Rod to L-form Switch BioBrick

Purpose and Justification

The purpose of this main ‘keystone’ biobrick is to facilitate the switching of Bacillus subtilis cells from rod-shape to L-form, wall-less cells. Furthermore, this ‘switch’ enables L-form cells to return to rod-shape when required. This is facilitated through the introduction of a xylose-controlled promoter (PxylR) upstream of the murE gene, which is involved in the biosynthesis of peptidoglycan. The presence, or absence of a cell wall can be controlled through the presence, or absence of xylose, respectively. The antibiotic resistance marker chloramphenicol acetyl-transferase (cat) is upstream of this promoter region to allow for the selection of cells in which this system is integrated.

Homologous recombination allows this BioBrick to be integrated into the chromosome of B. subtilis. The cat and PxylR sequences are flanked by sequences that are homologous with regions of the B. subtilis chromosome, which allows for insertion of the BioBrick at the intended loci. ~300bp at the 5’ end of the BioBrick is homologous with the end of the pbpB gene. Similarly ~300bp at the 3’ end of the biobrick is homologous with the start of the murE gene.

Integration of the BioBrick facilitates xylose-mediated control over the expression of murE. This cascades through biosynthetic pathways to enable control over peptidoglycan synthesis and thus control over cell wall production. Simply, in B. subtilis cells that have integrated the BioBrick into their chromosome, only in the presence of xylose is the cell wall produced. When xylose is not present cells lose their cell wall and survivors adopt the L-form phenotype.

The L-form BioBrick [http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K1185000 BBa_K1185000] can be found on the Registry of Standard Biological Parts.

Design

The L-form switch BioBrick is based upon the regulatory sequence controlling expression of murE in B. subtilis LR2 - a strain capable of L-form state. In this B. subtilis strain the peptidoglycan synthesis pathway required for the cell wall can be disrupted through control of murE expression - responsible for the synthesis of enzymes involved in peptidoglycan precursor biosynthesis. A xylose-contolled PxylR promoter upstream of murE facilitates this control. Upstream of this promoter the LR2 strain also contains a cat gene - conferring chloramphenicol resistance. These genetic components differentiate the B. subtilis LR2 chromosome from that of B. subtilis 168. On the LR2 chromosome these genetic components take the place of the spoVD gene (involved in sporulation) in B. subtilis 168. It is these genetic elements that have been utilised to create a BioBrick that facilitates the switching of B. subtilis cells from rod state to L-form, and back again. The flanking regions of the cat gene and the PxylR promoter - part of the pbpB coding sequence at the 5' end of this region of DNA and part of the murE coding sequence at the 3' end - are also of vital importance, allowing for integration of the BioBrick into the chromosome of B. subtilis via homologous recombination.

In order to package the genetic elements within the B. subtilis chromosome that enable this strain to transition from rod to L-form, the full sequence of the region between the pbpB and the murE genes had to be identified. The sequence for the L-form switch region was obtained through a de novo assembly (using Sequencher 5.1 DNA sequencing software) of sequence data gained from sequencing between the pbpB and murE genes on the B. subtilis LR2 chromosome (using designed primers) with reads produced by high throughput sequencing of the full B. subtilis LR2 genome. In particular, reads that did not assemble when using B. subtilis 168 as a reference genome were used in this assembly. The primers that were designed to sequence the region between the pbpB and murE genes on the B. subtilis LR2 chromosome allowed sequencing from both the 5’ and the 3' ends of the desired sequence. The design of the primers allowed for sequencing to include the final 309bp at the 3’ end of the pbpB coding sequence (upstream of the L-form switch region), as well as the sequence of the 331bp at the 5’ end of the murE coding sequence (downstream, and under the control, of the L-form switch). Once fully sequenced, this region of DNA was able to be synthesised once compliant with the [http://parts.igem.org/Assembly_standard_10 BioBrick RFC[10]] standard.

To allow the L-form switch BioBrick to be submitted to the iGEM registry of standard biological parts it needed to comply with BioBrick RFC[10] standard. In order to comply with this standard the BioBrick RFC[10] prefix and suffix sequences were added to the synthetic construct sequence using Sequencher 5.1 DNA sequencing software. Two EcoRI restriction sites and a PstI restriction site that were present in the sequence were removed through single nucleotide changes using Gene Designer 2.0 - these restriction sites violated the terms of the RFC[10] standard. Base changes were chosen to optimise the altered codons (in the open reading frame of coding sequences) for codon bias in B. subtilis. The altered genetic sequence was then able to be synthesised.

Modelling

Modelling biosynthesis of peptidoglycan, specifically involving manipulation of the murE gene, was carried out. This can be found here [link.to.model (PUT LINK TO PEPTIDOGLYCAN MODEL WHEN CREATED!)]

Construction

Figure 1. Showing all of the components of L-form Switch Brick starting from the pbpb homology region at the far left, Spacer sequence, Chloramphenicol resistance marker, another Spacer, Pxyl promoter, murE RBS and finally the murE homology region at the far right.

The designed BioBrick was synthesised by DNA synthesis company DNA 2.0. The components within the BioBrick were as follows: -

Parts:

1. Biobrick prefix – RFC[10] standard.
2. 309bp of the end of the pbpB coding sequence.
3. Spacer.
4. Reverse and complement of chloramphenicol acetyl-transferase (cat) coding sequence (including native ribosome binding site (RBS) and promoter).
5. PxylR promoter.
6. Spacer.
7. RBS binding site for murE.
8. Spacer.
9. 331bp of the start of murE coding sequence.
10. Biobrick suffix – RFC[10] standard.

The synthesised BioBrick was then inserted into the pSB1C3 plasmid - the only plasmid acceptable by iGEM for part submission.

Cloning and Integration

The pSB1C3 plasmid containing the L-form switch BioBrick returned from DNA 2.0 was amplified in E.coli. The E. coli competent cell preparation and E. coli transformation protocols were used to transform this plasmid into E. coli cells for cloning. Transformant cells were incubated in order to clone the transformed plasmids. Then the cloned plasmids were extracted and transformed into B. subtilis. Integration of the BioBrick from the vector plasmid to the host chromosome was facilitated through homologous recombination with crossover events within the pbpB and murE genes.

Testing and Characterisation

In order to produce L-forms we transformed the switch BioBrick into Bacillus subtilis str.168 and plated them out onto the LB media containing 5ug/ml Chloramphenicol and 0.8% Xylose. As can be seen on Figure 1, there were colonies growing on both plate 1 (B. Subtilis str. 168 + (Switch BioBrick)) and plate 2 (positive control, B.subtilis str. 168 + pGFPrrnB) as plasmid pMutin4 confers chloramphenicol resistance. There were no colonies growing on Plate 3 which is B. subtilis str. 168 onto the same media (negative control) as B. subtilis str. 168 does not naturally have resistance to chloramphenicol. This transformation results suggests that the switch BioBrick has been transformed into B. subtilis str.168 successfully.

Plate 1: B. Subtilis str. 168 transformed with switch BioBrick.	Plate 2: B.subtilis str. 168 transformed with pGFPrrnB (positive control).
Plate 3: B. subtilis str. 168 no transformation (negative control).	Figure 1. Plates of B. Subtilis str. 168 transformed with switch BioBrick, pGFPrrnB (positive control) and water (negative control).

Even though colonies were found on Plate 1, this didn’t conclude that our BioBrick has integrated into the pbpb and murE homology region replacing the spoVD section with the chloramphenicol resistance cassete and the Pxyl promoter. So, in order to test that the transformants have actually taken up the switch BioBrick and integrated it into the homology region on the B. subtilis chromosomes, some colonies were picked from Plate 1 and innoculated into NB/MSM media with xylose concentration varying between 0% and 0.8% and incubated in 30oC for 56 hours. After this incubation the morphology of the cells was checked under the microscope (Figure 2). In the batch of B. Subtilis incubated without xylose, all of the cells appeared as L-forms and in 0.2% xylose the majority of the cells were L-forms with only occasional rods. In 0.4% and 0.5% xylose the majority of the cells were rods with only a couple of L-forms being spotted and 0.6% and 0.8% xylose all cells appeared as rods. The results of this experiment have been summarised into table and graph formats which is displayed on Table 1 and Graph 1. This result concludes that our switch BioBrick works as designed and as the model suggested it would.

O% xylose	0.2% xylose
0.4% xylose	0.5% xylose
0.6% xylose	0.8% xylose

Figure 2. This shows the appearance of B. subtilis cells transformed with our switch BioBrick after being innoculated into a 1:1 ration of NB and MSM media with a range of xylose concentrations and incubated in 30oC for 56 hours. The xylose concentrations in %(w/v) are denoted under each image.

Table 1. Number of L-forms and rod cells and ratio of L-forms to rod cells of B. Subtilis 168 containing our switch BioBrick in Different xylose concentrations after 56 hours Incubation

Graph 1. Ratio of L-forms to rod cells of B. Subtilis 168 containing our switch BioBrick in Different xylose concentrations after 56 hours Incubation

We also considered using Flow cytometry to sort between L-form sand rods cells over a period of 72 hours to give us more detailed and accurate results of when cells actually starts to turn into L-forms from rods in media with different xylose concentrations. However, due to the high viscosity of the media (NB/MSM) which contains sucrose that L-forms need to survive we couldn’t calibrate the Flow Cytometry to do the reading.

To further test the switch BioBrick, we also transformed it into B. subtilis BSB1. As can be seen on Figure 3, there were colonies growing on both Plate 4 (B. Subtilis BSB1 + (Switch BioBrick)) and also on Plate 5 (positive control, B.subtilis BSB1 + pGFPrrnB) as plasmid pMutin4 confers chloramphenicol resistance. There were no colonies growing on Plate 6 which was inoculated with B. subtilis BSB1 onto the same media (negative control)as B. subtilis BSB1 does not naturally have resistance to chloramphenicol. With these results, we can conclude that the switch BioBrick can be successfully transformed and integrated into both commonly used B. subtilis lab strains.

Plate 4: B. Subtilis BSB1 transformed with the switch BioBrick.	Plate 5: B. Subtilis BSB1 transformed with the pGFPrrnB (positive control).
Plate 6: B. Subtilis BSB1, not transformed (negative control).	Figure 3. Plates of B. Subtilis str. BSB1 transformed with switch BioBrick, pGFPrrnB (positive control) and water (negative control).

The images in figure 4 and 5 show the different morphology of B. subtilis str. 168 and BSB1 before the integration of the switch BioBrick and following 56 hours incubation in 0% Xylose NB/MSM media.

Figure 4. B. subtilis str. 168 prior to transformation with our switch BioBrick

B. subtilis str. 168 after to transformation with our switch BioBrick

Figure 5. B. subtilis str. BSB1 prior to transformation with our switch BioBrick

B. subtilis str. BSB1 after to transformation with our switch BioBrick

This method of generating L-forms is very time consuming, and follows the Liquid media protocol. Figure 4 shows L-forms being generated from B. subtilis rods, a process taking 12 hours. In order to speed things up you can use lysosyme to initially remove the cell wall as in our Lysozyme protoplasting protocol. The L-forms as explained in the L-form page will still be able to grow and divide in contrary to protoplast.

Figure 4. Fluorescence microscopy showing B. subtilis rod cells turning into L-forms over a period of nearly 12 hours following the https://2013.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Notebook/protocols#L-form_Growth_Media Liquid media protocol].

Video 1.

References

[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19212404 Leaver M., Dominguez-CuevasP., Coxhead J.M., Daniel R.A. and Errington J. (2009) Life without a wall or division machine in Bacillus subtilis. Nature, 457, 849-853.]

[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23452849 Mercier R., Kawai Y. and Errington J. (2013) Excess membrane synthesis drives a primitive mode of cell proliferation. Cell, 152, 997-1007.]