"
Team:TU-Munich/HumanPractice/Interviews
From 2013.igem.org
Expert Counsel: An overview
1) 4th Water Research Horizon Conference “Water Scarcity and Global change” in Berlin
The main goal of the participation on the 4th Water Research Horizon Conference “Water Scarcity and Global change” in Berlin on the 25th of June 2013 [Water Research Horizon Conference] was to inform ourselves about worldwide water scarcity and global change. We hoped to get inspirations for our outreach and human practice effort. Moreover we were interested in the worldwide practical realization of minimizing “the water problem”. Especially the diverse ways of approach in different countries and and the existing solutions were of interest (see Figure 2) to see how our project fits into this scope. In addition to the main speeches of ambassadors from different communities and companies we participated on a workshop session with speeches and discussion called “Water and Soils for Food and Energy - A Question of Technological Development?”.
We realized that it is quite difficult to give a straight answer to this question. J. Bouma (formerly Wageningen University, The Netherlands) answered it with “No, not alone, but start with existing technology and go from there” whereas R. Ardakanian (United Nations University, Dresden) just said “yes” after his speech. But not only the answers to the topic question were different also the point of view concerning to the worldwide water problem, scarcity or the definition of water differed by the speakers. Water in connection with waste was the main focus of the speech of R. Ardakanian, who said that waste is a resource for production of food and energy and must contribute as recycled waste in technology. According to E. Adar the goal for the next generation was (Ben Gurion University, Negev, Israel) the challenge of minimizing the water use and costs. To him it was evident that water is a synonym for food and a commodity, not a resource like gold.
The following general speeches about the water scarcity and climate change informed the audience about different present projects to reduce the water scarcity. G. Teutsch (UFZ Leipzig) who opened the conference talked about a “quick start” concerning to reduce the water scarcity, which sticks together with the rise of climate change. The main statement of the speech from the second speaker P. Krebs (TU Dresden) was that not visions, only excellent concepts, developed new topic projects and community action yield viable results. That the water topic has also an important role in politic was approached from F. Holzwarth (BMU Bonn) who also had the goal of forming a “water alliance with new individual faces”. He stated that, in contrast to the climate change, the water scarcity isn’t a major topic in politic based on the fact that “disasters drive politics”. In his speech U. Weber (DFG Bonn) picked out science (project, implementation and ideas) and society (public, politic) in relation to water scarcity and climate change as central themes. In turn, J. Sheffield (Princeton University, USA; see Figure 3) broached the issues of the transition between drought and floods.
The virtual water aspect and the ways about keeping natural balance for water quality in a mathematical model were presented by G. Bidoglio(EC-JRC IES Ispra, Italy; see figure 4). Implemented Projects are the Joint Research Project SMART (integrated Water Resource Management in the Lower Jordan Valley) and the Guanting Project (sustainable water and Agricultural Land use in the Guanting watershed under limited water resources).
In summary the visit of the conference made us realize that water scarcity and water quality are in fact vital problems that already attract much attention in academic circles. In contrast, we did not know that the global water situation is such a multifaceted subject and were stunned by the broad range of subjects that were covered during the conference. As the conference took place at the beginning of our project, the impressions we took from the conference helped us understanding what problems we should address when talking to a broader audience in our subsequent human practice efforts. Moreover the presentation of currently happening innovative projects inspired us in the design of our filter prototypes.
2) Workshop "Drugs in the Environment" in Berlin organized by the RCDS
At the end of May we joined the "Drugs in the environment" conference that was organized by the RCDS (which is the youth organisation of the CDU, the currently governing political party in Germany) and the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies.
During this discussion meeting we had the possibility to meet and discuss with several experts as well as with representatives of leading German pharmacy companies such as Bayer and Novartis. The main focus of this discussion was on the point whether pollution of the environment by pharmaceutic substances is a considerable problem for our society, whether we want to invest money to reduce this pollution, who is responsible to finance these measures. The conclusion of this conference was that in Germany there is no acute danger for mankind by contamination of the environment by pharmaceutic substances. In contrast the lowering of the detection limit for several substances leads to an awareness that there is contamination caused by mankind and that several people are not willing to accept this pollution.
3) Biotechnology 2020+ Conference of the Ministry of Research and Education in Berlin
For the third year in series the German Ministry of Research and Education invited all German iGEM Teams to join the "Biotechnology 2020+ conference" in Berlin on June 27th ["Biotechnology 2020 conference"]. “Which products and biotechnological processes are fundamental? “, “How will the next generation accept the biotechnological processes?” and “Which projects are already initiated?”. Experts in the fields economy, politics and science and the German iGEM teams came together at the conference and tried to answer these questions. In his speech, Dr. Helge Braun (parliamentary State Secretary of the BMBF) emphasized that a creative teamwork with an own developed language is necessary and introduced the new biotechnological ideas: biological implant, biomimetric desalination plant and microbial fuel cell. In the first discussion round about the topic “result of the previous activities and recommendations for action for the continuation of the initiative "Biotechnology 2020+ conference"" five ambassadors of five research institutions (Frauenhofer Society, Helmholtz Association, Max-Planck Society, Leibniz Association, TU Braunschweig) (see figure 5) presented their recently implemented ideas: printable biotechnology, cellfree bioproduction and synthesis of novel therapeutics. Exemplarily Prof. Dr. H. Jäckle (Max-Planck-Community) introduced the research network for Synthetic Biology MaxSynbio. The second discussion treated the subject “Open Source in the Biotechnology”. After the presentation there were workshops workshops on the topic “On the way to a Biotechnology 2020+”, the exhibition of the German iGEM projects 2013 (see Figure 6) and presentations of the research projects of the five research institutions.
In summary the participation enabled us to get informed about the practicable operated novel biotechnology ideas, cooperation and projects from market-leading research institutions in Germany. Furthermore we got in contact with other iGEM teams which paved the way for the second iteration of the German iGEM day.
4) Visit of the Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Leipzig
In Addition to present our project the goal of the visit of the Helmholtz Centrum of Leipzig UFZ [UFZ] on the 26 th of june 2013 was to get another objective opinion concerning our project idea, project implementation and information about practical Phytoremediation. Dr. Kuschk and Dr. Müller are members of the chair of environmental biotechnology and attend to phytoremediation or rather bioremediation (see figure 6). Their research focus is in the area of zoonosis that means the interplay between plants and microorganisms. The plant acts with the root system as a carrier to quantify the microorganisms which dispose nitrate, sulfur or toluol. Because of lack of personal genetic engineering works in UFZ isn’t possible according to Dr. Kuschk.
Together with a leadership through the laboratories with Dr. Müller (see Figure 7) we had 2 conversations with the contact people in different points of our project. Dr. Müller gave us very helpful annotations relative to our effectors. He mentioned the fact about the sense of amplification of a resistance gene EreB in environment in contrast to the biotechnological benefit. Furthermore he alluded that we had to consider the enzyme specificity, to find out the benefit of extinction of Erythromycin relative to clean water and to inform us about the costs of blue light. Another point was the use of Cathecholdioxygenase. According to Dr. Müller is a depletion of Catechol through microorganisms a very effective process. So our duty was to show the efficiency of the depletion of Catechol through moss.
The main topic we discussed with Dr. Kuschk applied to the application of our project idea in practice outside the competition framework. Dr. Kuschk was in doubt about the practical conversion based on his long lasting experiences and compared to his own developed concepts and conversions. In his opinion the costs, the concentration of the influent and the high duration of dwell of water based on the low concentration of water play a negative role, effect and influence relative to the conversion. Furthermore he prefers biofilms to membrane concerning to the immobilization of substances. Also he criticized our choice of degraded substances. In his opinion fecal substance are the cause of the high rate of death and diseases in developed countries. We explained him that we choose harmful substances according to the WHO with respect to establish our filter and show with the help of few harmful substances the degradation and bioaccumulation of them. In general he saw our project as basic research and not as practical application. In summary the visit of the UFZ enriched us in the molecular genetics part and in the view of further project thoughts. The leadership through the laboratories of UFZ showed us exemplary demonstrative a conversion of phytoremediation.
5) Expert Box: Pieris AG
The Pieris AG is a biopharmaceutical company founded in 2001 and which is commercializing the Anticalin technology. Anticalins are designed binding proteins which are a promising alternative to antibodies. These are mainly used in red biotechnology where they are used for example for tumor therapy. As these engineered binding proteins can be selected against nearly every chemical structure they are also an interesting tool for phytoremediation. Our idea was to apply the successful Anticalin technology in a total different context for the detoxification of aquatic ecosystems. We contacted the Principal Scientist of the Pieris AG and are confident that a meeting will be possible until the regional Jamboree in Lyon.
6) Expert Box: Prof. Reski (Freiburg University)
7) Visiting the iGEM Team Freiburg 2013
During our transformation experiments at the Reski lab we spent an evening with the iGEM team Freiburg and had a very delicious barbecue and an interesting scientific exchange. Thank you a lot and see you in Lyon!
8) Expert Box: Greenovation (Freiburg)
In September we went on a road trip to visit interesting companies and experts to get some consultation on our plans. As there is a biotech company which successfully employs Physcomitrella patens as a production organism for therapeutic proteins it became clear that we have to meet a responsible person of this company. Dr. Schaaf, the Principal Scientist of Greenovation invited us for a discussion and subsequently he showed us the production facility and the other labs of Greenovation. During the meeting we discussed their and our work flow for Physcomitrella, talked about production rates of therapeutic proteins and learned cultivation condition in a bioreactor as well as in nature. During the discussion we also talked about the possibility that we could order the transformation of PhyscoFilter plants (so calles BryoTechnology). This theoretical collaboration would be possible and would cost us 50 000 to 70 000 € per effector including DNA preparation, transformation and expression analysis of 1000 clones. Beside the possibility of a collaboration with PhyscoFilter the company also holds patents which could in theory block the application of Physcomitrella for commercial phytoremediation. In this case it would become necessary to buy a license for the usage of transgenic Phycomitrella plants. Other experts we have consulted can be found in our Advisory Board.
9) Expert Box: Prof. Posten (KIT Karlsruhe)
During our road trip we talked to Prof. Dr.-Ing. Clemens Posten, who is head of the Institute of bioprocess engineering at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). During our visit we were shown the institutes's bioreactors and Prof. Posten gave us an idea of how a symbiosis between plant and technology can look like. In the past his group worked on a collaboration project with Prof. Dr. Reski (see our Advisery Board) on biological process engineering for Physcomitrella patens. Throughout this discussion we figured out several important parameters we will have to control and possible problems we might have to solve in order to successfully implement our PhyscoFilter.
Read more about the results of this consultation.
10) Visiting the iGEM Team Heidelberg 2013
Also on our road trip we spent an evening with the iGEM team Heidelberg 2013. At first they told us that they were too busy with experiments but in the end they found 3 team members who showed us their lab and the gorgeous city of Heidelberg. Thank you a lot and see you in Lyon!
11) Expert box: Bestmann Green Systems (near Hamburg)
Bestmann Green Systems is an engineering company which offers commercial solutions for implementation of vegetation into aquatic ecosystems. As this is a major point of our implementation project we also talked to this company (because of the actual distance a visit was not possible). This company also sells swimming pod devices which allow the cultivation of plants on free water. This technology was highly interesting also for our business model in which Bestmann Green Systems could be a potential collaboration partner.
AutoAnnotator:
Follow us:
Address:
iGEM Team TU-Munich
Emil-Erlenmeyer-Forum 5
85354 Freising, Germany
Email: igem@wzw.tum.de
Phone: +49 8161 71-4351