Team:UGent/Ethics/Prof dr Tom Desmet

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{:Team:UGent/Templates/Navigation}}
{{:Team:UGent/Templates/Navigation}}
<html>
<html>
-
<h1>Prof. dr. ir. Wim Soetaert</h1>
+
<h1>Prof. dr. Tom Desmet</h1>
-
<h2>In order to live happily, live hidden</h2>
+
<h2>Synthetic biology is a more clever variant of natural selection</h2>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c6/UGent_2013_Prof_dr_ir_Wim_Soetaert.jpg" align="left" width="170" hspace="20">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/c/c6/UGent_2013_Prof_dr_ir_Wim_Soetaert.jpg" align="left" width="170" hspace="20">
<p class="font">
<p class="font">
-
Wim Soetaert is a chemical and biochemical engineer who heads the Centre of Expertise for Industrial Biotechnology and Biocatalysis at the University of Ghent, Faculty of BioScience Engineering. His research group is active in the development of fermentative and biocatalytic production processes. Prof. Soetaert received a PhD in bioengineering from Ghent University. He worked as a research director in Germany and France, for the sugar group Pfeifer & Langen and the wheat processing company Chamtor.
+
Dr. Tom Desmet studied Medicine and Biochemistry at Ghent University, where he obtained his Ph.D. in 2005. His main interests are the specificity and mechanism of glycoside hydrolases. Tom Desmet is coordinator of the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7). The goal of this research project is the development of biocatalytic processes for the glycosylation of small organic molecules such as flavonoids, alkaloids and steroids in order to improve both the physicochemical and biological properties of these molecules. Tom Desmet is Associate Professor for Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering at the University of Ghent and teaches Biocatalysis and Enzyme Technology.
-
<br><br>
+
 
-
He is the founder and chairman of Ghent Bio-Energy Valley, a public-private partnership to promote the development of biobased activities in the Ghent area. Soetaert is also the director of the Bio Base Europe Pilot Plant, an open innovation pilot plant for biobased products and processes based in Ghent.
+
</p>   
</p>   
Line 14: Line 13:
<p>
<p>
-
Prof. Soetaert is of the opinion that synthetic biology is a field of science parallel to that of the industrial biotechnology, but synthetic biology goes that little further. It is a discipline that happens <b>here and now </b>and is the most natural thing in the world, as a manner of speaking. People have already been manipulating horses and cows for a certain amount of time, now they just move three steps further. The question is: <b>“Are you in or not?”</b>
+
There are a lot of different perspectives of the concept of synthetic biology. Prof Desmet is a big proponent of this field of science and according to him; synthetic biology is creating life from scratch: you put some bricks into a vesicle in order to create a functional unit. It does not matter whether you call creating a new entity (such as a micro-organism) creating new life or creating a biological machine. It depends on the ability of the new entity to reproduce. In nature, such a new entity probably won’t survive, due to competition with other bacteria. Among people, ‘life’ still is seen as something magical, but in fact life is just a cell, that follows the rules of thermodynamics. Knowing that, it’s certainly acceptable to create life.
-
Creating a new entity (such as a micro-organism) can be seen as creating a biological machine, rather than ‘creating life’. Because what ís life? The public’s opinions on that are usually based on a gut feeling and not a rational given.  
+
<br><br>
<br><br>
-
You don’t know the long term effects when creating something new, but does this mean you shouldn’t do it? Most certainly not! If cavemen had asked themselves: “Making fire, it might be dangerous, is this morally justified?”, we would still be living in caves. Searching for zero risk is nonsense and it doesn’t even exist, but of course you have to be responsible and you shouldn’t play with fire. When we asked prof. Soetaert the following question: <i> is it morally justified to create something new without knowing the long-term consequences?</i> he answered: “What a badly phrased question!” “Morality” is often a misused word according to Wim Soetaert. The way we interpret the meaning of morality is related to the behaviour of our species. People are cooperative workers, rather than individual workers. The individuality and evolution of a species determine its moral demeanor. <b>In fact, human morality has essentially a genetic basis. </b>
+
Prof. Desmet is not a big fan of patents and is of the opinion that genes or anything produced by nature should not be patented. Patents are a necessary evil, but it is important you want one for the right reasons. For example when a company has put a lot of thinking and effort into optimizing the process that combines all the bricks into a functional unit, it is understandable it wants recognition for its achievements.
<br><br>
<br><br>
-
The problem with GMOs has not really reached Soetaert’s area of expertise. As long as GMO’s are used in a fermenter in so-called “contained use” and are not being released in nature, organizations such as Greenpeace won’t utter objections. Greenpeace is basically against the deliberate release of genetically modified organisms in nature, prof. Soetaert on the other hand does not agree on this matter.
+
In history, a lot went wrong communication-wise. And once you have made mistakes, it is very difficult to fix them. Therefore it is very important to provide a good explanation to the general public. When micro-organisms are manipulated in a confined environment, it is easier to gain the general public’s acceptance. Anyhow, Tom Desmet does not have any problems with GMOs, whether they are manipulated in a confined environment or they are released in nature.
<br><br>
<br><br>
-
A good synthetic biologist should not blaze around that he or she is ‘creating life’. This only creates fear among the general public and that’s why prof. Soetaert advocates <b>“Pour vivre heureux, vivons cachés.” </b> In order to live happily, live hidden!</p>
+
What about morality and creating new entities without knowing the long term consequences? According to prof. Desmet, this is morally justified because it happens all the time in nature: new variants of species are continuously created. In nature the law of ‘survival of the fittest’ applies, synthetic biologists just think in a more directed way before creating a new variant. In this respect, synthetic biology can actually be seen as a more clever variant of natural selection. 
 +
</p>
</html>
</html>
{{:Team:UGent/Templates/Footer}}
{{:Team:UGent/Templates/Footer}}
{{:Team:UGent/Templates/BaseSponsor}}
{{:Team:UGent/Templates/BaseSponsor}}

Revision as of 13:59, 2 October 2013

UGent 2013 Banner.jpg

Prof. dr. Tom Desmet

Synthetic biology is a more clever variant of natural selection

Dr. Tom Desmet studied Medicine and Biochemistry at Ghent University, where he obtained his Ph.D. in 2005. His main interests are the specificity and mechanism of glycoside hydrolases. Tom Desmet is coordinator of the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7). The goal of this research project is the development of biocatalytic processes for the glycosylation of small organic molecules such as flavonoids, alkaloids and steroids in order to improve both the physicochemical and biological properties of these molecules. Tom Desmet is Associate Professor for Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering at the University of Ghent and teaches Biocatalysis and Enzyme Technology.


There are a lot of different perspectives of the concept of synthetic biology. Prof Desmet is a big proponent of this field of science and according to him; synthetic biology is creating life from scratch: you put some bricks into a vesicle in order to create a functional unit. It does not matter whether you call creating a new entity (such as a micro-organism) creating new life or creating a biological machine. It depends on the ability of the new entity to reproduce. In nature, such a new entity probably won’t survive, due to competition with other bacteria. Among people, ‘life’ still is seen as something magical, but in fact life is just a cell, that follows the rules of thermodynamics. Knowing that, it’s certainly acceptable to create life.

Prof. Desmet is not a big fan of patents and is of the opinion that genes or anything produced by nature should not be patented. Patents are a necessary evil, but it is important you want one for the right reasons. For example when a company has put a lot of thinking and effort into optimizing the process that combines all the bricks into a functional unit, it is understandable it wants recognition for its achievements.

In history, a lot went wrong communication-wise. And once you have made mistakes, it is very difficult to fix them. Therefore it is very important to provide a good explanation to the general public. When micro-organisms are manipulated in a confined environment, it is easier to gain the general public’s acceptance. Anyhow, Tom Desmet does not have any problems with GMOs, whether they are manipulated in a confined environment or they are released in nature.

What about morality and creating new entities without knowing the long term consequences? According to prof. Desmet, this is morally justified because it happens all the time in nature: new variants of species are continuously created. In nature the law of ‘survival of the fittest’ applies, synthetic biologists just think in a more directed way before creating a new variant. In this respect, synthetic biology can actually be seen as a more clever variant of natural selection.

Project: NetSite...JavaScript Countdown Clock

Days: Hours: Mins: Secs:
Until Jamboree Lyon

Alt text




Flag Counter

We thank following sponsors for their support

Bio Base Europe Pilot Plant
Inbio
Bioké Novolab
MRP UGent