Team:TU-Munich/Results/Economics

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m (→Expert interview with Greenovation)
m (→5. Customer Relationshipt)
Line 21: Line 21:
===4. Cost Structure===
===4. Cost Structure===
-
===5. Customer Relationshipt===
+
===5. Customer Relationship===
===6.  Customer Segments===
===6.  Customer Segments===

Revision as of 21:27, 3 October 2013


Business Model Canvas

Figure 3:

Exxx

A comparison of biological and non-biological remediation has been published for all hazardous wast sites within the United States in which bioremediation with US$ 75 billion showed a clear advantages compared to conventional techniques with $ 750 billion [Pmentel et al., 1997].

1. Key Activities

2. Key Partners

3. Key Ressources

4. Cost Structure

5. Customer Relationship

6. Customer Segments

7. Value Proposition

8. Chanels

9. Revanue Stream

Expert interview with Greenovation

left Fig. A: xxx

Workflow, Production rates, experiences, cultivation, patents, price as collaboration partner see other institutions in our Advisery Board

Marketing study for PhyscoFilter

Figure 3:

Neuro-Marketing

File:TUM13 Neuro-Marketing.gif
Figure 3:

References:

[Edens et al., 1984]

  1. [Edens et al., 1984] Edens, L., Bom, I., Ledeboer, A. M., Maat, J., Toonen, M. Y., Visser, C., and Verrips, C. T. (1984). Synthesis and processing of the plant protein thaumatin in yeast. Cell, 37(2):629–33.
  2. [Pmentel et al., 1997] Pimentel, D., Wilson, C., McCullum, C., Huang, R., Dwen, P., Flack, J. Tran, Q., Saltman, T., Cliff, T. (1997). Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. BioScience, Vol. 47, No. 11., pp. 747-757.

Retrieved from "http://2013.igem.org/Team:TU-Munich/Results/Economics"