Developing our Technology

We are pioneering a live-cell Field-Ready Electrochemical Detection system for toxins present in our environment. Initially, we are focusing on detecting general toxins in oil sands environments, however the immense flexibility our system provides significant opportunities to expand into sensors for almost any compound of interest. With a quick and robust output, our technology offers many advantages over existing biosensor technologies.

Overview

In response to the need for rapid and more on-site technologies to monitor toxins in the oil and gas sector, FREDsense is pioneering a novel biosensor technology. Our first generation product is designed to detect a variety of oil and gas related contaminants in water samples. The system will be more rapid and more portable than current analytical technologies.

Our Product

Our first generation product is a biosensor for general toxicity in a water sample. It senses a variety of toxic chemicals that the bacteria responds to. These include examples such as naphthenic acids (highly corrosive), sulphur-containing compounds (such as those that cause acid rain) and nitrogen-containing compounds. Our sensor reports the overall toxicity and whether or not it reaches a critical threshold. Our major goal is to make it easier and faster to inform people and companies as to the toxicity of their water.

Future Generation Products

Future generation products will include measurement sensors for specific toxic compounds such as naphthenic acids and hydrocarbons. These sensors will report to the user on the type and amount of that compound present.

Product Design

The technology contains two components: disposable cartridges that will hold the sample and “sensing” bacteria, and the detector (Figure 1). The cartridges will contain microorganisms designed to demonstrate detection of toxins by producing enzymes capable of changing analyte compounds so that they can be detected electrochemically (Figure 2). The detector device contains all of the circuitry necessary to read the electrochemical output from the bacterial strain and transmit it to a computer.

Figure 1: Overview of our technology

Data can be collected through a variety of inputs whether direct connections on site (USB) or wirelessly through cellular and existing data networks on-site. Additionally, measurements can be linked to specific geospatial positions using GPS technology. Bringing it all together we envision our system integrating within current data management systems already in use in the oil sands in addition to providing our own cloud computing based system.

To date, we have generated a microbial strain that is able to detect three relevant oil sands toxins: naphthenic acids, carbazole, and dibenzothiophene. We are marketing this as a biosensor for general toxicity. We have demonstrated the output of the detector as being able to alter analyte compounds so that they may be detected electrochemically. Furthermore we are working to demonstrate that we can detect simultaneously active output signals, where more than one compound can be detected at a time. We currently have a proof-of-concept technology for detecting oil sands toxins.

As we are refining the techniques to optimally detect toxins with the microbial strain, we are developing a prototype of the system that will be sold commercially and will ultimately be used by clients for field tests. On this front we are working closely with manufacturers to design our final product.

Detailed Description of the Technology

Sensing Microorganism:

To obtain an organism that may respond to petroleum toxins, we performed a transposon screen. This biological screen inserts the genetic sequence of a reporting protein (the enzyme β-galactosidase) into random locations of the test organism's DNA. The purpose is to put the reporter in a region that the host organism uses to survive the toxicity of petroleum toxins because this way it would "tell us" that those chemicals are present (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Developing a Toxin Sensing Organism

We performed the transposon screen with the organism Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5: a native tailings pond bacteria shown to degrade oil sands toxins. From this screen strains which responded to general oil sands toxins (sulfur-heterocycles, nitrogen heterocycles, and naphthenic acids) were kept for further analysis. We characterized these strains and selected from the original responders, strains that reacted to oil sands toxins but not general hydrocarbon compounds and stress agents (Figure 3).

Figure 3: FREDsense strain detects toxins. Characterization of one of the transposon strains responsiveness to petroleum toxins using an X-Gal blue-white screening assay. Cells were inoculated in duplicate at different dilutions into LB media as a control, and LB containing different toxin compounds at environmental concentrations. Absorbance was read at 615nm (maximal absorbance of X-gal) every hour.

This response consists of production of a reporter enzyme capable of cleaving a substrate which could then give an electrochemical response. Further testing on one strain using tailings pond samples showed a higher than baseline response, and the organism was capable of survival in the toxic substrate (Figure 4).

Figure 4: FREDsense strain detects toxins in environmental tailing pond sample. Current change over time was monitored in a tailings pond water sample, illustrating lacZ induction by our identified transposon sensory element. Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS) was used as a base-line negative control.

Electrochemical Enzymatic Reporting System:

The reporter proteins utilized by FREDsense are part of a class of enzymes known as hydrolases. Characteristic of these enzymes is recognition and cleavage of their target structure from another compound that it is bound to. An example of this is the protein β-galactosidase (encoded by the gene lacZ). Hydrolases recognizes and cleaves sugars bound to other compounds and has traditionally been used for colorimetric reactions in biological science study. For our purposes we are using sugar bound to electroactive compounds or analytes CPRG, PNPG, and PDPG. Freeing this into CPR, PNP, or PDP respectively, unmasks its charge, permitting electrochemical detection of it in solution by cyclic voltammetry.

Also characteristic of many hydrolases is the specific recognition of their substrates. A cell can produce more than one hydrolase by independent stimuli and those hydrolases can target and cleave their substrates in solution. Many electroactive compounds (analytes) have different oxidation potentials and conveniently can be bound to substrates of the hydrolases. Therefore, different electroactive substrate-bound compounds could be freed from their substrate by the hydrolase that can recognize them specifically, to elicit independent responses that could be observed electrochemically. Analogous to this is the ability to simultaneously observe independently labelled blue, green and red fluorescent particles in a cell.

Figure 5: Developing a Multiplexing Electrochemical Sensor

CPR, PDP, and PNP were used for analytes. Since we were able to confirm that they could be independently detected (Figure 6, left graph), we went on to observe whether hydrolases from living cells could cleave substrate-bound versions of these compounds. The hydrolase was put into standardized plasmid DNA expression systems in laboratory Escherichia coli, under control of an inducible promoter for testing. Other hydrolases were endogenously expressed in the strains of Escherichia coli used for these experiments. Peaks in the graphs represent the appearance of the analytes, using the technique cyclic voltammetry. The graphs in Figure 5 (middle and right), demonstrate that they could cleave their respective substrates to produce detectable analytes. With enzymes capable of cleaving the substrate to release analytes with independently observable peaks, we have produced a system with the potential to multiplex output signals.

Figure 6: Enzymatic production of electro-active compounds in live cells. The oxidation/reduction peaks of the analytes PDP, CPR and PNP are discernible from each other such that they can be observed independently using cyclic voltammetry (left). Cells expressing endogenous hydrolases were exposed to their substrates PDPG and PNPG respectively for the indicated times (middle). Oxidation peaks could be observed corresponding to the where PDP and PNP would be expected. Similarly, cells expressing endogenous hydrolases were exposed to their substrates CPRG and PDPG (right) Oxidation peaks could be observed corresponding to the where CPR and PDP would be expected.

Hardware, Software, and Prototype Design:

Before the FREDsense biosensor can become a product, we needed to begin characterization of the live cell reporting system and design a prototype of how the device would work. We address progress towards prototype design and manufacture in more detail in the Operations section

In making a live cell biosensor, we need to characterize the rate of response in which an enzyme will work to produce the analyte. A kinetic model was built for the activity of a hydrolase in MatLab, predicting that a response could be detected within 4 minutes of adding the substrate to the enzyme when read electrochemically. This experiment was then performed with live cell induction of hydrolase expression. The results were consistent with the model's prediction, informing our design of the protocol for the biosensor. As we characterize the sensing micro-organism more fully, we will use predictive modeling of its behavior to develop quantitative interpretation of toxin level in solution.

Figure 7: Model prediction and experimental results correlate for the production of the electroactive compound PNP. Experimental and modelling results for the uidA gene to cause cleavage of PNPG into PNP. Both results show that a detectable level of PNP is reached in under 4 minutes.

To take our live cell detector into the field, we needed to convert equipment that would normally fill a lab bench to a portable, user-friendly device. We began this process with the design and development of an inexpensive, small, and portable potentiostat. Required circuitry being printed onto a small circuit board. Samples would be loaded through a one-way valve into a sample cartridge (adapted 15mL culture tube) containing the cells, electrochemical substrates, and other reagents required to produce the electrochemical response. The sample cartridge also has a disposable electrode accessible to the sample. The cartridge/electrode plugs into a slot, connecting it to the circuitboard and power source. The device is also equipped with LED lights to indicate what step of the analysis process is currently running and indicate when it has completed.

While more sophisticated potentiostats function well for our detection, we will ultimately need a small portable version that functions well for our needs. We developed a custom software package within the MatLab platform to interpret and display the data obtained from electrochemical measurement. Ultimately we will want the Graphical User Interface (GUI) to convert the amplitude of electrochemical response to the concentration of chemical being sampled.

Figure 8: Cartridge system (left and middle) and early prototype device (middle and right).

Technical Implementation Plan

In order to realize our first generation product, there are several key steps that need to be taken on the research and development front. As such, we have created a detailed Implementation plan describing these necessary milestones. A condensed version can be seen below. Here we list the major technical milestones that need to be completed. These points are listed in order of priority with the earliest described experiments being most critical in evaluating the commercial potential of our technology. As such, the order represents the relative risk of each experiment, with the most high-risk experiments first, where failure to achieve good results could significantly impact the time and cost estimates for the research and development.

• Final characterization of our first generation sensing organism.
• Transferring our electrochemical system into P. fluorescens.
• Transitioning our first product into the final prototyping stages.
• Further screening for future generation products.
• Further multiplexing of our electrochemical system.

Responding to Technological Change

The current technology has been carefully designed in order to easily facilitate the production of next generation products. FREDsense’s unique sensing platform is easily adaptable to monitor a plethora of different compounds of interest using different engineered bacterial strains. Second generation products are being developed including detector products specific to unique classes of chemicals including naphthenic acids and hydrocarbons. As these are specific compounds of interest for many oil sands-related processes, detectors capable of monitoring them with specificity are sought-after. These detectors will make use of FREDsense’s novel generation one sensing platform coupled with newly developed bacterial strains. Being able to directly build upon the existing platform will help ensure FREDsense’s new products can be designed quickly and efficiently so as to have a quicker entry to market than generation one products.

With the introduction of more specific and diverse sensors, this will lead the way for multiple-output detector systems. These will include detectors that can monitor multiple different classes of compounds such as combinations of naphthenic acids, hydrocarbons and general toxins simultaneously. As many locations would require monitoring of a variety of compounds of interest at one sampling time, these second generation sensors will allow one water sample to be taken in order to monitor that sample for several toxins. This will allow for quicker sample extraction and faster results. Again, these products will make use of the generation one electrochemical sensing platform with new engineered bacterial strains.

As with generation one, all later generation products will include integrated controls as well as the speed and reliability of the generation one sensing platform. The modular design of FREDsense’s technology will allow the company to adapt quickly and easily to changes in the regulatory landscape in the oil sands market as well as expand into different markets. This will allow FREDsense to expand the breadth of its detection products without investing significant resources into research and development.

Regulatory Hurdles

Biotechnology products in Canada are regulated by three federal agencies: Health Canada for foods, Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) for seeds and livestock feed, and Environment Canada for new substances intended for environmental release. Our product thus falls under regulation set out by the latter. This regulation falls under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (jointly administered by Environment Canada and Health Canada). Environmental Technology Verification is also required for our technology to be used in this industry. Risk is assessed based on relative toxicity as well as relative amount of exposure to the environment. Specific products are assessed on a one-to-one basis through a dialogue with Environment Canada and Health Canada.

Safety Approval from CEPA

With respect to safety, we need to make our organism approved according to the “New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms)", SOR/2005-248, which is a part of the Canadian Environmental Protection Agency (CEPA) act. Due to our organism being an innocuous, ubiquitous, microbe that is indigenous to soil, we anticipate that performing the experiments required for approval will eventually lead to permission to mass produce this organism. In spite of this, to obtain agency approval we are required to perform extensive tests on our organism and have adequate protocols to prevent accidental release of our organism.

The most important characterizations that we need to disclose include:

• Methodology to identify FREDsense microorganism: describe the organism such that it can be accurately identified in the incidence of escape. This includes genus, species, strain features, and the genetic changes we induced to enable reporting of our sensor. The necessity for these characterizations are already in line with our need for further technological development of our micro-organism sensor, and we hope to have this complete by July 2014.

• Impact and toxicology characterization: environmental impact and toxicological studies are necessary to discover if our strain could impact the local ecosystem, or be a danger to terrestrial and aquatic organisms. To perform these studies we will perform standard toxicology experiments in which it is cultured in the presence of model test organisms. We will also co-culture the strain with indigenous aquatic and soil micro-organisms to determine if gene transfer occurs from our strain and if so, at what rate. With regards to the interest of human health, we will provide the information necessary to distinguish our organism from known pathogens. We hope to have these experiments complete by December 2014.

• Protocol development for accidental release: because our strain will be mass produced and packaged for field use, containment is very important. We will likely use established level 1 biohazard clean-up protocols should our system breach. The protocols will be fully developed when we know the details of how, where, and who will be contracted to manufacture the organism. The device that will be taken to the field is designed to keep the microbe contained within it, whereby a cytotoxic chemical is released to the microbe upon completion of the assay. This chemical compartment will be built into the cartridges and release will be initiated after the assay is run to completion. The final mechanisms for this will be developed as we approach the product development phase where the prototype is finalized.

The deadline for submitting this information for approval is 120 days prior to when we plan to start using the organism. Being well organised and using an innocuous genetically modified organism, we do not expect delay from this regulatory approval. The costs associated with this application are currently in the cost of performing the required tests.

Standards Approval

For the FREDsense biosensor to be a measure of toxins, it needs to produce accurate and reproducible measures of the compounds we claim it is detecting. In the highly regulated field of oil and gas, this is a crucial step towards increasing adoption of the FREDsense biosensor as the industry standard for detection of these compounds. The Environment Canada branch that manages this certification is the Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program (Canadian Environmental Technology Verification Program: Applicant Information Package, Global Performance Solutions) . The program independently validates the claims we make of our product.

EVT is a voluntary internationally recognized program for validation of environmental technologies. Recognition for accuracy and reliability would help assure our investors that our product is credible and has the potential to become widely used in industry and worthy of continued investment. There are several steps associated with gaining validation through this program:

• Eligibility: we to ensure that we are will be screened eligible for the program. The main criteria are: we have the intellectual property right to our technology; its performance claim must meet minimum Canadian standards for that type of technology; the technology must be commercially available for full-scale up at the time of application.

• Technological verification: our product will be validated using either existing data (obtained within the last five years by a reputable third party) or data obtained by a third party source through the ETV program. This data would need to substantiate the performance claim that we would be trying to make about our technology.

• Submission of application: A formal application including the verification data would be submitted for a fee of $1500. At this stage, we would sign a contract with EVT for them to assess our product.

• Review of application: the data submitted is reviewed, and if found sufficient to substantiate the claims, is approved. If this occurs, an award is issued, allowing the technology to be used for 3 years before a re-application is necessary.

When we have the biosensor working as a consistently performing prototype, accurately predicting the levels of chemicals that it can sense in solution, both in the lab and the field, we will go through the EVT certification. Being EVT certified will instill confidence in us by end-users and investors which will aid in the success of our company.

Costs for the process

• Initial application fee: $1500
• Verification fee paid to third party entity: $10000-20000 depending on the nature of the tests required.
• Renewal Fee: $2000/3 years

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Certification

In order to bring our product into the US market, which we hope to do by year five, we need to secure EPA certification. This is the required approval in the United States for biotechnology products. This can be an extremely extensive process, costing up to $300,000. As such, we will need to wait until we have established sales before we begin this process. It is still important to consider this early however, as it is a requirement for entry into US markets.

Conclusion

Through the development of a versatile sensing platform, we hope to be able to meet a critical market need for more rapid and reliable monitoring of toxins in the oil and gas sector. With a solid proof of concept in place, we hope to be able to bring this first generation product to market, as well as several future generation products. As we research to develop and optimize the product we will perform the necessary steps to meet the requirements of regulation for safety and standards.