Summary

Future work

So far, we have accomplished all the modules we designed, specifically , we shows that the modified VP16-luxR can bind AHL and recruit POL II and trigger the expression of downstream gene as we detected the expression of mCherry. However, the proportion of yeast with strong flurosence signal reveal to be comparably low. As we use the multiple copy vector of yeast, the pRS423 as vector, we strongly suspected that the difference of plasmid copy number between individual is significant. Thus, the attempt of changing the vector, such as using centromere-like vector will be carried in the future.

Secondly, we see few cells in control group with positive mCherry signal. Recall the our plasmid design, as we didn’t add the terminator at the end of each gene, the possibility of leakage between the luxR and the mCherry will in certain degree enhance the background mCherry signal. We plan to add the terminator between luxR and mCherry to optimize our measurement.

Thirdly, we proved that the mammalian cell tet-off system we used indeed works in a certain efficiency, that is, when the tetR expressed, it can bind with the TetO and trigger the downstream gene expression. However, as the time limited, we didn’t test if the tetR in different single copy plasmids can also drive the tetO downstream gene expression. We will test this in the future to prove that the mating can be effective and different haploid carried with sensor and reporter can communicate by virtue of tet-off system as expected.

Finally, we have tested if the yeast strain we used can be made into the dry powder and can be reactivated several days later just as baker yeast. Our results successfully show that the method we used to deal with the yeast dry powder indeed retain its activity for at least 3 weeks, yet we need to further prove that the method we raised to produce the test paper can also works. That is, if we put the grow medium in the form of powder can also support the yeast to grow.