Team:Newcastle/Project/plants
From 2013.igem.org
m |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=L-forms in Plants= | =L-forms in Plants= | ||
- | == | + | ==Overview== |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | It is thought that L-forms may exist in plants in a symbiotic relationship with the plant providing a suitable environment for the osmolarity sensitive bacteria. In return, L-forms can confer benefits to their host including reducing the rate of fungal infection. L-forms have ethical benefits, as they will lyse upon leaving their host plants. It may be possible to create L-forms which produce and supply nutrients to the plant they reside in. This will be especially useful if the L-forms host is unable to synthesise the nutrients provided by the bacteria. Therefore, in the future we could use L-forms to support crop growth in nutrient-lacking soil with the knowledge that the L-forms cannot escape into the environment. | |
+ | |||
+ | Once we have introduced L-forms into plants, it may be possible to see which plant tissues L-forms colonize at a high concentration, and so infer which areas of the plant best suit L-form growth. | ||
- | |||
==Methods== | ==Methods== | ||
- | In order to prove that L-forms can grow in plants, we | + | In order to prove that L-forms can grow in plants, we considered transforming B. subtillis strain LR2 with the ''gusA'' reporter gene coding for β-glucuronidase. We would have removed ''gusA'' BioBrick from its plasmid backbone and attach it to another plasmid containg AprE for homologous recombination and kanamycin resistance for selection. We would then have transformed ''B. subtillis'' with the new transformation vector. The bacteria that have taken up the plasmid can would have been selected for via kanamycin resistance. A transformation vector would have been used rather than a normal plasmid so that ''gusA'' would integrate through homologous recombination into the bacteria’s chromosome, securing the expressing of the ''gusA''. |
- | The β-glucuronidase produced by the L-forms in plants | + | The β-glucuronidase produced by the L-forms in plants would cleave the colourless substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide (X-Gluc) to produce a blue product allowing the L-form distribution in plant tissue to be observed. |
==Alternative Methods Considered== | ==Alternative Methods Considered== | ||
- | '''Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) | + | |
+ | ====Beta-glucuronidase assay==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In order to prove that L-forms can grow in plants, we considered transforming B. subtillis strain LR2 with the ''gusA'' reporter gene coding for β-glucuronidase. We would have removed ''gusA'' BioBrick from its plasmid backbone and attach it to another plasmid containg AprE for homologous recombination and kanamycin resistance for selection. We would then have transformed ''B. subtillis'' with the new transformation vector. The bacteria that have taken up the plasmid can would have been selected for via kanamycin resistance. A transformation vector would have been used rather than a normal plasmid so that ''gusA'' would integrate through homologous recombination into the bacteria’s chromosome, securing the expressing of the ''gusA''. | ||
+ | The β-glucuronidase produced by the L-forms in plants would cleave the colourless substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide (X-Gluc) to produce a blue product allowing the L-form distribution in plant tissue to be observed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)==== | ||
We considered producing an ELISA to detect L-forms. One method would be to generate antibodies against a L-form specific antigen. Alternatively we considered introducing a novel gene into L-forms to result in a novel antigen being produced for us to generate antibodies against. However this would have involved using animals to generate polyclonal antibodies. We decided this raised ethical issues and was too time consuming to complete in our ten week placement. | We considered producing an ELISA to detect L-forms. One method would be to generate antibodies against a L-form specific antigen. Alternatively we considered introducing a novel gene into L-forms to result in a novel antigen being produced for us to generate antibodies against. However this would have involved using animals to generate polyclonal antibodies. We decided this raised ethical issues and was too time consuming to complete in our ten week placement. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
- | Tsomlexoglou, E., Daulagala, P.W.H.K.P., Gooday, G.W., Glover, L.A., Seddon, B. and Allan, E.J. (2003) 'Molecular detection and β-glucuronidase expression of gus-marked Bacillus subtilis L-form bacteria in developing Chinese cabbage seedlings', Journal of Applied Microbiology, 95(2), pp. 218-224. | + | Tsomlexoglou, E., Daulagala, P.W.H.K.P., Gooday, G.W., Glover, L.A., Seddon, B. and Allan, E.J. (2003) 'Molecular detection and β-glucuronidase expression of gus-marked ''Bacillus subtilis'' L-form bacteria in developing Chinese cabbage seedlings', Journal of Applied Microbiology, 95(2), pp. 218-224. |
Ferguson, C.M.J., Booth, N.A. and Allan, E.J. (2000) 'An ELISA for the detection of Bacillus subtilis L-form bacteria confirms their symbiosis in strawberry', Letters in Applied Microbiology, 31(5), pp. 390-394. | Ferguson, C.M.J., Booth, N.A. and Allan, E.J. (2000) 'An ELISA for the detection of Bacillus subtilis L-form bacteria confirms their symbiosis in strawberry', Letters in Applied Microbiology, 31(5), pp. 390-394. |
Revision as of 12:23, 8 August 2013
Contents |
L-forms in Plants
Overview
It is thought that L-forms may exist in plants in a symbiotic relationship with the plant providing a suitable environment for the osmolarity sensitive bacteria. In return, L-forms can confer benefits to their host including reducing the rate of fungal infection. L-forms have ethical benefits, as they will lyse upon leaving their host plants. It may be possible to create L-forms which produce and supply nutrients to the plant they reside in. This will be especially useful if the L-forms host is unable to synthesise the nutrients provided by the bacteria. Therefore, in the future we could use L-forms to support crop growth in nutrient-lacking soil with the knowledge that the L-forms cannot escape into the environment.
Once we have introduced L-forms into plants, it may be possible to see which plant tissues L-forms colonize at a high concentration, and so infer which areas of the plant best suit L-form growth.
Methods
In order to prove that L-forms can grow in plants, we considered transforming B. subtillis strain LR2 with the gusA reporter gene coding for β-glucuronidase. We would have removed gusA BioBrick from its plasmid backbone and attach it to another plasmid containg AprE for homologous recombination and kanamycin resistance for selection. We would then have transformed B. subtillis with the new transformation vector. The bacteria that have taken up the plasmid can would have been selected for via kanamycin resistance. A transformation vector would have been used rather than a normal plasmid so that gusA would integrate through homologous recombination into the bacteria’s chromosome, securing the expressing of the gusA. The β-glucuronidase produced by the L-forms in plants would cleave the colourless substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide (X-Gluc) to produce a blue product allowing the L-form distribution in plant tissue to be observed.
Alternative Methods Considered
Beta-glucuronidase assay
In order to prove that L-forms can grow in plants, we considered transforming B. subtillis strain LR2 with the gusA reporter gene coding for β-glucuronidase. We would have removed gusA BioBrick from its plasmid backbone and attach it to another plasmid containg AprE for homologous recombination and kanamycin resistance for selection. We would then have transformed B. subtillis with the new transformation vector. The bacteria that have taken up the plasmid can would have been selected for via kanamycin resistance. A transformation vector would have been used rather than a normal plasmid so that gusA would integrate through homologous recombination into the bacteria’s chromosome, securing the expressing of the gusA. The β-glucuronidase produced by the L-forms in plants would cleave the colourless substrate 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide (X-Gluc) to produce a blue product allowing the L-form distribution in plant tissue to be observed.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
We considered producing an ELISA to detect L-forms. One method would be to generate antibodies against a L-form specific antigen. Alternatively we considered introducing a novel gene into L-forms to result in a novel antigen being produced for us to generate antibodies against. However this would have involved using animals to generate polyclonal antibodies. We decided this raised ethical issues and was too time consuming to complete in our ten week placement.
References
Tsomlexoglou, E., Daulagala, P.W.H.K.P., Gooday, G.W., Glover, L.A., Seddon, B. and Allan, E.J. (2003) 'Molecular detection and β-glucuronidase expression of gus-marked Bacillus subtilis L-form bacteria in developing Chinese cabbage seedlings', Journal of Applied Microbiology, 95(2), pp. 218-224.
Ferguson, C.M.J., Booth, N.A. and Allan, E.J. (2000) 'An ELISA for the detection of Bacillus subtilis L-form bacteria confirms their symbiosis in strawberry', Letters in Applied Microbiology, 31(5), pp. 390-394.