work. An overview on how we approached this project can be found under Approach. For detailed protocols of certain procedures please refer to Protocols. Attributions are given for each day, however please check our Attributions section for efforts beyond the lab work.