Team:UNITN-Trento/Project/Methyl Salicylate
From 2013.igem.org
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<div class= "tn-doublephoto-wrap"> | <div class= "tn-doublephoto-wrap"> | ||
- | <img class="plot" style="height: 280px;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/4/4f/Tn-2013_Taratura_MeSA.jpg"/> | + | <img class="plot" style="height: 280px; width: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/4/4f/Tn-2013_Taratura_MeSA.jpg"/> |
- | <img class="plot" style="height: 280px;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/79/Tn-2013_Pedro_GC.JPG" /> | + | <img class="plot" style="height: 280px; width: auto;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/7/79/Tn-2013_Pedro_GC.JPG" /> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<span style="text-align:justify;" class="tn-caption center"><b>Figure 3:</b> Left panel: calibration curve obtained with different concentrations of pure MeSA in ethanol. We chose to use ethanol to build up the calibration curve because at the beginning we had some problems with the solubility of the methyl salicylate. However, during our experience were also performed many measures to verify the equivalence of using ethanol and LB as matrix for dissolving MeSA. Right panel: GC-FID in action </span> | <span style="text-align:justify;" class="tn-caption center"><b>Figure 3:</b> Left panel: calibration curve obtained with different concentrations of pure MeSA in ethanol. We chose to use ethanol to build up the calibration curve because at the beginning we had some problems with the solubility of the methyl salicylate. However, during our experience were also performed many measures to verify the equivalence of using ethanol and LB as matrix for dissolving MeSA. Right panel: GC-FID in action </span> |
Revision as of 13:04, 3 October 2013
B. fruity needed also a fruit ripening ihnibitor. It was difficult to find a volatile molecule that could be enzymatically produced by a bacteria and also proofed to be an efficient ripening inhbitor. There were not many candidates to choose from and after a long search we found methyl salicylate (MeSA). Previous work suggested that MeSA inhibits the ripening of kiwifruit (Aghdam M. et al., Journal of Agricultural Science. June 2011, Vol. 3, 2, pp. 149-156) and tomatoes, at a concentration of 0.5 mM (Ding, C. and Wang, Plant Science 2003, Y. 164 pp. 589-596).
We were happy to find out that many of the needed parts to produce MeSA were already available in the registry. These parts were initally built by the MIT 2006 iGEM team for the project Eau de coli.
We modified and improved these parts and resubmitted them to the registry. For example, we substituted the pTet promoter controlling the BSMT1 enzyme with an araC-pBAD promoter. Additionally the MIT team did not include in their MeSA generator device the enzyme SAM synthetase, that we hope will boost MeSA production. We also have re-submitted in pSB1C3 the single enzymes of the pathway.
MeSA detectionMeSA is an highly volatile liquid with a distinct minty fragrance. We exploited the physical properties of MeSA to quantify its production by gas chromatography using a Finnigan Trace GC ULTRA connected to a flame ionization detector (FID). This kind of instrument, is able to detect ions formed during MeSA combustion in a hydrogen flame. The generation of this ions is proportional to MeSA concentration in the sample stream. A calibration curve was initially created using samples with a well known pure MeSA concentration (0 mM, 0.2 mM, 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, 2 mM). For more details about the protocol that we used for the instrument see here