Team:Tokyo Tech/Experiment/RM-lac Hybrid Promoter Assay

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 72: Line 72:
<h2>
<h2>
<p>
<p>
-
N99 cells (CI+) showed higher fluorescence intensity than JM2.300 cells (CI-). From this experiment, we assume that our <i>rm/lac</i> hybrid promoter is actually activated by CI. We are now confirming that our <i>rm/lac</i> hybrid promoter is not only activated by CI but also repressed by LacI.
+
N99 cells (CI+) showed higher fluorescence intensity than JM2.300 cells (CI-). From this experiment, we assume that our <i>rm/lac</i> hybrid promoter is actually activated by CI. In addition, N99 (IPTG-) showed lower fluorescence than N99 IPTG+). From this result, we can assume that <rm/lac> hybrid promoter was repressed by LacI derived from <i>E. coli</i> genome. We are now confirming that our <i>rm/lac</i> hybrid promoter is not only activated by CI but also repressed by LacI through another assay.
</p>
</p>
</h2>
</h2>

Revision as of 13:50, 27 September 2013


rm/lac Hybrid Promoter Assay

Contents

1. Introduction

In order to achieve the natural plants’ temporal pattern for producing plant hormones in E. coli, we introduced an incoherent feed forward loop, including a new hybrid promoter part ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1139150 BBa_K1139150]). Plants produce their hormones transiently rather than steadily (Takei et al., 2001) (Fig. 3-7-1). Moreover, continuous overexpression of hormones can be harmful to plants (K. Thiman, 1937). Thus, we thought that it should be important to achieve this transient temporal pattern for producing plant hormones in E. coli. By applying the incoherent feed forward loop, the transient pulse of gene expression can be generated (Basu. S et al., 2003, S. Mangan et al., 2006).

Fig. 3-7-1. Temporal pattern hormones expression in plants

The system of our designed incoherent feed forward loop is shown in Fig. 3-7-2. We newly developed rm/lac hybrid promoter, which is activated by CI and repressed by LacI (Fig. 3-7-3). We plan to ligate a hormone synthase part downstream of this hybrid promoter. Our mathematical model (Fig. 3-7-4) shows what the temporal pattern for plant hormone production should achieve (details about this model can be found here). While rm/lac hybrid promoter activation by CI is a single-step reaction, repression by LacI is a two-step reaction. Thus, the activation of rm/lac hybrid promoter is faster than its repression. This time lag between activation and repression is important for generating a temporal pattern of plant hormone production.

Fig. 3-7-4. Our mathematical model for temporal pattern generation

As a first step to achieve this incoherent feed forward loop, we constructed the circuit shown in Fig. 3-7-5 to confirm that our new rm/lac hybrid promoter actually works. We set GFP as a reporter of rm/lac hybrid promoter and introduced the part into E. coli . First, we verified that our rm/lac hybrid promoter is activated by CI with the following assay.

Fig. 3-7-5. The circuit we constructed including the new part


2. Materials and Methods

Fig. 3-7-6. Constructions for our assay

2-1. Construction

-pSB6A1-Ptet-GFP (N99)…positive control

-pSB6A1-promoterless-GFP (N99)…negative control

-pSB6A1-Prm/lac-GFP (N99)…sample with CI*

-pSB6A1--Prm/lac-GFP (JM2.300)…sample without CI

* This N99 expresses CI from its genome constitutively.

2-2. Assay protocol

  1. Prepare overnight culture of each cell at 37°C for 12 hours.
  2. Take 30 microL of the overnight cultures into LB (3 mL) containing antibiotics (Amp 50 microg/mL) and 1 mM of IPTG* (→fresh culture)

    *We added IPTG in order to make sure to repress the expression of LacI derived from E. coli genome.

  3. After 4 hours of induction, flow cytometer measurements for GFP expression.


3. Results

Fig. 3-7-7 shows the fluorescence intensity detected by flow cytometer. Fig. 3-7-8 is the extracted data which shows the comparison of N99 (IPTG+, with constitutive CI) and JM2.300 (IPTG+, without CI).


4. Discussion

N99 cells (CI+) showed higher fluorescence intensity than JM2.300 cells (CI-). From this experiment, we assume that our rm/lac hybrid promoter is actually activated by CI. In addition, N99 (IPTG-) showed lower fluorescence than N99 IPTG+). From this result, we can assume that <rm/lac> hybrid promoter was repressed by LacI derived from E. coli genome. We are now confirming that our rm/lac hybrid promoter is not only activated by CI but also repressed by LacI through another assay.


5. Reference

  1. Kentaro Takei, Hitoshi Sakakibara, Mitsutaka Taniguchi and Tatsuo Sugiyama. (2001) Nitrogen-Dependent Accumulation of Cytokinins in Root and the Translocation to Leaf: Implication of Cytokinin Species that Induces Gene Expression of Maize Response Regulator. Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 85–93
  2. Kenneth V. Thiman. (1937) ON THE NATUJRE OF INHIBITIONS CAUSED BY AUXIN. American Journal of Botany. Vol. 24, No. 7, 407-412
  3. Basu S, Mehreja R, Thiberge S, Chen MT, Weiss R. (2004) Spatiotemporal control of gene expression with pulse-generating networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101, 6355–6360.
  4. S. Mangan, S. Itzkovitz, A. Zaslaver, U. Alon. (2006) The Incoherent Feed-forward Loop Accelerates the Response-time of the gal System of Escherichia coli . J. Mol. Biol. 356, 1073-1081