|
- Small Phage
- March-April
- May-June
- July-August
- September-October
|
10.8 Characterization of Mutant Phage
I) Purpose
- To characterize the mutant phage we selected from 9.13 Mutagen Concentration Test
II) Expected Outcome
- EM pictures of phage with distinctively larger or smaller size.
- Sequencing results that map out mutations that induce T7 phage capsid size changes.
III) Reagents Used
- Mutant phage S4, S10, and L8
IV) Procedure
1) Overview of previous attempts before iGEM Regional Jamboree
- Before the Regional Jamboree, we identified our S4, S10, and L8 mutant. We tried to sequence their capsid genes (with the help of Dr. Grose) and take pictures using TEM. Unfortunately, the sequencing results' accuracy was less than 20%. And our phage does not have a high enough titer to be seen under electron microscope.
- Thus we started off our characterization procedures with designing new primers (BI319 and BI320) and propagating our mutant phage.
2) Propagating Mutant Phage (10.10)
- Three different conditions of propagation was used for WT, S4, S10, and L8
- - Erlenmeyer flask: 10 mL LB + 1 mL E coli B liquid culture overnight + 10 uL of phage
- - 15 mL centrifuge tube: 5 mL LB + 0.5 mL E coli B liquid culture overnight + 10 uL of phage
- - autoclaved test tube: 1 mL of LB + 100 uL E coli B liquid culture overnight + 10 uL of phage
- Wild-type and mutant phages were allowed to propagate for approximately 24 hours before purified via centrifugation and choloroform.
- Spot tests at -2, -4, -6, and -8 was performed for each sample to estimated phage concentration after propagation.
- Each phage sample was then plated at -7 using x4 agar to verify the mutants' phenotypic stability after propagation.
V) Results
2) Propagating Mutant Phage
- Plaque formed up to -6 for each sample, implying a concentration of at least 10E8 PFU/mL
- Propagated phage retained their larger or smaller capsid size as confirmed by their smaller and larger plaque sizes at x4 agar.
ADD PICTURE OF PLATE
VI) Conclusion
|
"
