"
21/08/13
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
AliceHaworth (Talk | contribs) |
AliceHaworth (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
*a 20G syringe was used ~24 times squirt the herring sperm DNA in order to make it less viscous. | *a 20G syringe was used ~24 times squirt the herring sperm DNA in order to make it less viscous. | ||
*30G syringe was also used . | *30G syringe was also used . | ||
| - | *This method | + | *This method seems to work better than the sonification. |
Revision as of 10:53, 22 August 2013
| Home | Team | Official Team Profile | Project | Parts Submitted to the Registry | Modeling | Notebook | Safety | Attributions |
|---|
Reculturing Bacteria
- The P. putida grew overnight, which proved that we had viable cells.
- The bacteria was then re-streaked to single colonies and left to grow overnight in a 37C incubator.
Isolation of P. putida DNA
- 8 1.5ml samples were isolated from each of the 2 broths that were prepared yesterday.
- The first few steps of CTAB protocol was used to prep cells for DNA isolation;
- The 8 samples were spun down at 10000 rpm for 5 mins.
- The supernatant was discarded.
- cells were then resuspended in 1ml of TE.
- 740ul of this new mixture was transferred to 8 new eppendorf tubes.
- 20ul of lysozyme was added to each of these 8 samples.
- A maxwell robot was then used to complete the DNA extraction process.
hydrodynamic shearing of Herring Sperm DNA
- a 20G syringe was used ~24 times squirt the herring sperm DNA in order to make it less viscous.
- 30G syringe was also used .
- This method seems to work better than the sonification.
