Team:SJTU-BioX-Shanghai/Results/Test/Overall
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Measure mRFP Expression) |
(→Plasmid mRFP test) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
[[File:SJTU13mRFP.png]] | [[File:SJTU13mRFP.png]] | ||
- | Figure 2. Relationship between mRFP expression and light intensity.<br> (a). Quantitative measurement of mRFP produc-tion under different light intensities. Bar height represents mRFP production in 15 hours under different light intensi-ties. Error bars shows the standard error (s.e.) of parallel groups. mRFP production gradually increases about one-fold.<br> (b). A photo of the experiment result in Figure 2a. The red color gradient of mRFP is observable even by naked eye. | + | '''Figure 2. Relationship between mRFP expression and light intensity.'''<br> (a). Quantitative measurement of mRFP produc-tion under different light intensities. Bar height represents mRFP production in 15 hours under different light intensi-ties. Error bars shows the standard error (s.e.) of parallel groups. mRFP production gradually increases about one-fold.<br> (b). A photo of the experiment result in Figure 2a. The red color gradient of mRFP is observable even by naked eye. |
Three properties make our sensor-CRISPRi suitable for precise regulation: | Three properties make our sensor-CRISPRi suitable for precise regulation: | ||
· Under optical saturation, mRFP is produced about twice as fast as it is in the darkness, indicat-ing a relatively wide range for adjusting regulation effect. And the regulation range can be further enlarged by intro-ducing additional gRNAs for the same target. | · Under optical saturation, mRFP is produced about twice as fast as it is in the darkness, indicat-ing a relatively wide range for adjusting regulation effect. And the regulation range can be further enlarged by intro-ducing additional gRNAs for the same target. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
· The squared Pearson coefficient (R2) of linear fit is calculated to be 0.901. So the expression is stably accelerated as we lift up light intensity (even if the relationship is not strictly linear), making it easier for researchers to locate an optimal regula-tion. | · The squared Pearson coefficient (R2) of linear fit is calculated to be 0.901. So the expression is stably accelerated as we lift up light intensity (even if the relationship is not strictly linear), making it easier for researchers to locate an optimal regula-tion. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
· The variance (standard errors are represented as error bars in Figure 2a) is relatively small. So our system is stable, and a pre-determined working curve can be referenced in later experiments. | · The variance (standard errors are represented as error bars in Figure 2a) is relatively small. So our system is stable, and a pre-determined working curve can be referenced in later experiments. | ||
Revision as of 01:13, 17 January 2014