"
Team:BGU Israel/HPOverview
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Neta.weiss (Talk | contribs) |
Neta.weiss (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| - | The <b>novel approach</b> we suggest is based on <h12>massive outreach</h12> massive outreach and < | + | The <b>novel approach</b> we suggest is based on <h12>massive outreach</h12> massive outreach and <h13>creativity & innovation</h13>. </br></br> |
| - | <q>“After all, there is room for only one Prime Minister, but for those who make the desert bloom there is room for hundreds, thousands and even millions. And the destiny of the state is in the hands of the many rather than of a single individual.</q>”[1]    <i>David Ben Gurion, first Prime Minister of Israel.</i></br></br> | + | <q>“After all, there is room for only one Prime Minister, but for those who make the desert bloom there is room for hundreds, thousands and even millions. And the destiny of the state is in the hands of the many rather than of a single individual.</q>”[1] <i>David Ben Gurion, first Prime Minister of Israel.</i></br></br> |
We embarked on a <h12> massive outreach</h12> campaign to encourage discourse with the public about synthetic biology, in order to dispel misconceptions and foster debate. By spreading the word about iGEM and our project, we gave people a chance, sometimes for the first time, to hear about synthetic biology and about the innovative biological patents that already exist. We saw this happen first within our team: because we come from a wide range of disciplines, there are some members who had no scientific background at all, and who were amazed by the capabilities of synthetic biology. The resulting dialogue ended up benefiting both sides, as the non-biologists brought a fresh perspective and challenged some of the precepts that those of us in research tend to take for granted. </br></br> | We embarked on a <h12> massive outreach</h12> campaign to encourage discourse with the public about synthetic biology, in order to dispel misconceptions and foster debate. By spreading the word about iGEM and our project, we gave people a chance, sometimes for the first time, to hear about synthetic biology and about the innovative biological patents that already exist. We saw this happen first within our team: because we come from a wide range of disciplines, there are some members who had no scientific background at all, and who were amazed by the capabilities of synthetic biology. The resulting dialogue ended up benefiting both sides, as the non-biologists brought a fresh perspective and challenged some of the precepts that those of us in research tend to take for granted. </br></br> | ||
Revision as of 14:16, 21 September 2013
Human Practice Overview
In the earliest stages of brainstorming about our project, we asked ourselves:
What is standing in the way of making synthetic biology projects reality?
There are hundreds of biologically engineered systems that have been developed, but the move from the lab into the real world has been slow. What is holding up progress? We concluded that there are two main issues that are stopping this field from realizing its full potential: 1) There are too many risks and unknown consequences. 2) There is not enough public support. Our project, the development of an autonomous self-destruct mechanism to control GMO populations after release, focused on the former, but what about public opinion? Although synthetic biology research is developing at a dizzying pace, the general public has been left behind with the same misconceptions and concerns. The representation of advances in this field in the mainstream media is shallow and often misleading, and the level of scientific literacy among the general public is sadly lacking. The novel approach we suggest is based on
“After all, there is room for only one Prime Minister, but for those who make the desert bloom there is room for hundreds, thousands and even millions. And the destiny of the state is in the hands of the many rather than of a single individual.”[1] David Ben Gurion, first Prime Minister of Israel. We embarked on a
References:[1]DAVID BEN-GURION, “Why I Retired to the Desert,” The New York Times Magazine, March 28, 1954, p. 47. Our human practice activities can be divided into the following three categories:
