Team:Peking/HumanPractice/Questionnaire

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(39 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 152: Line 152:
#DataPage_Sublist{position:relative; top:0px; left:-60px;}
#DataPage_Sublist{position:relative; top:0px; left:-60px;}
#Safety_Sublist{position:relative; top:0px; left:-180px;}
#Safety_Sublist{position:relative; top:0px; left:-180px;}
-
#HumanPractice_Sublist{position:relative; top:0px; left:-420px;}
+
#HumanPractice_Sublist{position:relative; top:0px; left:-470px;}
#iGEM_logo{position:absolute; top:30px; left:1090px; height:80px;}
#iGEM_logo{position:absolute; top:30px; left:1090px; height:80px;}
Line 164: Line 164:
#LeftNavigation{position:fixed; top:130px; float:left; width:200px; height:100%; background-color:#313131; z-index:900;}
#LeftNavigation{position:fixed; top:130px; float:left; width:200px; height:100%; background-color:#313131; z-index:900;}
-
#HumanPracticeListTitle{position:absolute; top:50px; left:20px; color:#ffffff; font-size:26px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; text-decoration:none; border-bottom:0px;}
+
#HumanPracticeListTitle{position:absolute; top:50px; left:15px; color:#ffffff; font-size:23px; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; text-decoration:none; border-bottom:0px;}
#HumanPracticeListTitle:hover>a{color:#999999;}
#HumanPracticeListTitle:hover>a{color:#999999;}
#HumanPracticeListTitle a {color:#ffffff; text-decoration:none;}
#HumanPracticeListTitle a {color:#ffffff; text-decoration:none;}
-
#HumanPracticeList{position:absolute; top:110px; left:10px; color:#ffffff; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;}
+
#HumanPracticeList{position:absolute; top:110px; left:0px; color:#ffffff; font-family: calibri, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;}
#HumanPracticeList > li {display:block; list-style-type:none; width:180px; height:25px; font-size:18px; text-align:left; background-color:transparent;}
#HumanPracticeList > li {display:block; list-style-type:none; width:180px; height:25px; font-size:18px; text-align:left; background-color:transparent;}
.SensorsListItem>a {color:#ffffff; text-decoration:none;}
.SensorsListItem>a {color:#ffffff; text-decoration:none;}
Line 177: Line 177:
-
#SensorEditingArea{position:absolute; left:200px; top:360px; height:5000px; width:1000px; background-color:#ffffff;}
+
#SensorEditingArea{position:absolute; left:200px; top:360px; height:5050px; width:1000px; background-color:#ffffff;}
Line 207: Line 207:
-
#FigurePic1{position:absolute; left:250px; width:500px; top:1160px}
+
#FigurePic1{position:absolute; left:250px; width:500px; top:1180px}
-
#FigurePic2{position:absolute; left:340px; height:295px; top:2010px}
+
#FigurePic2{position:absolute; left:340px; height:295px; top:2030px}
#FigurePic3{position:absolute; left:340px; height:295px; top:2480px}
#FigurePic3{position:absolute; left:340px; height:295px; top:2480px}
#FigurePic4{position:absolute; left:340px; height:295px; top:2942px}
#FigurePic4{position:absolute; left:340px; height:295px; top:2942px}
Line 235: Line 235:
<ul id="navigationbar">
<ul id="navigationbar">
<li id="PKU_navbar_Home" class="Navbar_Item">
<li id="PKU_navbar_Home" class="Navbar_Item">
 +
                       
<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking">Home</a>
<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking">Home</a>
<ul id="Home_Sublist" >
<ul id="Home_Sublist" >
Line 240: Line 241:
</li>
</li>
<li id="PKU_navbar_Team" class="Navbar_Item">
<li id="PKU_navbar_Team" class="Navbar_Item">
-
<a >Team</a>
+
<a href="">Team</a>
<ul id="Team_Sublist">
<ul id="Team_Sublist">
 +
                                <div class="BackgroundofSublist"></div>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Team/Members">Members</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Team/Members">Members</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Team/Notebook">Notebook</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Team/Notebook">Notebook</a></li>
Line 250: Line 252:
<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project">Project</a>
<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project">Project</a>
<ul id="Project_Sublist">
<ul id="Project_Sublist">
 +
                                <div class="BackgroundofSublist"></div>
                                 <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/SensorMining">Biosensor Mining</a></li>
                                 <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/SensorMining">Biosensor Mining</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/BioSensors">Biosensors</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/BioSensors">Biosensors</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/Plugins">Adaptors</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/Plugins">Adaptors</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/BandpassFilter">Band-pass Filter</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/BandpassFilter">Band-pass Filter</a></li>
 +
                                <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Project/Devices">Devices</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
</li>
</li>
<li id="PKU_navbar_Model" class="Navbar_Item">
<li id="PKU_navbar_Model" class="Navbar_Item">
-
<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Model">Model</a>
+
<a href="">Model</a>
<ul id="Model_Sublist">
<ul id="Model_Sublist">
 +
                                <div class="BackgroundofSublist"></div>
 +
                                <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/Model">Band-pass Filter</a></li>
 +
                                <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/ModelforFinetuning">Biosensor Fine-tuning</a></li>
</ul>
</ul>
</li>
</li>
                         <li id="PKU_navbar_HumanPractice" class="Navbar_Item" style="width:90px">
                         <li id="PKU_navbar_HumanPractice" class="Navbar_Item" style="width:90px">
-
<a >Data page</a>
+
<a href="">Data page</a>
-
<ul id="DataPage_Sublist">
+
<ul id="DataPage_Sublist">
 +
                                <div class="BackgroundofSublist"></div>
                                 <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/DataPage/Parts">Parts</a></li>
                                 <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/DataPage/Parts">Parts</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/DataPage/JudgingCriteria">Judging Criteria</a></li>
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/DataPage/JudgingCriteria">Judging Criteria</a></li>
Line 276: Line 284:
<li id="PKU_navbar_HumanPractice" class="Navbar_Item" style="width:120px">
<li id="PKU_navbar_HumanPractice" class="Navbar_Item" style="width:120px">
<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice">Human Practice</a>
<a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice">Human Practice</a>
-
<ul id="HumanPractice_Sublist">
+
<ul id="HumanPractice_Sublist">
-
                                 <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/Questionnaire">Questionnaire</a></li>
+
                                <div class="BackgroundofSublist"></div>
-
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/FactoryVisit">Factory Visit</a></li>
+
                                 <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/Questionnaire">Questionnaire Survey</a></li>
-
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/ModeliGEM">Practical Analysis</a></li>
+
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/FactoryVisit">Visit and Interview</a></li>
-
                                <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/iGEMWorkshop">Team Communication</a></li>
+
                                <li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/ModeliGEM">Practical Analysis</a></li>
 +
<li><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/iGEMWorkshop">Team Communication</a></li>
 +
 
</ul>
</ul>
</li>
</li>
</ul>
</ul>
-
         <a href="https://igem.org/Team_Wikis?year=2013"><img id="iGEM_logo" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/4/48/Peking_igemlogo.jpg"/></a>
+
         <a href="https://2013.igem.org/Main_Page"><img id="iGEM_logo" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/4/48/Peking_igemlogo.jpg"/></a>
</div>
</div>
<!--end navigationbar-->
<!--end navigationbar-->
Line 292: Line 302:
<div id="MajorBody">   
<div id="MajorBody">   
<div id="ProjectTitle">
<div id="ProjectTitle">
-
<h1 id="ProjectName">Questionnaire</h1>
+
<h1 id="ProjectName">Questionnaire Survey</h1>
                 <h1 id="ProjectSubname"></h1>
                 <h1 id="ProjectSubname"></h1>
                 <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/6/66/Peking2013_Ques_back.jpg"/>
                 <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/6/66/Peking2013_Ques_back.jpg"/>
Line 300: Line 310:
                 <h1 id="HumanPracticeListTitle"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice">Human Practice</a></h1>
                 <h1 id="HumanPracticeListTitle"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice">Human Practice</a></h1>
                 <ul id="HumanPracticeList">
                 <ul id="HumanPracticeList">
-
                     <li class="SensorsListItem"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/Questionnaire">Questionnaire</a><li>
+
                     <li class="SensorsListItem"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/Questionnaire">Questionnaire Survey</a><li>
-
                     <li class="SensorsListItem"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/FactoryVisit">Factory Visit</a><li>
+
                     <li class="SensorsListItem"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/FactoryVisit">Visit and Interview</a><li>
                     <li class="SensorsListItem"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/ModeliGEM">Practical Analysis</a><li>
                     <li class="SensorsListItem"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/ModeliGEM">Practical Analysis</a><li>
                     <li class="SensorsListItem"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/iGEMWorkshop">Team Communication</a><li>
                     <li class="SensorsListItem"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Peking/HumanPractice/iGEMWorkshop">Team Communication</a><li>
Line 331: Line 341:
<p id="Content1">
<p id="Content1">
 +
<b><i>The Peking iGEM team has conducted a questionnaire survey to gather the information of public awareness of aromatic pollution and its detection as well as the public attitude to the biological prevention.</i></b>
 +
<br/><br/>
 +
 +
<b>The Questionnaire</b><br/>
<B>1 What are Aromatic Compounds?</B><br/>
<B>1 What are Aromatic Compounds?</B><br/>
-
A. fragrant compounds  <br/>
+
A. Fragrant compounds  <br/>
-
B. benzene series compounds  <br/>
+
B. Benzene series compounds  <br/>
-
C. compounds with heavy metal ion <br/>   
+
C. Compounds with heavy metal ion <br/>   
-
D. halogenic compounds<br/>
+
D. Halogenic compounds<br/>
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/>
<B>2 Which of the following is the LEAST likely source of aromatic pollution?</B><br/>
<B>2 Which of the following is the LEAST likely source of aromatic pollution?</B><br/>
-
A. petroleum refining  <br/>
+
A. Petroleum refining  <br/>
-
B. furniture <br/>
+
B. Furniture <br/>
-
C. printworks <br/>
+
C. Printworks <br/>
-
D. perfume<br/>
+
D. Perfume<br/>
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/>
-
<B>3 Which of the following is aromatic pollution most likely to be found in daily life?</B><br/>
+
<B>3 Which of the following is most likely to consist of aromatic pollutants?</B><br/>
A. PM2.5  <br/>
A. PM2.5  <br/>
-
B. water sample from WEIMING Lake  <br/>
+
B. Water sample from WEIMING Lake  <br/>
-
C. paint <br/>
+
C. Paint <br/>
-
D. newspaper<br/>
+
D. Newspaper<br/>
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/>
-
<B>4 Which method is most commonly used in detecting aromatic compounds?</B><br/>
+
<B>4 Which method is most commonly used in aromatic compound detection?</B><br/>
-
A. mass spectrometer<br/>
+
A. Mass spectrometer<br/>
-
B. gas chromatography<br/>
+
B. Gas chromatography<br/>
-
C. biosensor<br/>
+
C. Biosensor<br/>
-
D. smelling<br/>
+
D. Smelling<br/>
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/>
-
<B>5 Do you pay attention to the progress in science and technology and policy formulation of aromatic compounds?</B><br/>
+
<B>5 Are you concerned about the aromatic pollution in China?</B><br/>
A. Yes<br/>
A. Yes<br/>
-
B. only concerned about pollution from indoor decoration<br/>
+
B. Only concerned about pollution from indoor decoration<br/>
-
C. only heard of PX project<br/>
+
C. Only heard of PX(p-Xylene) project<br/>
-
D. not at all<br/>
+
D. Not at all<br/>
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/>
<B>6 What do you think of biological prevention?</B><br/>
<B>6 What do you think of biological prevention?</B><br/>
Line 371: Line 385:
<p id="Content2">
<p id="Content2">
<B>Here are the analyses of the statistics.</B><br/>
<B>Here are the analyses of the statistics.</B><br/>
-
The questionnaire we designed is mainly about the definition, source, existence, detection methods of aromatic compounds and the public’s knowledge of it. The sample population is mainly made up of 100 visitors from Beijing, so their ages and the degree of education resembles the average level of the nation in a certain degree.  
+
The questionnaire we designed is mainly about the definition, source and detection methods of aromatic pollutants as well as the public attitude to it. The sample population is mainly made up of 100 visitors in Beijing from various classes which could roughly represent the public attitude in China.  
</p>
</p>
<p id="Content3">
<p id="Content3">
<B>Question 1</B><br/>
<B>Question 1</B><br/>
-
This question is about the definition of aromatic compounds. More than half of the sample population gave the correct answer, which is B.benzene series compounds. Still, one third chose the typical wrong answer, A.fragrant compounds. The most likely explanation was that AROMATIC literally means FRAGRANT in Chinese. This result shows that actually many people know little about aromatic compounds.
+
This question is about the definition of aromatic compounds. More than half of the sample population gave the correct answer, B.Benzene series compounds. Still, one third chose the typical wrong answer, A.Fragrant compounds. The most likely explanation was that AROMATIC literally means FRAGRANT in Chinese. This result shows that many people know little about aromatic compounds.
   
   
Line 383: Line 397:
<p id="Content4">
<p id="Content4">
<B>Question 2</B><br/>
<B>Question 2</B><br/>
-
  This one is about the source of aromatic compounds. As we can see in Q1, many people consider aromatic compounds as fragrant compounds. Thus, D.perfume production becomes the most distracting option. One quarter of them chose A.petroleum refining, which is actually the most common source of aromatic pollution. This shows the public’s ignorance of aromatic compounds.  
+
  This question is about the source of aromatic pollutants. As we can see in Q1, many people consider aromatic compounds as fragrant compounds. Thus, D.Perfume production becomes the most distracting option. One quarter of them chose the right answer, A.Petroleum refining.  
</p>
</p>
<p id="Content5">
<p id="Content5">
<B>Question 3</B><br/>
<B>Question 3</B><br/>
-
The third one is about aromatic compounds in daily life. Most people chose C.paint , which is the correct answer. Paint releases pungent odor. It’s not so hard to notice.<br/>
+
The third question is about aromatic pollutants in daily life. The reason why most people chose the correct answer, C.Paint, might be the noticeable smell of paint.<br/>
-
PM2.5 refers to particles whose diameters smaller than 2.5 micrometers. Since the beginning of 2013, it has come to attract attention around the country. PM2.5 represents air pollution in the public's eyes. However, the degree of PM2.5 scarcely has anything to do with aromatic pollution. The inaccurate idea that PM2.5 means any kinds of air pollution needs to be corrected.  
+
A.PM2.5 refers to particles in air pollution whose diameters are smaller than 2.5 micrometers. Since the beginning of 2013, it has become a public concern in China. However, the degree of PM2.5 has little to do with aromatic pollution. The inaccurate idea of PM2.5 needs to be corrected.  
</p>
</p>
<p id="Content6">
<p id="Content6">
<B>Question 4</B><br/>
<B>Question 4</B><br/>
-
This question can’t be taken as a common sense,there it is not easy for an average person to answer. The most common detection methods are GC/MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) and SERS (surface-enhanced raman spectrometry). GC/MS involves both gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, which means option A and B can both be considered as correct answers. It appears that most people know biosensor is not a common method in aromatic compounds detection. It shows that our work, A Comprehensive Biosensor Toolkit to Profile Aromatics in the Environment, is quite promising.  
+
The answer of this question can’t be taken as a common sense. The most common detection methods are GC/MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) and SERS (surface-enhanced raman spectrometry). GC/MS involves both gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, which means option A and B can both be considered as correct answers. It appears that most people know biosensor is not a common method in aromatic compounds detection. So it is necessary to popularize the idea of biosensors.
</p>
</p>
Line 400: Line 414:
<p id="Content7">
<p id="Content7">
<B>Question 5</B><br/>
<B>Question 5</B><br/>
-
The fifth and sixth questions are both subjective. More than half of the people are concerned about aromatic pollution to some extent. We believe that these pollutions will draw more and more of the public’s attention in the future.  
+
More than half of the people are concerned about aromatic pollution to some extent. Therefore biosensors that provide a quick and convenient detection are very promising.
</p>
</p>
<p id="Content8">
<p id="Content8">
<B>Question 6</B><br/>
<B>Question 6</B><br/>
-
Most people think biological prevention is acceptable and are even totally for it. Meanwhile, biological prevention and the monitoring of aromatic compounds are what we’ve been working on. This indicates that people are optimistic about that.  
+
Most people think biological prevention is acceptable and some even totally for it. But still 15% percent are not assured and even 9% totally against it, which means synthetic biology need to assure the public of its safety.
</br></br>
</br></br>
-
The results of this survey shows that the majority of the public has common sense when it comes to aromatic pollution. However, people still lack knowledge about methods of its production and pollution. In the past decade, there was a debate on the PX(p-Xylene) project in China. Hundreds of people took to the streets in Kunming, Xiamen and other cities to protest the project, firmly believing that the production of PX would cause great damage to the environment. With stricter regulation by the government and an increasing knowledge of aromatic pollution amongst the public, we believe PX project can exist in harmony with local residents. Hence, it is of utmost importance to expand public knowledge on aromatic pollution.
+
Environmental pollution is now a serious problem in China, and aromatic pollution has drawn more and more public attention year by year. Since 2007, numbers of protests against PX(para-Xylene) industry were held by citizens in many cities including Dalian, Kunming, Ningbo and Xinmen. However, according to our questionnaire survey, despite the public care much about the pollution, many people still lack the basic knowledge of aromatic pollution, for example the definition, the source and the detection method of aromatic pollutants. <br/><br/>Biosensors that provide a quick and convenient detection are promising tools to meet the public requirement and they are accepted by many people. But synthetic biologists still need to further ensure the public the safety and feasibility of biosensors.
 +
 
</p>
</p>

Latest revision as of 18:20, 28 October 2013

Questionnaire Survey

The Peking iGEM team has conducted a questionnaire survey to gather the information of public awareness of aromatic pollution and its detection as well as the public attitude to the biological prevention.

The Questionnaire
1 What are Aromatic Compounds?
A. Fragrant compounds
B. Benzene series compounds
C. Compounds with heavy metal ion
D. Halogenic compounds


2 Which of the following is the LEAST likely source of aromatic pollution?
A. Petroleum refining
B. Furniture
C. Printworks
D. Perfume


3 Which of the following is most likely to consist of aromatic pollutants?
A. PM2.5
B. Water sample from WEIMING Lake
C. Paint
D. Newspaper


4 Which method is most commonly used in aromatic compound detection?
A. Mass spectrometer
B. Gas chromatography
C. Biosensor
D. Smelling


5 Are you concerned about the aromatic pollution in China?
A. Yes
B. Only concerned about pollution from indoor decoration
C. Only heard of PX(p-Xylene) project
D. Not at all


6 What do you think of biological prevention?
A. Totally for it
B. Totally against it
C. Acceptable
D. No idea

Here are the analyses of the statistics.
The questionnaire we designed is mainly about the definition, source and detection methods of aromatic pollutants as well as the public attitude to it. The sample population is mainly made up of 100 visitors in Beijing from various classes which could roughly represent the public attitude in China.

Question 1
This question is about the definition of aromatic compounds. More than half of the sample population gave the correct answer, B.Benzene series compounds. Still, one third chose the typical wrong answer, A.Fragrant compounds. The most likely explanation was that AROMATIC literally means FRAGRANT in Chinese. This result shows that many people know little about aromatic compounds.

Question 2
This question is about the source of aromatic pollutants. As we can see in Q1, many people consider aromatic compounds as fragrant compounds. Thus, D.Perfume production becomes the most distracting option. One quarter of them chose the right answer, A.Petroleum refining.

Question 3
The third question is about aromatic pollutants in daily life. The reason why most people chose the correct answer, C.Paint, might be the noticeable smell of paint.
A.PM2.5 refers to particles in air pollution whose diameters are smaller than 2.5 micrometers. Since the beginning of 2013, it has become a public concern in China. However, the degree of PM2.5 has little to do with aromatic pollution. The inaccurate idea of PM2.5 needs to be corrected.

Question 4
The answer of this question can’t be taken as a common sense. The most common detection methods are GC/MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) and SERS (surface-enhanced raman spectrometry). GC/MS involves both gas chromatography and mass spectrometry, which means option A and B can both be considered as correct answers. It appears that most people know biosensor is not a common method in aromatic compounds detection. So it is necessary to popularize the idea of biosensors.

Question 5
More than half of the people are concerned about aromatic pollution to some extent. Therefore biosensors that provide a quick and convenient detection are very promising.

Question 6
Most people think biological prevention is acceptable and some even totally for it. But still 15% percent are not assured and even 9% totally against it, which means synthetic biology need to assure the public of its safety.

Environmental pollution is now a serious problem in China, and aromatic pollution has drawn more and more public attention year by year. Since 2007, numbers of protests against PX(para-Xylene) industry were held by citizens in many cities including Dalian, Kunming, Ningbo and Xinmen. However, according to our questionnaire survey, despite the public care much about the pollution, many people still lack the basic knowledge of aromatic pollution, for example the definition, the source and the detection method of aromatic pollutants.

Biosensors that provide a quick and convenient detection are promising tools to meet the public requirement and they are accepted by many people. But synthetic biologists still need to further ensure the public the safety and feasibility of biosensors.