Team:Linkoping Sweden/Safety

From 2013.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<html>
<html>
<script type="text/javascript">
<script type="text/javascript">
-
var page=7;
+
var page=8;
$("#cfcontrols li").eq(page).addClass("active");
$("#cfcontrols li").eq(page).addClass("active");
$("#cfcontrols li a span").eq(page).addClass("selected");
$("#cfcontrols li a span").eq(page).addClass("selected");
Line 10: Line 10:
Use this page to answer the questions on the  [[Safety | safety page]].
Use this page to answer the questions on the  [[Safety | safety page]].
 +
 +
== Safety forms were approved on September 18, 2013 by Evan Appleton.==
====1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:====
====1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:====
Line 16: Line 18:
*environmental safety
*environmental safety
-
In the project the organism E.coli is beeing used with a risk group 2.  
+
In the project the organism E.coli is being used with a risk group 2.  
All the laboratory equipment and chemicals are used under controlled manners. We are following safety procedures Handed to us from the laboratory where we are currently working.  
All the laboratory equipment and chemicals are used under controlled manners. We are following safety procedures Handed to us from the laboratory where we are currently working.  
-
Some group members have undergone a laboration security course dealing with common risk factors. Our modified bacteria never leaves the laboratorie and our final product, the immunochemical biosensor, does not contain live bacteria, they have been lysed prior to use.  
+
Some group members have undergone a laboration security course dealing with common risk factors. Our modified bacteria never leave the laboratory and our final product, the immunochemical biosensor, does not contain live bacteria, they have been lysed prior to use.  
-
Considering theese facts, there is no safety issues regarind researchers, the public or the environment.  
+
Considering these facts, there is no safety issues regarding researchers, the public or the environment.  
====2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise safety issues?  ====
====2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise safety issues?  ====
-
There is no safety issues concidering our product. It will be an easy and safe detector of allergens with no risk using it.  
+
There are no safety issues considering our product. It will be an easy and safe detector of allergens with no risk using it.  
====3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? ====
====3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution? ====
Line 32: Line 34:
-
The committee have set up guidelines for working with living organisms etc and theese procedures are followed by the university and by our team.  
+
The committee has set up guidelines for working with living organisms etc. and these procedures are followed by the university and by our team.  

Latest revision as of 10:12, 21 October 2013

Use this page to answer the questions on the safety page.

Contents

Safety forms were approved on September 18, 2013 by Evan Appleton.

1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:

  • researcher safety
  • public safety
  • environmental safety

In the project the organism E.coli is being used with a risk group 2. All the laboratory equipment and chemicals are used under controlled manners. We are following safety procedures Handed to us from the laboratory where we are currently working. Some group members have undergone a laboration security course dealing with common risk factors. Our modified bacteria never leave the laboratory and our final product, the immunochemical biosensor, does not contain live bacteria, they have been lysed prior to use. Considering these facts, there is no safety issues regarding researchers, the public or the environment.


2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise safety issues?

There are no safety issues considering our product. It will be an easy and safe detector of allergens with no risk using it.

3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?

There is a committee as a part of a cooperation between Linköping University and the County Council (Landsting) of Östergötland.

[http://www.lio.se/Fakta-om-landstinget/Sakerhetsportalen/Organisation/SAMS/Biosakerhetskommitte/ Biosafety Committee]


The committee has set up guidelines for working with living organisms etc. and these procedures are followed by the university and by our team.


4. Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through biosafety engineering?

Unfortunately, we have not come up with any new suggestions regarding the biosafety engineering and how the biobricks can be made even safer.