"
Team:Braunschweig/Notebook
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
<div id="Week3" class="menuSection"> | <div id="Week3" class="menuSection"> | ||
<h2><a href="#Week3">Week 3: June 2 - June 8, 2013</a></h2> | <h2><a href="#Week3">Week 3: June 2 - June 8, 2013</a></h2> | ||
| - | <p><p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;"> | + | <p><p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;">This week we successfully cloned and transformed some of our first combination Bricks. We also managed to obtain some BioBricks that could not be transformed via Phusion-PCR directly from resuspended DNA.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="Week4" class="menuSection"> | <div id="Week4" class="menuSection"> | ||
<h2><a href="#Week4">Week 4: June 9 - June 15, 2013</a></h2> | <h2><a href="#Week4">Week 4: June 9 - June 15, 2013</a></h2> | ||
| - | <p><p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;"> | + | <p><p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;">This week we confirmed the successful cloning of the constitutive promoter + RBS. Furthermore we confirmed the addition of the TT to the autoinducer synthases and the lactonase. More biobrick sequences were verified. However, we observed some point mutations in the prefix/suffix sequences of some bricks as well as major annotation differences in the biobrick C0061. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 140: | Line 140: | ||
<div id="Week5" class="menuSection"> | <div id="Week5" class="menuSection"> | ||
<h2><a href="#Week5">Week 5: June 16 - June 22, 2013</a></h2> | <h2><a href="#Week5">Week 5: June 16 - June 22, 2013</a></h2> | ||
| - | <p><p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;"> | + | <p><p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;">This week was dominated by a lot of cloning. We equipped our constitutive and inducible promoters with ribosome binding sites, terminators, an ampicillin resistance gene and a lactonase (not all of them got each of these elements). Additionally, we separated the ampicillin resistance gene from its native promoter in order to make its expression inducible. Although cloning was mostly successful, we were struggling to amplify and purify the luxR brick (C0062), which cost us a lot of time and effort. Unfortunately, it also wasn’t rewarded with success in the end.</p> |
| - | + | <p><p style=" margin-left:5px; margin-right:5px;">Another important step was to adapt our cloning strategy towards new chromoproteins which we received from iGEM team Uppsala. These allow us to evaluate our cultuvation experiments solely with own equipment, rather than having to find a cell sorter with suitable excitement lasers for all fluorescent proteins.</p> | |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 21:04, 12 August 2013
Labjournal
Our sponsors
