Team:UC Davis/Database/Initial Population

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(first paragraph of initial population finished)
Line 12: Line 12:
<h1>Initial Population of BBCDD</h1>
<h1>Initial Population of BBCDD</h1>
<p>
<p>
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/2/28/Depot_collaborative_population.png" width=600px height=340><br>
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/2/28/Depot_collaborative_population.png" width=700px height=380><br>
Teams ZJU-China, UCSF, Stanford-Brown, and Bielefeld-Germany collaborated with our team in an effort to see how our promoter characterization standards worked in practice, while also further characterizing the Anderson Promoter Collection (J23100-J23119). Their collaborative efforts taught new and verified many important facets in making data standards: understanding the strict timetables of teams, communicating in a common vocabulary, and learning what components of the characterization process can be standardized. Most importantly, however, this process showed iGEM-er's eagerness to share.  
Teams ZJU-China, UCSF, Stanford-Brown, and Bielefeld-Germany collaborated with our team in an effort to see how our promoter characterization standards worked in practice, while also further characterizing the Anderson Promoter Collection (J23100-J23119). Their collaborative efforts taught new and verified many important facets in making data standards: understanding the strict timetables of teams, communicating in a common vocabulary, and learning what components of the characterization process can be standardized. Most importantly, however, this process showed iGEM-er's eagerness to share.  
</p>
</p>

Revision as of 00:40, 27 September 2013

Initial Population of BBCDD


Teams ZJU-China, UCSF, Stanford-Brown, and Bielefeld-Germany collaborated with our team in an effort to see how our promoter characterization standards worked in practice, while also further characterizing the Anderson Promoter Collection (J23100-J23119). Their collaborative efforts taught new and verified many important facets in making data standards: understanding the strict timetables of teams, communicating in a common vocabulary, and learning what components of the characterization process can be standardized. Most importantly, however, this process showed iGEM-er's eagerness to share.