Latest revision as of 02:32, 2 September 2013

Home

Team

Project

Parts

Protocol

Notebook

Results

Safety

Human Practice

Human Practice

Main

1.Overview

We did questionary survey about the gene recombination to a university student. As a result of questionnaire, we could know that there were many people who had a bad image for gene recombination.

“How do you think of gene recombination?”

Answer result

It is adverse effects to a body.
It might change ecosystem.
It is untrustworthy.
It is difficult.

We thought that we wanted many people to know the good point of genetic modification and the synthetic creature.

2.Posters

We want to convey that experiment of a gene recombination is not a dangerous thing. We made the poster of the question and answer form to make general people understand it.

At first we felt that understanding about the reason why experiment of a gene recombination is dangerous for general people didn't have enough information. Therefore we commented on the risk of the gene recombination experiment from a point of view of the diffusion the recombination creature to the environment. And we gave the following examples and explained that there was an international decision for nonproliferation of the gene recombination creature to the environment.

There are P1, P2, P3 level in the laboratory where we experiment of gene recombination.
There is Cartagena Protocol about the handling of the gene recombination creature.

Our university has the laboratory of P1 and P2 level. We explained to a general person that we abide for nonproliferation of the genetically-modified creature to the environment.

And we made the poster about the activity contents of the iGEM.

3.Questionnaire

Our survey consisted of the following questions:

Q1.Are you interested in genetic modification?
Q2.What kind of impression did you have about genetic modification before hearing this explanation?
Q3.After having heard this explanation, what kind of impression did you have about genetic modification?
Q4.Was our explanation plain?
Q5.Were you interested in genetic modification?

2013Questionnaire(pdf)

4.Conclusions

As a result of our Human Practice, we conveyed gene recombination as a right knowledge and were able to change the consciousness of many people. We strongly think that synthetic biology will greatly develop in the near future.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 [[File:KAIT Japan 2013 iGEMRogo.png|link=http://ung.igem.org/Main_Page]]
 {| style="width:98.5%; margin-left:0.2em; border-color:#f30; border-style:solid; border-collapse:collapse; background-color:#fc6; text-align:left"
-| style="width:25%" style="vertical-align:top |
+| style="width:25%" valign="top" |
 :[[File:KAIT Japan home.png|link=Team:KAIT_Japan]] [[Team:KAIT_Japan|Home]]
 :[[File:KAIT Japan team.png|link=Team:KAIT_Japan/Team]] [[Team:KAIT_Japan/Team|Team]]
@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
-| style="border-left:3px solid #f30" |
+| style="border-left:3px solid #f30" valign="top" |
 ='''Human Practice'''=
+=='''Main'''==
+:<big>'''1.Overview'''</big>
+::We did questionary survey about the gene recombination to a university student. As a result of questionnaire, we could know that there were many people who had a bad image for gene recombination.
+:::“How do you think of gene recombination?”
+:::  Answer result
+:::*It is adverse effects to a body.
+:::*It might change ecosystem.
+:::*It is untrustworthy.
+:::*It is difficult.
+:::We thought that we wanted many people to know the good point of genetic modification and the synthetic creature.
+:<big>'''2.Posters'''</big>
+::  We want to convey that experiment of a gene recombination is not a dangerous thing. We made the poster of the question and answer form to make general people understand it.
+::  At first we felt that understanding about the reason why experiment of a gene recombination is dangerous for general people didn't have enough information. Therefore we commented on the risk of the gene recombination experiment from a point of view of the diffusion the recombination creature to the environment. And we gave the following examples and explained that there was an international decision for nonproliferation of the gene recombination creature to the environment.
+::*  There are P1, P2, P3 level in the laboratory where we experiment of gene recombination.
+::*  There is Cartagena Protocol about the handling of the gene recombination creature.
+:::  Our university has the laboratory of P1 and P2 level. We explained to a general person that we abide for nonproliferation of the genetically-modified creature to the environment.
+::  And we made the poster about the activity contents of the iGEM.
+:<big>'''3.Questionnaire'''</big>
+::Our survey consisted of the following questions:
+:::*Q1.Are you interested in genetic modification?
+:::*Q2.What kind of impression did you have about genetic modification before hearing this explanation?
+:::*Q3.After having heard this explanation, what kind of impression did you have about genetic modification?
+:::*Q4.Was our explanation plain?
+:::*Q5.Were you interested in genetic modification?
+:'''https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/d4/Gu.png<br>'''
+<br>
+:::[https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/29/Enquete.pdf_2013_Questionnaire%28pdf%29.pdf 2013Questionnaire(pdf)]
+:<big>'''4.Conclusions'''</big>
+::  As a result of our Human Practice, we conveyed gene recombination as a right knowledge and were able to change the consciousness of many people. We strongly think that synthetic biology will greatly develop in the near future.
 |}

Team:KAIT Japan/Human Practice

From 2013.igem.org

Latest revision as of 02:32, 2 September 2013

Human Practice

Main