Team:Tokyo Tech/Experiment/Crosstalk Circumvention Assay

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(64 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tokyotechmenudark}}
{{tokyotechmenudark}}
-
<html>
 
-
<body >
 
<div id="text-area"><br>
<div id="text-area"><br>
-
<div class="box">
+
<div class="box" id="title">
 +
<p style="line-height:0em; text-indent:0em;">Crosstalk Circumvention Assay</p>
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="box">
 +
<h1>1. Introduction </h1>
-
<h1>crosstalk circumvention assay
 
-
</h1>
 
-
<h3>Introduction
 
-
</h3>
 
<h2>
<h2>
-
<p>Our purpose is to check whether the hybrid promoter Plux/tet would be repressed or not when C12-LasR complex and protein TetR are co-existed.(Fig9).  C12-LasR-dependent activation of Plux promoter is known to be problem in synthetic biology and we confirmed this crosstalk activation (Fig)We then compared, for the first time, the amount of crosstalk for Plux/tet hybrid promoter in the presence or absence of the TetR inhibitor aTcThe bindings between TetR protein and TetO sequence on DNA is known to be weakened by aTc.  Tokyo tech 2012 indeed showed that the GFP expression of the cells in which both of C6 and aTc were added was higher than that of the cells in which only C6 was addedSimilarly, if the GFP expression of the cells where we added both of C12 and aTc was higher than that of the cells where we added only C12, it is proved that the crosstalk can be suppressed by TetR.
+
<p>Of course, if you want to avoid crosstalk, you have to search ideas for crosstalk circumventionHowever, you must make conditions without affecting system wide, or without changing the basis of system in the idea for improvementThis is because "crosstalk circumvention by changing system-wide" is the same meaning as saying "crosstalk circumvention only in that circuit"For example, when you want to avoid crosstalk in the circuit on the basis of toggle switch system, you should think that it is nonsense to avoid crosstalk by abandoning toggle switch system.  You should think it's nice to avoid crosstalk without abandoning toggle switch system.  In short, I hope crosstalk circumvention system is applicable to various circuits.  Based on this view, we planned the following idea and experimentation.
</p>
</p>
</h2>
</h2>
-
<h3>Construction
+
<h1>2. Summary of the experiment </h1>
-
</h3>
+
<h2><p>Our purpose is to check whether or not <i>lux/tet</i> hybrid promoter would be repressed when 3OC12HSL-LasR complex and protein TetR exist.  We tried to compare the frequency of crosstalk in the presence or absence of the aTc, the TetR inhibitor.
-
<h2>
+
-
<p>We made a simple crosstalk circumvention system and named it “Crosstalk Circumvention Switch”. (Fig 10)
+
</p>
</p>
-
<p>To construct the circuit in above, we ligated Pcon-RBS-LasR-TT(K553003) and Plux/tet-RBS-GFP-TT(K934025) as the reporter plasmid. We used Pcon-RBS-LuxR-TT-Ptrc-RBS-TetR-TT as the regulator plasmid.
+
<p>We prepared six conditions as follow.
 +
<blockquote>
 +
<li>E-1) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with 3OC6HSL induction
 +
<li>E-2) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with 3OC12HSL induction
 +
<li>E-3) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with DMSO (no induction)
 +
<br><br>
 +
<li>F-1) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with 3OC6HSL and aTc induction
 +
<li>F-2) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with 3OC12HSL and aTc induction
 +
<li>F-3) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with DMSO and aTc (no induction)
 +
<br><br>
 +
<li>Positive control and negative control are similarly operated.
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<p>
 +
We also screened the concentration of 3OC6HSL and aTc, and examined activation of the crosstalk circumvention system circuit. Then we determined the transfer function of 3OC6HSL-LuxR complex by least squares method fitting and introduced into our [https://2013.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Modeling/Crosstalk_Circumvention#2-3._Parameter_optimization_and_simulation modeling].
</p>
</p>
</h2>
</h2>
-
<h3>Result
+
<h1>3. Prediction </h1>
-
</h3>
+
<h2>
<h2>
-
<p>In the graph below (Fig11), the level of GFP expression in cells where TetR is active is clearly lower than when TetR is inhibited. This fact could be confirmed in results about C12 and C6. In short, The graph below shows that Plux/tet is repressed by TetR precisely. Furthermore, the graph below shows that there is a great difference between GFP fluorescence intensity of C6+aTc and that of C12+aTc.  This difference was referred in our mathematical modeling.  
+
<p>
 +
aTc weakens the affinity of TetR for <i>tetO</i>.  Therefore, if the GFP expression level of the cells we added 3OC6HSL+aTc into was higher than that of the cells we added only 3OC6HSL into, it proved that <i>lux/tet</i> hybrid promoter is repressed by TetR. Similarly, if the GFP expression level of the cells we added 3OC12HSL+aTc into was higher than that of the cells we added only 3OC12HSL into, it proved that the crosstalk can be suppressed by TetR and the hybrid promoter.
</p>
</p>
</h2>
</h2>
-
<h3>Discussion
+
<h1>4. Materials and Methods </h1>
-
</h3>
+
<h3>4-1. Construction </h3>
 +
<h2><p>
 +
On the previous assay, we also confirmed crosstalk, which 3OC12HSL-LasR complex activates not only <i>las</i> promoter but also <i>lux</i> promoter (Gray KM et al., 1994).  We came up with an idea that crosstalk can be suppressed if <i>lux/tet</i> hybrid promoter is inhibited by protein TetR when 3OC12HSL-LasR complex exists.  We replaced <i>lux</i> promoter with <i>lux/tet</i> hybrid promoter.  What we have to do in this step is to confirm <i>lux/tet</i> hybrid promoter works correctly as a part of the system.  Therefore, we tried to make a simple crosstalk circumvention system (Fig. 3-2-1).  <i>luxR</i>, <i>tetR</i>, and <i>lasR</i> are under constitutive promoter.
 +
</p>
 +
[[Image:Titech2013_CrosstalkCircumventionAssay_3-2_1.jpg|500px|thumb|center|Fig. 3-2-1. Circuit of the simple crosstalk circumvention system]]
 +
<p>Because of the unexpected restriction enzyme binding site on the regulator plasmid, we had to place <i>luxR</i> and <i>tetR</i> on the regulator plasmid, and <i>lux/tet</i> hybrid promoter, <i>GFP</i> and <i>lasR</i> on the reporter plasmid (Fig. 3-2-2).
 +
</p>
 +
[[Image:Titech2013_CrosstalkCircumventionAssay_3-2_2.jpg|500px|thumb|center|Fig. 3-2-2. The actual circuit]]
 +
<p>
 +
To construct the circuit in above figure (Fig. 3-2-2), we ligated Pcon-RBS-<i>lasR</i>-TT ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K553003 BBa_K553003]) and Plux/tet-RBS-<i>GFP</i>-TT ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934025 BBa_K934025]) as the reporter plasmid. We used Pcon-RBS-<i>luxR</i>-TT-Ptrc-RBS-<i>tetR</i>-TT as the regulator plasmid.
 +
<blockquote>
 +
<li>Reporter: pSB6A1-Pcon-<i>lasR</i>-Plux/tet-<i>GFP</i> / Regulator: pSB3K3-Pc-<i>luxR</i>-Ptrc-<i>tetR</i> (JM2.300)...sample<br>
 +
<li>pSB6A1-Ptet-<i>GFP</i> (JM2.300)…positive control<br>
 +
<li>pSB6A1-Promoterless-<i>GFP</i> (JM2.300)…negative control<br>
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
</h2>
 +
<h3>4-2. Strain </h3>
<h2>
<h2>
-
<p>Through this assay, we confirmed points below.
+
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;JM2.300<br><br>
-
</p>
+
</h2>
-
*Plux/tet is precisely repressed by TetR. This shows crosstalk circumvention.
+
-
*An affinity of LuxR-3OC6HSL complex toward Plux/tet is stronger than
+
-
LasR-3OC12HSL complex.
+
 +
<h3>4-3. Protocol </h3>
 +
<h2>
 +
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1. O/N -> FC -> Induction<br>
 +
<p><blockquote>1.1 Prepare overnight culture of each cell (GFP posi, GFP nega, sample) at 37°C for 12 h.<br>  (=> O/N)
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<p><blockquote>1.2 Take 30 µL (from GFP posi, GFP nega, sample) of the overnight culture of inducer cell into<br> LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL+ Kan 30 µg/mL).<br>  (=> Fresh Culture)
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<p><blockquote>1.3 Incubate the flesh culture of cells (GFP posi, GFP nega, sample) until the observed OD600 reaches around 0.50.
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<p><blockquote>1.4a Take 30 µL each cell suspensions (GFP posi , GFP nega , sample) into<br>
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<blockquote>
 +
<p><blockquote>
 +
LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)<br> + 5 µM 3OC6HSL (3 µL),
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<p><blockquote>
 +
LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)<br> + 5 µM 3OC6HSL (3 µL) + 0.05 µg/mL aTc (3 µL),
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<p><blockquote>
 +
LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)<br> + 5 µM 3OC12HSL (3 µL),
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<p><blockquote>
 +
LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL+ Kan 30 µg/mL)<br> + 5 µM 3OC12HSL (3 µL)+ 0.05 mg/mL aTc (3 µL),
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<p><blockquote>
 +
LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)<br> + 5 µM DMSO (3 µL),
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<p><blockquote>
 +
LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)<br> + 5 µM DMSO (3 µL) + 0.05 mg/mL aTc (3 µL).
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
<p><blockquote>1.4b Take 30 µL each cell suspensions (GFP posi , GFP
 +
    nega , sample) into
 +
<br>
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
<blockquote>
 +
<p><blockquote>
 +
LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)<br>+ C6 (3 µL) + aTc (3 µL) … inducer concentration for each sample is shown in below (Fig 3-2-3)
 +
</blockquote></p>
 +
</blockquote>
 +
<br>
 +
<table align="center" border="1">
 +
<tr align="center">
 +
<td></td>
 +
<td colspan=7>
 +
aTc (µg/mL)
 +
</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr align="center">
 +
<td rowspan=8 width="70">
 +
<br><br><br>
 +
<p style="text-indent: 0em;
 +
padding-left: 0;">C6 (nM)</p>
 +
</td>
 +
<td width="60"><br></td><td width="60">0</td><td width="60">0.05</td><td width="60">0.15</td><td width="60">0.5</td><td width="60">1.5</td><td width="60">5</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr align="center"><td>0</td><td>No. 1</td><td>No. 2</td><td>No. 3</td><td>No. 4</td><td>No. 5</td><td>No. 6</td></tr>
 +
<tr align="center"><td>0.3</td><td>No. 7</td><td>No. 8</td><td>No. 9</td><td>No. 10</td><td>No. 11</td><td>No. 12</td></tr>
 +
<tr align="center"><td>1</td><td>No. 13</td><td>No. 14</td><td>No. 15</td><td>No. 16</td><td>No. 17</td><td>No. 18</td></tr>
 +
<tr align="center"><td>3</td><td>No. 19</td><td>No. 20</td><td>No. 21</td><td>No. 22</td><td>No. 23</td><td>No. 24</td></tr>
 +
<tr align="center"><td>10</td><td>No. 25</td><td>No. 26</td><td>No. 27</td><td>No. 28</td><td>No. 29</td><td>No. 30</td></tr>
 +
<tr align="center"><td>30</td><td>No. 31</td><td>No. 32</td><td>No. 33</td><td>No. 34</td><td>No. 35</td><td>No. 36</td></tr>
 +
<tr align="center"><td>100</td><td>No. 37</td><td>No. 38</td><td>No. 39</td><td>No. 40</td><td>No. 41</td><td>No. 42</td></tr>
 +
</table>
 +
<center>Fig. 3-2-3. Inducer concentration for each sample</center>
 +
<p><blockquote>
 +
1.5 Incubate all samples (6 samples X 6 kinds of culture = 36 samples) for another 4 h at 37°C. <br> (=> Induction)
 +
</blockquote></p>
</h2>
</h2>
-
<h3>5. mathematical modeling
 
-
</h3>
 
<h2>
<h2>
-
<p>Modeling of Ninja circuit: Cross-talk circumvention
+
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2. Measurement (Flow cytometer)<br>
 +
<p>2.1 Measure all samples' OD600.</p>
 +
<p>2.2 Dilute all samples with 1X PBS to keep OD600 in the range from 0.2 to 0.5.
</p>
</p>
-
<p>(detailed expression is here(link))
+
<p>2.3 Take 1 mL (from all samples) into disposable tube (for flow cytometer).
</p>
</p>
-
<p>In order to clarify the parameter sensitivities and dynamic characteristics in the of the circumvention of cross-talk between LasR and LuxR, we modeled Ninja circuit by using ODEs. To know how strong the CrossTalk prevention circuit could be, furthermore, we compared with two gene circuits which with or without CrossTalk prevention circuit.  
+
<p>2.4 Centrifuge them at 9,000g, 4°C, 1 min. and take their supernatant away.
</p>
</p>
-
<p>Firstly we consider the situation that when E.Civilian comes to cautious state. The following graph shows the switching from cautious state to civilian state which is influenced by C6 came from E.Civilian. And we can know when E.Civilian comes on the time of 300min, CI cautious state will switch to civilian state.
+
<p>2.5 Suspend all samples with 1 mL 1X PBS.
</p>
</p>
-
TetR increases after LacI
+
<p>2.6 Measure all samples.
-
<p>During the switching from the cautious state to the mimic state, absence of TetR allows activation of Pluxtet hybrid promoter. Repression of TetR production, by CI434, is indeed important in the circuit.  During the mimic state, TetR accumulates to plateau level.  This presence of TetR is important to prevent crosstalk by LasR activated by C12AHL.
+
</p>
</p>
-
<p>Secondary, we consider the situation that when E.samurai comes to the mimic state. When switching occurs from cautious state to shuriken state, CI is expressed.  Not that LacI expression form the Pluxtet hybrid promoter is prohibited, due to the presence of tetR, even in the presence of C12-LasR complex which can bind to the hybrid promoter for its activation.  After C12 decomposition, shuriken state should switch back to cautious state.
+
<p>2.7 Save and organize data.
</p>
</p>
-
<p>Interestingly, CI expression oscillates and converge by C12AHL induction.  This is because not only the toggle switch, but also there is a repressilator by combination among TetR, LacI and CI434.  Note that there is difference in CI concentration between the shuriken state and the cautious state.  This difference will be used for the decision making whether E.ninjya releases syuriken or not.
 
-
</p>
 
-
<p>Then we compared the behavior of the E .Coli in the presence or absence of the crosstalk circumvention circuit. We succeed in confirming that the crosstalk circumvention circuit not only suppresses the crosstalk but also makes the switching faster.
 
-
</p>
 
-
<p>The following graph shows the changing of LacI and CI. The solid line stand for the case with CrossTalk prevention circuit, and the dotted line stands for the case without CrossTalk prevention circuit. When there are certain amount of C12 production, LacI is produced in a certain amount in the toggle without CrossTalk prevention circuit, and in contrary, the Crosstalk would not be conspicuous. But in the other circuit which there is CrossTalk prevention circuit, LacI would not be produced and switching to the CI state is conspicuous.
 
-
</p>
 
-
<p>For confirming the efficiency of those two toggle switches, we set LacI as the horizontal axis and CI as the vertical axis, then we plot the changing out. We can get the conclusion that the switching is much faster in the circuit with CrossTalk prevention circuit.
 
-
</p>
 
-
 
-
 
</h2>
</h2>
-
<h3>6. application
+
<h1>5. Results of the assay </h1>
-
</h3>
+
<h2>
<h2>
-
<p>Our crosstalk circumvention system gives more flexibility to design genetic circuits because this system has a simple network topology composed of two repressor proteins and one repressor and one hybrid promoter. Along with the topology, one can just choose in any combination of sets of repressor protein and promoter. This system can be used for various genetic circuits that has other crosstalk.  
+
[[Image:Titech2013_CrosstalkCircumventionAssay_3-2_3.jpg‎|500px|thumb|center|Fig. 3-2-4. Crosstalk circumvention results]]
-
</p>
+
</h2>
</h2>
-
<h3>7. Reference
+
<h2><p>Fig. 3-2-4 shows the following.  <i>lux/tet</i> hybrid promoter is repressed by TetR in the presence of 3OC6HSL-LuxR complex.  Similarly, <i>lux/tet</i> hybrid promoter is repressed by TetR in the presence of 3OC12HSL-LasR complex.  In brief, results from E-1) and F-1) are similar to those from E-2) and F-2).  Therefore, the crosstalk circumvention experiment succeeded.
-
</h3>
+
</p></h2>
<h2>
<h2>
-
<p>1. Timothy S. Gardner (2000) Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 403, 339-342
+
[[Image:Titech2013_CrosstalkCircumventionAssay_3-2_5.jpg‎|500px|thumb|center|Fig. 3-2-5. Activation of the crosstalk circumvention system circuit]]
-
</p>
+
</h2>
-
<p>2. Gray KM (1994) Interchangeability and specificity of components from the quorum-sensing regulatory systems of Vibrio fischeri and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of bacteriology 176(10): 3076–3080.
+
<h2><p>Fig. 3-2-5 shows activation of the crosstalk circumvention system circuit. It shows transition of the fluorescence intensity of GFP. It indicates that the concentration of C6 saturates between 10 mM and 30 mM.
-
</p>
+
-
<p>3. Hideki Kobayashi (2004) Programmable cells: Interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. vol. 101 no. 22 8414–8419
+
</p>
</p>
</h2>
</h2>
-
 
+
<h1>6. Reference </h1>
-
 
+
<h2>
-
 
+
<OL><LI>
 +
Gray KM, Passador L (1994) Interchangeability and specificity of components from the quorum-sensing regulatory systems of Vibrio fischeri and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.  Journal of bacteriology 176(10): 3076–3080.</LI></OL>
 +
</h2>
</div><br>
</div><br>
 +
<html><div align="center"><a href="https://2013.igem.org/Team:Tokyo_Tech/Experiment/Crosstalk_Circumvention_Assay#top"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2013/f/f0/Titeh2013_backtotop.png" width="200px"></a></div></html>
</div>
</div>
-
</body>
 
-
</html>
 

Latest revision as of 03:05, 29 October 2013


Crosstalk Circumvention Assay

Contents

1. Introduction

Of course, if you want to avoid crosstalk, you have to search ideas for crosstalk circumvention. However, you must make conditions without affecting system wide, or without changing the basis of system in the idea for improvement. This is because "crosstalk circumvention by changing system-wide" is the same meaning as saying "crosstalk circumvention only in that circuit". For example, when you want to avoid crosstalk in the circuit on the basis of toggle switch system, you should think that it is nonsense to avoid crosstalk by abandoning toggle switch system. You should think it's nice to avoid crosstalk without abandoning toggle switch system. In short, I hope crosstalk circumvention system is applicable to various circuits. Based on this view, we planned the following idea and experimentation.

2. Summary of the experiment

Our purpose is to check whether or not lux/tet hybrid promoter would be repressed when 3OC12HSL-LasR complex and protein TetR exist. We tried to compare the frequency of crosstalk in the presence or absence of the aTc, the TetR inhibitor.

We prepared six conditions as follow.

  • E-1) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with 3OC6HSL induction
  • E-2) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with 3OC12HSL induction
  • E-3) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with DMSO (no induction)

  • F-1) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with 3OC6HSL and aTc induction
  • F-2) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with 3OC12HSL and aTc induction
  • F-3) Culture containing crosstalk circumvention system cell with DMSO and aTc (no induction)

  • Positive control and negative control are similarly operated.
  • We also screened the concentration of 3OC6HSL and aTc, and examined activation of the crosstalk circumvention system circuit. Then we determined the transfer function of 3OC6HSL-LuxR complex by least squares method fitting and introduced into our modeling.

    3. Prediction

    aTc weakens the affinity of TetR for tetO. Therefore, if the GFP expression level of the cells we added 3OC6HSL+aTc into was higher than that of the cells we added only 3OC6HSL into, it proved that lux/tet hybrid promoter is repressed by TetR. Similarly, if the GFP expression level of the cells we added 3OC12HSL+aTc into was higher than that of the cells we added only 3OC12HSL into, it proved that the crosstalk can be suppressed by TetR and the hybrid promoter.

    4. Materials and Methods

    4-1. Construction

    On the previous assay, we also confirmed crosstalk, which 3OC12HSL-LasR complex activates not only las promoter but also lux promoter (Gray KM et al., 1994). We came up with an idea that crosstalk can be suppressed if lux/tet hybrid promoter is inhibited by protein TetR when 3OC12HSL-LasR complex exists. We replaced lux promoter with lux/tet hybrid promoter. What we have to do in this step is to confirm lux/tet hybrid promoter works correctly as a part of the system. Therefore, we tried to make a simple crosstalk circumvention system (Fig. 3-2-1). luxR, tetR, and lasR are under constitutive promoter.

    Fig. 3-2-1. Circuit of the simple crosstalk circumvention system

    Because of the unexpected restriction enzyme binding site on the regulator plasmid, we had to place luxR and tetR on the regulator plasmid, and lux/tet hybrid promoter, GFP and lasR on the reporter plasmid (Fig. 3-2-2).

    Fig. 3-2-2. The actual circuit

    To construct the circuit in above figure (Fig. 3-2-2), we ligated Pcon-RBS-lasR-TT ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K553003 BBa_K553003]) and Plux/tet-RBS-GFP-TT ([http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K934025 BBa_K934025]) as the reporter plasmid. We used Pcon-RBS-luxR-TT-Ptrc-RBS-tetR-TT as the regulator plasmid.

  • Reporter: pSB6A1-Pcon-lasR-Plux/tet-GFP / Regulator: pSB3K3-Pc-luxR-Ptrc-tetR (JM2.300)...sample
  • pSB6A1-Ptet-GFP (JM2.300)…positive control
  • pSB6A1-Promoterless-GFP (JM2.300)…negative control
  • 4-2. Strain

       JM2.300

    4-3. Protocol

       1. O/N -> FC -> Induction

    1.1 Prepare overnight culture of each cell (GFP posi, GFP nega, sample) at 37°C for 12 h.
    (=> O/N)

    1.2 Take 30 µL (from GFP posi, GFP nega, sample) of the overnight culture of inducer cell into
    LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL+ Kan 30 µg/mL).
    (=> Fresh Culture)

    1.3 Incubate the flesh culture of cells (GFP posi, GFP nega, sample) until the observed OD600 reaches around 0.50.

    1.4a Take 30 µL each cell suspensions (GFP posi , GFP nega , sample) into

    LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)
    + 5 µM 3OC6HSL (3 µL),

    LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)
    + 5 µM 3OC6HSL (3 µL) + 0.05 µg/mL aTc (3 µL),

    LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)
    + 5 µM 3OC12HSL (3 µL),

    LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL+ Kan 30 µg/mL)
    + 5 µM 3OC12HSL (3 µL)+ 0.05 mg/mL aTc (3 µL),

    LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)
    + 5 µM DMSO (3 µL),

    LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)
    + 5 µM DMSO (3 µL) + 0.05 mg/mL aTc (3 µL).

    1.4b Take 30 µL each cell suspensions (GFP posi , GFP nega , sample) into

    LB (3 mL) + antibiotics (Amp 50 µg/mL + Kan 30 µg/mL)
    + C6 (3 µL) + aTc (3 µL) … inducer concentration for each sample is shown in below (Fig 3-2-3)


    aTc (µg/mL)




    C6 (nM)


    00.050.150.51.55
    0No. 1No. 2No. 3No. 4No. 5No. 6
    0.3No. 7No. 8No. 9No. 10No. 11No. 12
    1No. 13No. 14No. 15No. 16No. 17No. 18
    3No. 19No. 20No. 21No. 22No. 23No. 24
    10No. 25No. 26No. 27No. 28No. 29No. 30
    30No. 31No. 32No. 33No. 34No. 35No. 36
    100No. 37No. 38No. 39No. 40No. 41No. 42
    Fig. 3-2-3. Inducer concentration for each sample

    1.5 Incubate all samples (6 samples X 6 kinds of culture = 36 samples) for another 4 h at 37°C.
    (=> Induction)

       2. Measurement (Flow cytometer)

    2.1 Measure all samples' OD600.

    2.2 Dilute all samples with 1X PBS to keep OD600 in the range from 0.2 to 0.5.

    2.3 Take 1 mL (from all samples) into disposable tube (for flow cytometer).

    2.4 Centrifuge them at 9,000g, 4°C, 1 min. and take their supernatant away.

    2.5 Suspend all samples with 1 mL 1X PBS.

    2.6 Measure all samples.

    2.7 Save and organize data.

    5. Results of the assay

    Fig. 3-2-4. Crosstalk circumvention results

    Fig. 3-2-4 shows the following. lux/tet hybrid promoter is repressed by TetR in the presence of 3OC6HSL-LuxR complex. Similarly, lux/tet hybrid promoter is repressed by TetR in the presence of 3OC12HSL-LasR complex. In brief, results from E-1) and F-1) are similar to those from E-2) and F-2). Therefore, the crosstalk circumvention experiment succeeded.

    Fig. 3-2-5. Activation of the crosstalk circumvention system circuit

    Fig. 3-2-5 shows activation of the crosstalk circumvention system circuit. It shows transition of the fluorescence intensity of GFP. It indicates that the concentration of C6 saturates between 10 mM and 30 mM.

    6. Reference

    1. Gray KM, Passador L (1994) Interchangeability and specificity of components from the quorum-sensing regulatory systems of Vibrio fischeri and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of bacteriology 176(10): 3076–3080.