Team:Tokyo Tech/Experiment/Quantitative Analysis of Cytokinin
From 2013.igem.org
ShuntaSuzuki (Talk | contribs) |
ShuntaSuzuki (Talk | contribs) |
||
(97 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{tokyotechmenudark}} | {{tokyotechmenudark}} | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<div id="text-area"><br> | <div id="text-area"><br> | ||
- | <div class="box" id="Quantitative | + | <div class="box" id="title"> |
- | <h1>Quantitative analysis | + | <p style="line-height:0em; text-indent:0em;" name="top">Quantitative Analysis of Cytokinin</p> |
- | </h1> | + | </div> |
- | <h3>1. Introduction | + | <div class="box"> |
- | </h3> | + | <h1>1. Quantitative analysis for cytokinin <br><div align="right">using cotyledons of cucumber</div></h1> |
+ | <h3>1-1. Introduction</h3> | ||
<h2> | <h2> | ||
- | <p>We performed quantitative analysis | + | <p> |
+ | We performed quantitative analysis for cytokinin using cotyledons (seed sprouts) of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv.). We proposed to make <i>E. coli</i> produce cytokinin and needed to establish experimental system for quantitative analysis for cytokinin. Cucumber cotyledons are frequently used as samples for a simple and rapid bioassay for cytokinin (Fletcher et al., 1971; 1982). Previous works indicated that cytokinin enhanced chlorophyll levels in plant cells. By using cytokinin samples, we attempted to learn methods for bioassay of cucumber cotyledons. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</h2> | </h2> | ||
- | <h3>2. Materials and | + | <h3>1-2. Materials and Methods</h3> |
- | </h3> | + | <h2>[[Image:Titech2013_analysis_Fig_3-6-1.png|180px|thumb|right|Fig. 3-6-1. Samples of cytokinin]] |
- | <h2><OL> | + | </h2> |
+ | <h2> | ||
+ | <OL> | ||
<LI>Cucumber seeds were planted on absorbent cotton dampened with water and germinated in the dark at 27°C for 5 days. | <LI>Cucumber seeds were planted on absorbent cotton dampened with water and germinated in the dark at 27°C for 5 days. | ||
- | <LI>The cotyledons were excised in dim red light. Two cotyledons were from one seed. | + | <LI>The cotyledons were excised in dim red light. Two cotyledons were from one seed. One cotyledon was placed in 3.5 cm plastic dish containing 0.4 mL of 100 µM cytokinin and 0.1% (v/v) of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) solution. The other cotyledon was placed in 3.5 cm plastic dish containing only 0.1% (v/v) of DMSO solution as a negative control. 6 cotyledons were placed together in one dish. |
- | <LI>The dishes were returned to the dark at 27°C for 24 h and then moved under fluorescent light with an intensity of about 40 | + | <LI>The dishes were returned to the dark at 27°C for 24 h and then moved under fluorescent light with an intensity of about 40 µmol /m<sup>2</sup>S<sup>1</sup> (photosynthetic photon flux density). |
- | <LI>After 24 h, the weight of cotyledons was measured per dish. | + | <LI>After 24 h, the weight of cotyledons was measured per dish. |
- | <LI>The 6 cotyledons in the dish were homogenized together and the chlorophyll was extracted in 3 | + | <LI>The 6 cotyledons in the dish were homogenized together and the chlorophyll was extracted in 3 mL 80% (v/v) of cold acetone. The volume was brought up to 5 mL with the acetone. The extract was centrifuged (2,000 rpm, 5 min, 4°C). The absorbances of the supernatant were read at 663.6 and 646.6 nm. Calculations of chlorophyll concentrations were carried out by following the formula shown below (Porra et al., 1989). |
- | <p>Chlorophyll concentration ( | + | <p>Chlorophyll concentration (µg/mL) = 17.76 X A (646.6 nm) + 7.34 X A (663.6 nm) |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | </OL> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | [[Image:Titech2013_analysis_Fig_3-6-2.png|600px|thumb|center|Fig. 3-6-2. Extraction of chlorophyll]] | ||
</h2> | </h2> | ||
- | <h3>3. Results | + | <h3>1-3. Results</h3> |
- | </h3> | + | |
<h2> | <h2> | ||
- | <p>Two pictures of cytokinin-treated cotyledons are shown in | + | <p> |
+ | Two pictures of the cytokinin-treated cotyledons are shown in Fig. 3-6-3. Cytokinin had effects of hypertrophy and greening on the cotyledons. The weight ratio and the chlorophyll concentration ratio are shown in Fig. 3-6-4. Both weight and chlorophyll concentration of the cytokinin-treated cotyledons were higher than those of the non-treated cotyledons. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | [[Image:Titech2013_analysis_Fig_3-6-3.png|600px|thumb|center|Fig. 3-6-3. Pictures of the cotyledons 24 h after the treatment of cytokinin samples.]] | ||
+ | <gallery widths="380px" heights="350" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto; text-align:center;"> | ||
+ | Image:Titech2013_analysis_Fig_3-6-4.png|Fig. 3-6-4. Weight ratio of the cotyledons. | ||
+ | Image:Titech2013_analysis_Fig_3-6-5.png|Fig. 3-6-5. Chlorophyll concentration ratio of the cotyledons. | ||
+ | </gallery> | ||
</h2> | </h2> | ||
- | <h3>4. | + | <h3>1-4. References</h3> |
- | </h3> | + | |
<h2><OL> | <h2><OL> | ||
- | <LI>R. A. Fletcher and | + | <LI>R. A. Fletcher and D. McCullagh. Cytokinin-Induced Chlorophyll Formation in Cucumber Cotyledons. Planta 1971;101:88-90 |
- | <LI>R. A. Fletcher, V. Kallidumbil and P. Steele. An Improved Bioassay for | + | <LI>R. A. Fletcher, V. Kallidumbil and P. Steele. An Improved Bioassay for Cytokinin Using Cucumber Cotyledons. Plant Physiol 1982;69:675-677 |
- | <LI>R.J. Porra, W.A. Thompson and P.E. Kridemann. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a | + | <LI>R. J. Porra, W. A. Thompson and P. E. Kridemann. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a |
and b extracted with four different solvents : verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1989;975:384-394 | and b extracted with four different solvents : verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1989;975:384-394 | ||
- | </OL></h2> | + | </OL> |
+ | </h2> | ||
</div><br> | </div><br> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="box"> | <div class="box"> | ||
- | <h1>Identification of | + | <h1>2. Identification of cytokinin <br><div align="right">by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)</div></h1> |
- | </ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | </ | + | |
<h2> | <h2> | ||
- | + | [[Image:Titech2013_analysis_Fig_3-6-6.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig. 3-6-6. iP : 6-(γ, γ-Dimethylallylamino) purine and tZ : trans-zeatin]]</h2> | |
+ | <h3>2-1. Introduction</h3> | ||
+ | <h2><p> | ||
+ | In order to confirm that our <i>E. coli</i> synthesizes cytokinin (especially iP : 6-(γ, γ-Dimethylallylamino) purine, tZ : trans-zeatin), we planned to use ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). We aimed to make <i>E. coli</i> produce iP and tZ by introducing <i>At</i>IPT4 or <i>At</i>IPT7 into <i>E. coli</i>. Before attempting the cytokinin biosynthesis in <i>E. coli</i>, we determined the retention times of authentic samples of iP and tZ. Then we confirmed that iP and tZ were able to be detected from the mixture of <i>E. coli</i> culture medium and the cytokinin solution. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</h2> | </h2> | ||
- | <h3>2. | + | <h3>2-2. Methods</h3> |
- | </h3> | + | |
<h2> | <h2> | ||
- | <p>UPLC was carried out as described by Novák et al. (2008) | + | <em> |
- | </p> | + | Determination of retention times of iP and tZ |
+ | </em> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <h2> | ||
+ | <p>UPLC was carried out as described by Novák et al. (2008) [1]. Samples (5 µM) were prepared by diluting each cytokinin DMSO solution with a mobile phase (initial conditions). 5 µL of each sample was injected onto a reversed phase column (BEH C18, 2.1 X 100 mm, 1.7 microm; Waters). The samples were eluted with an 8 min. linear gradient of 90:10 = A:B to 50:50 = A:B (v/v) where A was 15 mM ammonium formate and B was methanol at a flow rate of 0.25 mL / min. The column temperature was set to 40°C. At the end of the gradient, the column was washed with 100% B for 1 min. and equilibrated to initial conditions for 3 min. Under these conditions, the retention times for the monitored compounds ranged from 2.5 to 7.5 min. The effluent was passed through an ultraviolet detector at 268 nm. | ||
+ | </p></h2> | ||
+ | <h2> | ||
+ | <em> | ||
+ | Detection of iP and tZ from the mixture of the <i>E. coli</i> culture medium and the cytokinin solution | ||
+ | </em> | ||
</h2> | </h2> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
<h2> | <h2> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | + | Cultures were made as described by Takei et al. (2001) [2]. <i>E. coli</i> (JM109) transformed with pSB6A1-Promoterless-<i>atipt7</i> were grown in M9 minimal medium, which is supplemented with 20 mg/mL ampicillin, 1 M sorbitol, 1% (w/v) casamino acid, 2% (w/v) sucrose, 2.5 mM betaine, 5 mg/mLthiamine, 1 mM MgSO<sub>4</sub>, and 0.1 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub>. The cultures were incubated at 25°C with shaking until those OD600 reached 0.5. The cells were harvested by centrifugation. The mixture of the supernatant and the cytokinin solution were prepared and used for UPLC. | |
- | </p> | + | </p></h2> |
+ | <h3>2-3. Results</h3> | ||
+ | <h2> | ||
+ | <em> | ||
+ | Determination of retention times of iP and tZ | ||
+ | </em> | ||
</h2> | </h2> | ||
- | <h3>4. | + | <h2> |
- | </h3> | + | <p> |
+ | The peak of tZ standard was detected at 5.0 min. The peak of iP standard was detected at 9.1 min. These results are shown in Fig. 3-6-7. | ||
+ | [[Image:Titech2013_analysis_Fig_3-6-7.png|600px|thumb|center|Fig. 3-6-7. The retension times of iP and tZ standards determined by UPLC]] | ||
+ | </P></h2> | ||
+ | <h2> | ||
+ | <em> | ||
+ | Detection of iP and tZ from the mixture of the <i>E. coli</i> culture medium and the cytokinin solution | ||
+ | </em> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
+ | <h2> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The black line stands for the chromatogram of the diluted supernatant. The red line stands for the chromatogram of the diluted supernatant containing 1 µM cytokinin standards. Results are shown in Fig. 3-6-8. | ||
+ | [[Image:Titech2013_farming_cytokinin_sample_in_caltured_medium.jpg|600px|thumb|center|Fig. 3-6-8. The UPLC chromatograms. The black line stands for the chromatogram of the diluted supernatant. The red line stands for the chromatogram of the diluted supernatant containing 1 µM cytokinin standards.]] | ||
+ | This result suggests that using UPLC, iP and tZ were detected from the mixture of <i>E. coli</i> culture medium and the cytokinin solution. We believe that the method is able to be applied to confirming the biosynthesis of iP and tZ in <i>E. coli</i>. | ||
+ | </p></h2> | ||
+ | <h3>2-4. References</h3> | ||
<h2><OL> | <h2><OL> | ||
- | <LI> | + | <LI>O. Novák, E. Hauserová, P. Amakorová, K. Doležal, M. Strnad. (2008) Cytokinin profiling in plant tissues using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry, 69, 2214–2224 |
- | </OL></h2> | + | <LI>K. Takei, H. Sakakibara, and T. Sugiyama. (2001) Identification of Genes Encoding Adenylate Isopentenyltransferase, a Cytokinin Biosynthesis Enzyme, in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276, 26405-26410 |
+ | </OL> | ||
+ | </h2> | ||
</div><br> | </div><br> | ||
- | + | <html><div align="center"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Experiment/Quantitative_Analysis_of_Cytokinin#top"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/f0/Titeh2013_backtotop.png" width="200px"></a></div></html> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | |||
- |
Latest revision as of 03:00, 29 October 2013
Quantitative Analysis of Cytokinin
Contents |
1. Quantitative analysis for cytokinin
using cotyledons of cucumber
1-1. Introduction
We performed quantitative analysis for cytokinin using cotyledons (seed sprouts) of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv.). We proposed to make E. coli produce cytokinin and needed to establish experimental system for quantitative analysis for cytokinin. Cucumber cotyledons are frequently used as samples for a simple and rapid bioassay for cytokinin (Fletcher et al., 1971; 1982). Previous works indicated that cytokinin enhanced chlorophyll levels in plant cells. By using cytokinin samples, we attempted to learn methods for bioassay of cucumber cotyledons.
1-2. Materials and Methods
- Cucumber seeds were planted on absorbent cotton dampened with water and germinated in the dark at 27°C for 5 days.
- The cotyledons were excised in dim red light. Two cotyledons were from one seed. One cotyledon was placed in 3.5 cm plastic dish containing 0.4 mL of 100 µM cytokinin and 0.1% (v/v) of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) solution. The other cotyledon was placed in 3.5 cm plastic dish containing only 0.1% (v/v) of DMSO solution as a negative control. 6 cotyledons were placed together in one dish.
- The dishes were returned to the dark at 27°C for 24 h and then moved under fluorescent light with an intensity of about 40 µmol /m2S1 (photosynthetic photon flux density).
- After 24 h, the weight of cotyledons was measured per dish.
- The 6 cotyledons in the dish were homogenized together and the chlorophyll was extracted in 3 mL 80% (v/v) of cold acetone. The volume was brought up to 5 mL with the acetone. The extract was centrifuged (2,000 rpm, 5 min, 4°C). The absorbances of the supernatant were read at 663.6 and 646.6 nm. Calculations of chlorophyll concentrations were carried out by following the formula shown below (Porra et al., 1989).
Chlorophyll concentration (µg/mL) = 17.76 X A (646.6 nm) + 7.34 X A (663.6 nm)
Chlorophyll concentration (µg/mL) = 17.76 X A (646.6 nm) + 7.34 X A (663.6 nm)
1-3. Results
Two pictures of the cytokinin-treated cotyledons are shown in Fig. 3-6-3. Cytokinin had effects of hypertrophy and greening on the cotyledons. The weight ratio and the chlorophyll concentration ratio are shown in Fig. 3-6-4. Both weight and chlorophyll concentration of the cytokinin-treated cotyledons were higher than those of the non-treated cotyledons.
1-4. References
- R. A. Fletcher and D. McCullagh. Cytokinin-Induced Chlorophyll Formation in Cucumber Cotyledons. Planta 1971;101:88-90
- R. A. Fletcher, V. Kallidumbil and P. Steele. An Improved Bioassay for Cytokinin Using Cucumber Cotyledons. Plant Physiol 1982;69:675-677
- R. J. Porra, W. A. Thompson and P. E. Kridemann. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a
and b extracted with four different solvents : verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1989;975:384-394
2. Identification of cytokinin
by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)
2-1. Introduction
In order to confirm that our E. coli synthesizes cytokinin (especially iP : 6-(γ, γ-Dimethylallylamino) purine, tZ : trans-zeatin), we planned to use ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). We aimed to make E. coli produce iP and tZ by introducing AtIPT4 or AtIPT7 into E. coli. Before attempting the cytokinin biosynthesis in E. coli, we determined the retention times of authentic samples of iP and tZ. Then we confirmed that iP and tZ were able to be detected from the mixture of E. coli culture medium and the cytokinin solution.
2-2. Methods
Determination of retention times of iP and tZ
UPLC was carried out as described by Novák et al. (2008) [1]. Samples (5 µM) were prepared by diluting each cytokinin DMSO solution with a mobile phase (initial conditions). 5 µL of each sample was injected onto a reversed phase column (BEH C18, 2.1 X 100 mm, 1.7 microm; Waters). The samples were eluted with an 8 min. linear gradient of 90:10 = A:B to 50:50 = A:B (v/v) where A was 15 mM ammonium formate and B was methanol at a flow rate of 0.25 mL / min. The column temperature was set to 40°C. At the end of the gradient, the column was washed with 100% B for 1 min. and equilibrated to initial conditions for 3 min. Under these conditions, the retention times for the monitored compounds ranged from 2.5 to 7.5 min. The effluent was passed through an ultraviolet detector at 268 nm.
Detection of iP and tZ from the mixture of the E. coli culture medium and the cytokinin solution
Cultures were made as described by Takei et al. (2001) [2]. E. coli (JM109) transformed with pSB6A1-Promoterless-atipt7 were grown in M9 minimal medium, which is supplemented with 20 mg/mL ampicillin, 1 M sorbitol, 1% (w/v) casamino acid, 2% (w/v) sucrose, 2.5 mM betaine, 5 mg/mLthiamine, 1 mM MgSO4, and 0.1 mM CaCl2. The cultures were incubated at 25°C with shaking until those OD600 reached 0.5. The cells were harvested by centrifugation. The mixture of the supernatant and the cytokinin solution were prepared and used for UPLC.
2-3. Results
Determination of retention times of iP and tZ
The peak of tZ standard was detected at 5.0 min. The peak of iP standard was detected at 9.1 min. These results are shown in Fig. 3-6-7.
Detection of iP and tZ from the mixture of the E. coli culture medium and the cytokinin solution
The black line stands for the chromatogram of the diluted supernatant. The red line stands for the chromatogram of the diluted supernatant containing 1 µM cytokinin standards. Results are shown in Fig. 3-6-8.
This result suggests that using UPLC, iP and tZ were detected from the mixture of E. coli culture medium and the cytokinin solution. We believe that the method is able to be applied to confirming the biosynthesis of iP and tZ in E. coli.