"
Team:CSU Fort Collins/Parts
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| (6 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| - | |||
| - | < | + | <h1> Parts Submitted to the Registry</h1> |
| - | + | ||
| - | < | + | <p>Our plan was to design our bio-bricks using Gibson Assembly and gBlocks. However, we were unable to get the Gibson Assemblies to work and we were unable to produce our parts. One big hurdle in designing our parts was that some of the sequences for the proteins we wanted to use had several restriction enzyme sites that were not compatible with the bio-brick standards. This is why we chose Gibson Assembly over using Standard Assembly. |
| + | It was suggested by staff members at the iGEM headquarters that we prompt forthcoming iGEM teams of the potential risks of relying on Gibson Assembly alone. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
</html> | </html> | ||
{{CSU_Template_1_bottom}} | {{CSU_Template_1_bottom}} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:38, 28 September 2013
|
|
Parts Submitted to the Registry
Our plan was to design our bio-bricks using Gibson Assembly and gBlocks. However, we were unable to get the Gibson Assemblies to work and we were unable to produce our parts. One big hurdle in designing our parts was that some of the sequences for the proteins we wanted to use had several restriction enzyme sites that were not compatible with the bio-brick standards. This is why we chose Gibson Assembly over using Standard Assembly. It was suggested by staff members at the iGEM headquarters that we prompt forthcoming iGEM teams of the potential risks of relying on Gibson Assembly alone.
