Team:UNITN-Trento/Project/Blue light
From 2013.igem.org
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e8/Blue_fluorimeter-plot.jpg" style="max-width:860px; border: 2px solid white; box-shadow:2px 2px 2px #323232"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e8/Blue_fluorimeter-plot.jpg" style="max-width:860px; border: 2px solid white; box-shadow:2px 2px 2px #323232"/> | ||
<span class="caption"> | <span class="caption"> | ||
- | <b>Fig. 3:</ | + | <b>Fig. 3:</b> by measuring the absorbance of the three samples (588 nm), we observed a substantial difference between the dark control and the other two samples; this is a quantitative proof that the production of AMILCP at dark was strongly repressed. The graph also proves that white light induction is a little less efficient. |
</span> | </span> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
Line 181: | Line 181: | ||
</h3> | </h3> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/dd/Tn-2013_Norbs_yellowpart.jpeg" class="part"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/dd/Tn-2013_Norbs_yellowpart.jpeg" class="part"/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
The part extracted from the registry missed a RBS sequence, resulting in a nonfunctional part. We decided to <b>improve this part</b> by inserting the missing RBS with a mutagenesis PCR. The mutagenesis was <b>successfull</b>. | The part extracted from the registry missed a RBS sequence, resulting in a nonfunctional part. We decided to <b>improve this part</b> by inserting the missing RBS with a mutagenesis PCR. The mutagenesis was <b>successfull</b>. | ||
Line 188: | Line 189: | ||
</h3> | </h3> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/20/Tn-2013_Rbs_yellowpart.jpeg" class="part"/> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/20/Tn-2013_Rbs_yellowpart.jpeg" class="part"/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
In order to have it tested and characterized, we also added the pLac promoter ahead as already shown (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1065302">BBa_K1065302</a>). | In order to have it tested and characterized, we also added the pLac promoter ahead as already shown (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1065302">BBa_K1065302</a>). | ||
Line 197: | Line 199: | ||
The test involved the induction of both, the improved circuit and the original part, in order to demonstrate the actual enhancement of the device. So we compared samples depending on two factors: induction/non induction & RBS/no RBS. We also took some quantitative measurements at the fluorometer considering that amilGFP is a fluorescent protein that emits at 512 nm and absorbs at 503 nm. | The test involved the induction of both, the improved circuit and the original part, in order to demonstrate the actual enhancement of the device. So we compared samples depending on two factors: induction/non induction & RBS/no RBS. We also took some quantitative measurements at the fluorometer considering that amilGFP is a fluorescent protein that emits at 512 nm and absorbs at 503 nm. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <img class="photo" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/22/Tn-2013_part_improvement_plot.jpg"/> | + | <img class="photo" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/22/Tn-2013_part_improvement_plot.jpg" style="width:61%;"/> |
- | <img class="photo" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/b1/Tn-2013_Part_improvement.jpg"/> | + | <img class="photo" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/b1/Tn-2013_Part_improvement.jpg" style="width: 30%;height: 357px;"/> |
<span class="caption"> | <span class="caption"> | ||
<b>Fig. 4: Slight yellow shad appears only in the induced sample with RBS</b>: After the culture with <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1065302" >Bba_K1065302</a> reached OD= 0.7 we split it into 2 samples of 5ml at 37°: blue light exposed control (2) and induced sample at dark (1).We also made 2 sample (3 and 4) at the same conditions from a culture transformed with the original part missing the RBS, in order to compare the original part to the improved one. From both the image and the plot we can confirm that <b>our part with RBS is undeniably improved and works as expected</b>. | <b>Fig. 4: Slight yellow shad appears only in the induced sample with RBS</b>: After the culture with <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1065302" >Bba_K1065302</a> reached OD= 0.7 we split it into 2 samples of 5ml at 37°: blue light exposed control (2) and induced sample at dark (1).We also made 2 sample (3 and 4) at the same conditions from a culture transformed with the original part missing the RBS, in order to compare the original part to the improved one. From both the image and the plot we can confirm that <b>our part with RBS is undeniably improved and works as expected</b>. |
Revision as of 15:08, 21 September 2013
Results - Blue Light
We decided to develop a photo-inducible genetic circuit that triggers the production of Ethylene in presence of blue light (470 nm), and stops at dark.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/ab/Tn-2013_Photoreceptor_path.png)
We thought to use blue light as our inducer because it would fit perfectly to our very own B. fruity vending machine, being the easiest way to control a genetic device in a totally automated scaffold. All parts have been transformed and characterized in E. coli (strain NEB10b).
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/fb/Tn-2013_Bluelight_viola_tom_br1.jpg)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/a/a7/Tn-2013_Bluelight_cate.jpg)
The device
We aimed at first to get ethylene production at blue light (470 nm) and the off state at dark, so we went for the design of a blue light dependent device that includes an inverter cassette.
BBa_K1065310
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/3/3c/Tn-2013_bluelight_Constructs.jpg)
We engineered in E. coli a blue-light sensor composed by:
- Anderson promoter BBa_J23100;
- the blue light receptor YF1, which consist of YtvA from B. subtilis fused to a kinase domain (fixL) from B. japonicum (Möglich A, Ayers RA, Moffat K. 2008);
- its response regulator, FixJ;
- a downstream promoter PfixK2, which is turned off by phosphorylated FixJ;
- an inverter cassette composed of cI and Plambda;
- a reporter (chromoprotein amilCP), which was later substituted by EFE (our ethylene forming enzyme).
To assemble this device we used the following parts from the registry:
- Bba_J23100 from Berkeley 2006 iGEM team;
- Bba_K592016 from Uppsala 2011 iGEM team;
- BBa_K592020 from Uppsala 2011 iGEM team.
We characterized this circuit along with the version without the inverter cassette (activated at dark and inhibited by blue light). Thus we also created the part:
BBa_K1065302
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/6/68/Tn-2013_Blue_noinverter.jpg)
If you are interested in all the molecular details of these circuits, please check our datapage
Different sources of blue light induces AmilCP production in the "inverted circuit"
We first assembled the “inverted circuit” with a blue chromo-protein (AmilCP) downstream instead of EFE to obtain easy-to-watch and clear characterization results.
At first we compared the induction power of several light sources:
- 1 LED blue light;
- 1 blue light bulb;
- 1 white light bulb.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/73/Tn-2013_Diff_lights_induction.jpg)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e8/Tn-2013_different_lights_pic.jpg)
Then we decided to use only blue LED and normal light as inducers in further tests.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/4/40/Tn-2013_bluelight_inverte_pic2.jpg)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/ba/Tn-2013_bluelight_noinverter_pic2.jpg)
Moreover, AmilCP has an absorbance peak at 588 nm so we measured the absorbance peak with the spectrophotometer in order to have concrete data.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/e/e8/Blue_fluorimeter-plot.jpg)
We carried out several tests in order to demonstrate the reproducibility of the behavior, although sometimes we observed amilCP production even in the dark control, so we could assume that the circuit doesn’t act like a perfectly controlled switch. We can make a speculation on the cause: probably the inverter cassette presence is responsible of this flawed behavior; Plambda is actually a strong promoter but CI transcription is at the end of a pretty long cascade that is likely to produce low CI; this means that there isn’t enough inhibitor to block Plambda activity. In order to confirm our theory we tested also the circuit without the inverter. This device, on the contrary, is designed to get switched on at dark and to be inhibited by blue light though. We extracted the part BBa_k952003, the circuit with the reporter AMILGFP (yellow fluorescent protein).
BBa_K952003
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/d/dd/Tn-2013_Norbs_yellowpart.jpeg)
The part extracted from the registry missed a RBS sequence, resulting in a nonfunctional part. We decided to improve this part by inserting the missing RBS with a mutagenesis PCR. The mutagenesis was successfull.
BBa_K1065305
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/20/Tn-2013_Rbs_yellowpart.jpeg)
In order to have it tested and characterized, we also added the pLac promoter ahead as already shown (BBa_K1065302).
Better defined switch observed in the circuit wothout inverter
The test involved the induction of both, the improved circuit and the original part, in order to demonstrate the actual enhancement of the device. So we compared samples depending on two factors: induction/non induction & RBS/no RBS. We also took some quantitative measurements at the fluorometer considering that amilGFP is a fluorescent protein that emits at 512 nm and absorbs at 503 nm.
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/2/22/Tn-2013_part_improvement_plot.jpg)
![](https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/b/b1/Tn-2013_Part_improvement.jpg)