Team:TU-Munich/Results/Economics
From 2013.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(→Business Model Canvas) |
(→Business Model Canvas) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<div class="box-center"> | <div class="box-center"> | ||
==Business Model Canvas== | ==Business Model Canvas== | ||
- | + | <br><br><br><br> | |
[[File:TUM13_Canvas.png|thumb|center|900px| Figure 3:]] | [[File:TUM13_Canvas.png|thumb|center|900px| Figure 3:]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
==Economic Comparison of Remediation Scenarios== | ==Economic Comparison of Remediation Scenarios== |
Revision as of 23:08, 25 September 2013
Economic Comparison of Remediation Scenarios
A comparison of biological and non-biological remediation has been published for all hazardous wast sites within the United States in which bioremediation with US$ 75 billion showed a clear advantages compared to conventional techniques with $ 750 billion [Pmentel et al., 1997].
References:
- [Edens et al., 1984] Edens, L., Bom, I., Ledeboer, A. M., Maat, J., Toonen, M. Y., Visser, C., and Verrips, C. T. (1984). Synthesis and processing of the plant protein thaumatin in yeast. Cell, 37(2):629–33.
- [Pmentel et al., 1997] Pimentel, D., Wilson, C., McCullum, C., Huang, R., Dwen, P., Flack, J. Tran, Q., Saltman, T., Cliff, T. (1997). Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. BioScience, Vol. 47, No. 11., pp. 747-757.
AutoAnnotator:
Follow us:
Address:
iGEM Team TU-Munich
Emil-Erlenmeyer-Forum 5
85354 Freising, Germany
Email: igem@wzw.tum.de
Phone: +49 8161 71-4351