Team:BYU Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Fallexp/10.8 Characterization of Mutant Phage
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(5 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
* Post-CsCl mutant phage from [[Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Summerexp/9.13_Mutagen_Concentration_Test|9.13 Mutagen Concentration Test]] | * Post-CsCl mutant phage from [[Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Summerexp/9.13_Mutagen_Concentration_Test|9.13 Mutagen Concentration Test]] | ||
- | * Mutant phage S4, S10, and L8 | + | * Mutant phage S4, S10, S21, and L8 |
* x8 top agar | * x8 top agar | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
* Each phage sample was then plated at -7 using x4 agar to verify the mutants' phenotypic stability after propagation. | * Each phage sample was then plated at -7 using x4 agar to verify the mutants' phenotypic stability after propagation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3) TEM (10.16) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Phage Purification Team set up copper grids and arranged for TEM appointments to look at S4, S10 and L8 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4) Sequencing (10.17-10.?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * During the week when we were waiting for the new sequencing primers (BI319 and BI320) to arrive, we where able to isolate a new mutant phage S21. Thus, we will sequence S4, S10, S21, L8, and WT T7 phage to map out mutations altering phage capsid sizes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * DNA isolation, PCR, and gel electrophoresis protocol was similar to that of [[Team:BYU_Provo/Notebook/SmallPhage/Springexp/Period2/Exp/5.20_T7_Minor_Capsid_Protein_PCR| 5.20 T7 Minor Capsid Protein PCR]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | : ''Note for sequencing we used the primers BI257 and BI258.'' | ||
'''V) Results''' | '''V) Results''' | ||
Line 89: | Line 101: | ||
'''VI) Conclusion''' | '''VI) Conclusion''' | ||
+ | * We have taken several EM's of the phage, but have yet to get results for their capsid sizes. We hope to accomplish this before we leave for the jamboree. | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 03:55, 29 October 2013
| ||
|
10.8 Characterization of Mutant Phage
I) Purpose
II) Expected Outcome
III) Reagents Used
IV) Procedure 1) Overview of previous attempts before iGEM Regional Jamboree
2) Propagating Mutant Phage (10.10)
3) TEM (10.16)
4) Sequencing (10.17-10.?)
V) Results 2) Propagating Mutant Phage
VI) Conclusion
|