Team:Evry/Chelator
From 2013.igem.org
Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | Even though we tried to simplify the cloning, | + | Even though we tried to simplify the cloning, our many attemps to obtain the constructions failed. We thus investigated every step of our cloning in order to determine why it did not work. We assumed that these failures were due to several reasons. First,the design of the overhangs' parts for the golden gate assembly had not been thorougly conceived. Indeed, two differents combination in the parts' order were actually possible. Further more, sequencing of our plasmid has shown that Thus, we have conceived new cloning approaches. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Revision as of 23:34, 4 October 2013
Iron Chelator
First strategy for enterobactin biosynthesis
Here we present Fig 1 and 2 our constructions which contain each three Lac I regulated enterobactin synthesis genes. Escherichia coli naturally have those genes into a single operon but due to their important lenghts, we decided to divide them into two indivudual constructions in order to make the cloning easier.
Fig 1 First construction containing the Lac I regulated enterobactin synthesis genes Ent A, Ent D and Ent F. Genes fusions were made with flanking restriction sites that are compatible with Biobrick-based cloning.
Fig 2 Second construction containing the Lac I regulated enterobactin synthesis genes Ent B, Ent C and Ent E. Genes fusions were made with flanking restriction sites that are compatible with Biobrick-based cloning.
NAME | FIGURE | Description |
---|---|---|
Lac promoter |
Lac Promoter |
|
RBS + EntA |
First gene required for enterobactin sythesis |
|
RBS + EntB |
Second gene required for enterobactin sythesis |
|
RBS + EntC |
Third gene required for enterobactin sythesis |
|
RBS + EntD |
Fourth gene required for enterobactin sythesis |
|
RBS + EntE |
Fifth gene required for enterobactin sythesis |
|
RBS + EntF |
Sixth gene required for enterobactin synthesis |
|
Terminator |
Transcription Stop signal |
|
Plasmid |
Backbone with ampicillin resistance |
Table 1. Genetic elements used to produce the enterobactin siderophore.
Second strategy for enterobactin biosynthesis
Even though we tried to simplify the cloning, our many attemps to obtain the constructions failed. We thus investigated every step of our cloning in order to determine why it did not work. We assumed that these failures were due to several reasons. First,the design of the overhangs' parts for the golden gate assembly had not been thorougly conceived. Indeed, two differents combination in the parts' order were actually possible. Further more, sequencing of our plasmid has shown that Thus, we have conceived new cloning approaches.
Future caracterisation of the construction