"
Team:UC Davis/Database/Initial Population
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(first paragraph of initial population finished) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<h1>Initial Population of BBCDD</h1> | <h1>Initial Population of BBCDD</h1> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| - | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/2/28/Depot_collaborative_population.png" width= | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/2/28/Depot_collaborative_population.png" width=700px height=380><br> |
Teams ZJU-China, UCSF, Stanford-Brown, and Bielefeld-Germany collaborated with our team in an effort to see how our promoter characterization standards worked in practice, while also further characterizing the Anderson Promoter Collection (J23100-J23119). Their collaborative efforts taught new and verified many important facets in making data standards: understanding the strict timetables of teams, communicating in a common vocabulary, and learning what components of the characterization process can be standardized. Most importantly, however, this process showed iGEM-er's eagerness to share. | Teams ZJU-China, UCSF, Stanford-Brown, and Bielefeld-Germany collaborated with our team in an effort to see how our promoter characterization standards worked in practice, while also further characterizing the Anderson Promoter Collection (J23100-J23119). Their collaborative efforts taught new and verified many important facets in making data standards: understanding the strict timetables of teams, communicating in a common vocabulary, and learning what components of the characterization process can be standardized. Most importantly, however, this process showed iGEM-er's eagerness to share. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 00:40, 27 September 2013
Initial Population of BBCDD
Teams ZJU-China, UCSF, Stanford-Brown, and Bielefeld-Germany collaborated with our team in an effort to see how our promoter characterization standards worked in practice, while also further characterizing the Anderson Promoter Collection (J23100-J23119). Their collaborative efforts taught new and verified many important facets in making data standards: understanding the strict timetables of teams, communicating in a common vocabulary, and learning what components of the characterization process can be standardized. Most importantly, however, this process showed iGEM-er's eagerness to share.
