Team:EPF Lausanne/Results summary

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 10: Line 10:
These experiments show that two cargo transport strategies are possible: an external labeling (the one we used with CY5) or an internal loading (with FITC-Dextran and rGFP).
These experiments show that two cargo transport strategies are possible: an external labeling (the one we used with CY5) or an internal loading (with FITC-Dextran and rGFP).
-
[[Image:Team-EPF-Lausanne_results_NPs_DLS1.jpg|thumb|400x|left|Figure 1 : DLS experiment results of the first nanoparticles we obtained: their mean diameter is a bit below 200 nm.]]
+
[[Image:Team-EPF-Lausanne_results_NPs_DLS1.jpg|thumb|400x|left|Figure 1: DLS experiment results of the first nanoparticles we obtained: their mean diameter is a bit below 200 nm.]]
[[Image:Team-EPF-Lausanne_results_ELISA-like2.jpg|thumb|600x|left|Figure 2: ELISA-like assay. The high absorbance in wells B and H (containing biotinylated nanoparticles) was quantitatively detected using a plate reader. It showed that the nanoparticles were well biotinylated.]]
[[Image:Team-EPF-Lausanne_results_ELISA-like2.jpg|thumb|600x|left|Figure 2: ELISA-like assay. The high absorbance in wells B and H (containing biotinylated nanoparticles) was quantitatively detected using a plate reader. It showed that the nanoparticles were well biotinylated.]]
 +
 +
[[Image:Team-EPF-Lausanne_results_confocal_positive.jpg|thumb|300px |left| Figure 3: Confocal microscopy image showing outer CY5 labeling of the nanoparticles. The size of those nanoparticles is around 200 nm, which corresponds to the previous DLS characterization.]]
==Cell surface expression:==
==Cell surface expression:==
Line 29: Line 31:
<!--
<!--
-
 
-
 
-
The biotinylation was chemically made with activated biotin and assessed with an ELISA-like method.
 
-
<br>
 
-
 
-
<br>
 
-
Biotinylated nanoparticles were labeled with a dye and observed under microscope.
 
-
<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>
 
-
[[Image:Team-EPF-Lausanne_results_confocal_positive.jpg|thumb|300px | left| Figure 3 ]]
 
<br>
<br>
Once we proved that we could obtain nanoparticles, the loading was tried with two distinct fluorescent molecules : GFP, relatively small, and FITC-dextran, with a large MW due to sugars. FITC fluorescent images showed the incorporation of the molecule, while nanoparticles were not able to incorporate GFP, maybe due to its small MW or the acetone steps during the protocol.
Once we proved that we could obtain nanoparticles, the loading was tried with two distinct fluorescent molecules : GFP, relatively small, and FITC-dextran, with a large MW due to sugars. FITC fluorescent images showed the incorporation of the molecule, while nanoparticles were not able to incorporate GFP, maybe due to its small MW or the acetone steps during the protocol.

Revision as of 21:07, 4 October 2013

Taxi.Coli: Smart Drug Delivery iGEM EPFL

Header

This section provides a short summary of our main experimental achievements.



Nanoparticles:

We successfully synthesized different batches of nanoparticles, whose mean diameter is in a range between 200 nm and 300 nm. We ended up with seven different collections of samples: simple naked gelatin nanoparticles, simple biotinylated nanoparticles, CY5-labeled biotinylated nanoparticles, rGFP loaded nanoparticles (naked and biotinylated) and FITC-Dextran loaded nanoparticles (naked and biotinylated). All of them were characterized by DLS. These experiments show that two cargo transport strategies are possible: an external labeling (the one we used with CY5) or an internal loading (with FITC-Dextran and rGFP).

Figure 1: DLS experiment results of the first nanoparticles we obtained: their mean diameter is a bit below 200 nm.
Figure 2: ELISA-like assay. The high absorbance in wells B and H (containing biotinylated nanoparticles) was quantitatively detected using a plate reader. It showed that the nanoparticles were well biotinylated.
Figure 3: Confocal microscopy image showing outer CY5 labeling of the nanoparticles. The size of those nanoparticles is around 200 nm, which corresponds to the previous DLS characterization.

Cell surface expression:

Characterization of an existing part: INP characterization with confocal microscope was successfull, we were able to prove with certainty the export of YFP via INP transport in part Bba_K523013

Expression of streptavidin at the cell surface: Gibson assemblies of the three different streptavidin worked perfectly and sequencing results matched with what expected. The growth curve of transformed E.Coli showed delayed growth, but bacteria still divide with an acceptable rate. The assay with a fluorescent biotin supposed to bind streptavidin gave some positive results (some bacteria appeared flurescent when excited at the corresponding wavelenght) but since the negative control also showed fluorescence, nothing could be proved. However, a western blot anti streptavidin showed bands at the expected size of streptavidin, proving with certainty its expression.

Degrading:

With the exception of MMP9, Gibson assemblies worked fine. The sequencing results showed a STOP after MMP2 and gelE, but there was still a chance for them to be expressed, even whithout GFP. The Western Blot anti-His tag was negative even though His tag was supposed to be before STOP. However, it may be hidden in the protein. An assay to purify the two enzymes MMP2 and gelE showed the presence of the proteins by comparing the assay of arabinose induce (expressing enzymes due to the arabinose induced promoter) and non arabinose induced protein.