Team:UC Davis/Database/Initial Population

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 13: Line 13:
<p>
<p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/2/28/Depot_collaborative_population.png" width=700px height=380><br>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/2/28/Depot_collaborative_population.png" width=700px height=380><br>
-
Teams ZJU-China, UCSF, Stanford-Brown, and Bielefeld-Germany collaborated with our team in an effort to see how our promoter characterization standards worked in practice, while also further characterizing the Anderson Promoter Collection (J23100-J23119). Their collaborative efforts taught new and verified many important facets in making data standards: understanding the strict timetables of teams, communicating in a common vocabulary, and learning what components of the characterization process can be standardized. Most importantly, however, this process showed iGEM-er's eagerness to share.  
+
Teams ZJU-China, UCSF, Stanford-Brown, and Bielefeld-Germany collaborated with our team in an effort to see how our promoter characterization standards worked in practice, while also further characterizing the Anderson Promoter Collection (J23100-J23119). Their collaborative efforts taught new and verified many important facets in making data standards: to communicate in a common vocabulary, to weave in standardization the already strict timetables of teams, and to understand what components of the characterization process can be standardized. Most importantly, however, this process showed iGEM-er's eagerness to share. Check out the results of their collaborative efforts at The Depot.
</p>
</p>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 00:45, 27 September 2013

Initial Population of BBCDD


Teams ZJU-China, UCSF, Stanford-Brown, and Bielefeld-Germany collaborated with our team in an effort to see how our promoter characterization standards worked in practice, while also further characterizing the Anderson Promoter Collection (J23100-J23119). Their collaborative efforts taught new and verified many important facets in making data standards: to communicate in a common vocabulary, to weave in standardization the already strict timetables of teams, and to understand what components of the characterization process can be standardized. Most importantly, however, this process showed iGEM-er's eagerness to share. Check out the results of their collaborative efforts at The Depot.