Team:Braunschweig/Notebook

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m
Line 227: Line 227:
We transformed our ligations from yesterday using our competent glycerol stocks without prior heat inactivation of T4-ligase. Transformed cells were plated on agar plates containing glucose and Chloramphenicol and were grown at 37 °C over night.<br>
We transformed our ligations from yesterday using our competent glycerol stocks without prior heat inactivation of T4-ligase. Transformed cells were plated on agar plates containing glucose and Chloramphenicol and were grown at 37 °C over night.<br>
To test the success of our ligation beforehand we conducted a colony-PCR (see protocoll colony-PCR, Extension time 30 s) using 1 µL of our untransformed ligation mix of C0061+B0015 and B0032+J23100 as template. The conducted gel electrophoresis was visualized and showed a band of the expected size for B0032+J23100. The band for C0061+B0015 was too small. Further investigation revealed the chosen extension was too short.<br>
To test the success of our ligation beforehand we conducted a colony-PCR (see protocoll colony-PCR, Extension time 30 s) using 1 µL of our untransformed ligation mix of C0061+B0015 and B0032+J23100 as template. The conducted gel electrophoresis was visualized and showed a band of the expected size for B0032+J23100. The band for C0061+B0015 was too small. Further investigation revealed the chosen extension was too short.<br>
-
We also send some of the Bricks miniprepped on June 3, 2013 for sequencing.</p>
+
We also send some of the Bricks miniprepped on June 3, 2013 for sequencing (primers VR and VF2).</p>
   </div>
   </div>
Line 235: Line 235:
<p><p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;">This week we confirmed the successful cloning of the constitutive promoter + RBS. Furthermore we confirmed the addition of the TT to the autoinducer synthases and the lactonase. More biobrick sequences were verified. However, we observed some point mutations in the prefix/suffix sequences of some bricks as well as major annotation differences in the biobrick C0061.
<p><p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;">This week we confirmed the successful cloning of the constitutive promoter + RBS. Furthermore we confirmed the addition of the TT to the autoinducer synthases and the lactonase. More biobrick sequences were verified. However, we observed some point mutations in the prefix/suffix sequences of some bricks as well as major annotation differences in the biobrick C0061.
</p>
</p>
 +
 +
<p><p style="font-size:14px; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:none; border:none; color:#be1e3c; margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px">Sunday, June 9, 2013</p>
 +
 +
<p><p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px">
 +
<b>Investigators: </b><br>
 +
We ran a colony PCR of 2 clones of each ligation (transformation from June 6, 2013) and the biobricks P1002 and K091117 (primers VF2 and VR).<br>
 +
We also inoculated overnight cultures for plasmid preparations the next day.</p>
 +
 +
<p><p style="font-size:14px; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:none; border:none; color:#be1e3c; margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px">Monday, June 10, 2013</p>
 +
 +
<p><p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px">
 +
<b>Investigators: </b><br>
 +
We analyzed yesterday’s colony PCR gelelectrophoresis for the expected fragment sizes. All clones were positive(clone 1 of J23100+B0032 and J23106+B0032 did not contain the promoters as later shown by DNA sequencing.
 +
<img alt="June10" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/50/Braunschweig_Lab_Journal_June_10.png" width="600" align="center" vspace="0" hspace="10"/><br><br>
 +
We isolated the plasmid DNA from all clones with a Miniprep Kit following the manufacturer’s instructions.</p>
 +
 +
<p><p style="font-size:14px; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:none; border:none; color:#be1e3c; margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px">Tuesday, June 11, 2013</p>
 +
 +
<p><p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px">
 +
<b>Investigators: Kerstin, Laura </b><br>
 +
We transformed the chemically competent E.coli XL1 Blue MRF’ with the ligation C0061+B0015 (prepared on June 6, 2013) and the biobrick E0420 (eCFP).<br>
 +
The plasmid DNA isolated the day before was sent to GATC for sequencing.<br>
 +
The DNA sequences from June 7, 2013 were analyzed by sequence alignment with the vector maps.
 +
The biobricks C0079, C0078, C0070 and B0032 were sequence verified. However, the biobrick C0061 did not match the annotated sequence. The prefix was missing and there was an additional oligonucleotide sequence in the 5’ region of the biobrick. This led to the assumption that C0061 might be a composite part.</p>
 +
 +
 +
 +
<p><p style="font-size:14px; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:none; border:none; color:#be1e3c; margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px">Wednesday, June 12, 2013</p>
 +
 +
<p><p style="margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-top:0px">
 +
<b>Investigators: Tabea, Oliver </b><br>
 +
<img alt="June10" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/5/52/Braunschweig_Lab_Journal_June_12.png" width="100" align="right" vspace="0" hspace="10"/>
 +
The biobrick B0015 was amplified by PCR using the resuspended DNA from the distribution kit as a template. The PCR was successful (expected fragment size was 443 bp).<br>
 +
A colony PCR of 2 clones of each of yesterday’s transformations (E0420 and C0061+B0015) was run (primers VF2 and VR). Overnight cultures of the analyzed clones were inoculated.<br>
 +
The remaining DNA sequences (from June 7,2013) were analyzed by sequence alignment. While the Biobricks J06702, B0012, C0071, R0062 and R0071 were sequence verified, the biobrick C0062 did not match the sequence, the DNA sequencing for clone 2 failed. Furthermore the sequence alignment of E0240 revealed additional 25 bp after the EcoRI restriction site.The DNA sequence of E0430 was confirmed except for a point mutation (T to A between Not/I and XbaI restriction site) as well as the biobrick J23112 which contained a point mutation in the prefix sequence (T to A).
   </div>
   </div>

Revision as of 23:04, 15 September 2013

Labjournal

linie rot 8pix hoch

This is the documentation of our lab work. For detailed protocols of certain procedures please refer to Protocols. Attributions are given for each day, however please check our Attributions section for efforts beyond the lab work.

Our sponsors

linie rot 8pix hoch